B. V. Subba Reddy et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 5697–5700
5699
Table 1 (continued)
Entry
Propargyl alcohol (1)
Triethylsilane (2)
Product (3)a
Time (h)
2.0
Yield (%)b
OH
I
Me
( )5
p
Et3SiH
78c
Me
( )5
MeO
MeO
a
All products were charecterized by NMR, IR, and mass spectroscopy.
Yield refers to pure products after chromatography.
Stoichiometric amount of iodine was used.
b
c
The starting secondary propargyl alcohols were prepared using
respect to various propargylic alcohols and the results are pre-
sented in Table 1.16
known procedures.15 Encouraged by this result; we turned our
attention to various substituted propargylic alcohols. Interestingly,
a wide range of substituted aryl propargyl alcohols participated
well in this reaction (entries b–g, Table 1). Notably, sterically hin-
dered propargyl alcohols such as 2,5-dimethoxyphenyl and 2-
naphthyl derivatives were also effective for this conversion (entries
h and i, Table 1). Furthermore, the propargyl alcohol derived from
thiophene-2-carboxaldehyde also gave the product in good yield
(entry j, Table 1). To know the effect of ortho-substituent, the reac-
tion was performed with the propargyl alcohol derived from o-tol-
ualdehyde and phenylacetylene (entry k, Table 1). It was observed
that the cycloannulation of o-tolyl propargyl alcohol requires a
long reaction time when compared to p-tolylpropargyl alcohol (en-
try b, Table 1). This may be due to the steric factors of the ortho-
substituent (entry k, Table 1).
In summary, we have developed a novel and efficient catalytic
process for the synthesis of substituted indenes from aryl-substi-
tuted propargylic alcohols by means of a tandem isomerization,
reduction followed by intramolecular Friedel–Crafts type cycliza-
tion.17 The remarkable features of this procedure are high conver-
sions, excellent control of geometry of olefins, operational
simplicity, and ready availability of reagents at low cost.
Acknowledgment
B.B.R. and K.V.R. thank the CSIR, New Delhi, for the award of
fellowships.
References and notes
To further evaluate the role of the substituents on this reaction,
several propargyl alcohols with different aryl substituents were
subjected to the present reaction conditions. The reactions with
substrates bearing electron- donating groups on the aromatic ring
are faster than those of electron-deficient substrates (Table 1). To
realize the regioselectivity, the reaction was performed with
m-methoxyphenyl propargyl alcohol (entries l, Table 1). Interest-
ingly, the cycloannulation was observed regioselectively at para
to methoxy group (entries l, Table 1). Next, we attempted the reac-
tions with secondary propargyl alcohols prepared from p-substi-
tuted phenyl acetylenes (entries m and n, Table 1). In the case of
p-benzyloxysusbtituted propargyl alcohol (entry n, Table 1), the
desired product was obtained in high yield in a shorter reaction
time compared to p-nitrosusbtituted one. Finally, we examined
the reaction of triethylsilane with alkyl-substituted propargyl alco-
hols. However, vinyl iodides were obtained exclusively instead of
the formation of indene derivatives when alkyl-substituted prop-
argyl alcohols were treated with 1 equiv of iodine and 2 equiv of
triethylsilane at 80 °C in dichloroethane (entries o and p, Table
1). The formation of indene was successful only with propargylic
alcohols derived from aromatic aldehydes and phenylacetylenes.
In all the cases, the yields are generally high and the reaction times
are quite reasonable.
1. (a) Sanz, R.; Martinez, A.; Alvarez-Gutierrez, J. M.; Rodriguez, F. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 1383; (b) Liu, J.; Muth, E.; Florke, U.; Henkel, G.; Merz, K.;
Sauvageau, J.; Schwake, E.; Dyker, G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 456; (c)
Mahrwald, R.; Quint, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1655; (d) Yoshimatsu, M.;
Shimizu, H.; Kataoka, T. Chem. Commun. 1995, 149; (e) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V.
S.; Rao, K. V. R.; Kumar, G. G. K. S. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 5573; (f) Yadav,
J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Rao, T. S.; Rao, K. V. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 614.
2. (a) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Rao, K. V. R.; Narender, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009,
50, 3963; (b) Bandini, M.; Tragni, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 1501; (c)
Ljungdahl, N.; Kann, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 642; (d) Muzart, J.
Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 5815; (e) Muzart, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3077; (f)
Muzart, J. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 4179; (g) Tamaru, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005,
2647; (h) Huang, W.; Zheng, P.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, R.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, X. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 73, 6845; (i) Wang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lu, P. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2615;
(j) Zhang, X.; Teo, W. T.; Chan, P. W. H. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4990; (k)
Kothandaraman, P.; Rao, W.; Foo, S. J.; Chan, P. W. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2010, 49, 4619; (l) Lu, Y.; Fu, X.; Chen, H.; Du, X.; Jia, X.; Liu, Y. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2009, 351, 129; (m) Shu, X.-Z.; Liu, X.-Y.; Xiao, H.-Q.; Ji, K.-G.; Guo, L.-N.; Liang,
Y.-M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 243.
3. Senanayake, C.; Roberts, F.; DiMichele, L.; Ryan, K.; Liu, J.; Fredenburgh, L.;
Foster, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3993.
4. (a) Kuninobu, Y.; Nishina, Y.; Shouho, M.; Takai, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 2766; (b) Kuninobu, Y.; Kawata, A.; Takai, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
13498; (c) Kuninobu, Y.; Tokunaga, Y.; Kawata, A.; Takai, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 202.
5. (a) Duan, X. H.; Guo, L. N.; Bi, H. P.; Liu, X. Y.; Liang, Y. M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
3053; (b) Guo, L. N.; Duan, X. H.; Bi, H. P.; Liu, X. Y.; Liang, Y. M. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 3325; (c) Zhang, D. H.; Liu, Z. J.; Yum, E. K.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 251; (d) Guan, Z. H.; Ren, Z. H.; Zhao, L. B.; Liang, Y. M. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2008, 6, 1040.
6. (a) Rayabarapu, D. K.; Cheng, C. H. Chem. Commun. 2002, 942; (b) Chang, K. J.;
Rayabarapu, D. K.; Cheng, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 4781; (c) Chang, K.-J.;
Rayabarapu, D. K.; Cheng, C.-H. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3963.
No indene formation was observed with alkyl-substituted prop-
argyl alcohols. Similarly, no cycloannulation was observed with
tertiary propargyl alcohols. The catalytic efficiency of various Lewis
acids such as BiCl3, ZnCl2, and FeCl3Á6H2O was tested for this
reaction.
7. (a) Larock, R. C.; Doty, M. J.; Tian, Q.; Zenner, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7536;
(b) Larock, R. C.; Tian, Q. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2002; (c) Huang, Q.; Larock, R. C.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7342.
For instance, treatment of 1,3-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol (1) with
triethylsilane (2) in the presence of 10 mol % of FeCl3Á6H2O, BiCl3 or
ZnCl2 gave the 3-phenyl-1H-indene 3a in 50%, 45%, and 35% yields,
respectively. As a solvent, dichloroethane appeared to give the best
results. However, in the absence of either iodine or triethylsilane,
the reactions did not proceed even after 12 h. This clearly indicates
that both molecular iodine and triethylsilane are essential to facil-
itate the reaction. The products were characterized by NMR, IR, and
mass spectroscopy and also by comparison with authentic sam-
ples.11 The scope and generality of this process is illustrated with
8. Zhang, D.; Yum, E. K.; Liu, Z.; Larock, R. C. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4963.
9. (a) Skattebøl, L.; Boulette, B. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 81; (b) Padwa, A.; Blacklock,
T. J.; Loza, R. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 3712; (c) Lu, J. M.; Shi, M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
5317; (d) Yadav, V. K.; Kumar, N. V.; Parvez, M. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2281; (e)
Zhu, Z. B.; Shi, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 10219; (f) Hu, B.; Xing, S. Y.; Wang, Z.
W. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5481.
10. (a) Parham, W. E.; Egberg, D. C. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 1545; (b) Lomberget, T.;
Bentz, E.; Bouyssi, D.; Balme, G. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2055; (c) Sun, X.; Izumk, K. J.;
Hu, C. Q.; Lin, G. Q. Chin. J. Chem. 2006, 24, 430; (d) Basavaiah, D.; Reddy, K. R.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 57.
11. Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Jing, Y.; Huang, W.; Zhou, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50,
4978.