d 8.13 (d, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.72 (d, J ¼ 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.45 (d, J ¼
8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.35–7.41 (m, 4H), 7.29 (t, J ¼ 7.8 Hz, 2H).
132.6, 132.3, 132.2, 132.0, 131.2, 130.3, 128.8, 128.5,
126.8, 125.7, 125.3, 123.9, 123.3, 110.2. 31P NMR
(CDCl3): d 28.4, 30.1. Anal. calcd for C54H40NO3P3: C,
76.86; H, 4.78; N, 1.66. Found: C, 75.90; H, 4.77; N, 1.58.
MALDI-TOF (m/z): 844.2 [M+ + H].
Synthesis of 4,40,400-tri(N-carbazolyl)triphenylphosphine oxide
(TCTP). n-butyllithium (2.5 M ꢂ 7.5 mL, 18.8 mmol) was slowly
ꢀ
added at ꢁ78 C to a solution of 1 (5.5 g, 17.1 mmol) in THF
(80 mL). The reaction was kept at this temperature for 3 h, and
then 0.48 mL (5.5 mmol) of trichlorophosphine was added. The
resulting mixture was further stirred for 3 h more at ꢁ78 ꢀC before
quenching with 4 mL of methanol. Water was added, and the
mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2, washed with water, and dried
over Na2SO4. After the solvent had been completely removed,
30% hydrogen peroxide (6 mL) and CH2Cl2 (20 mL) were added
to the obtained residue and they were stirred overnight at room
temperature. The organic layer was separated and washed with
water and then brine. The extract was evaporated to dryness, and
the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel
using dichloromethane–methanol (50 : 1 to 20 : 1) as eluent to
give 4,40,400-tri(N-carbazolyl)triphenylphosphine oxide (TCTP)
with a yield of 41% (1.7 g). 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 8.09 (d, J ¼ 7.5 Hz,
6H), 8.03 (dd, J ¼ 10.0, 3.2 Hz, 6H), 7.79 (dd, J ¼ 2.2, 8.5 Hz, 6H),
7.49 (d, J ¼ 8.2 Hz, 6H), 7.38 (t, J ¼ 8.2 Hz, 6H), 7.26 (t, J ¼ 7.5 Hz,
6H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 141.8, 140.2, 133.9, 131.3, 129.9, 126.8,
126.3, 123.9, 120.6, 109.7. 31P NMR (CDCl3): d 27.5. Anal. calcd
for C54H36N3OP: C, 83.81; H, 4.69; N, 5.43. Found: C, 84.03; H,
4.59; N, 5.08. MALDI-TOF (m/z): 774.3 [M+ + H].
Measurement and characterization
1H NMR, 13C NMR and 31P NMR spectra were recorded with
Bruker Avance 300 NMR spectrometer. Elemental analysis was
performed using a Bio-Rad elemental analysis system. MALDI/
TOF (matrix assisted laser desorption ionization/time-of-flight)
mass spectra were performed on AXIMA CFR MS apparatus
(COMPACT). Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) and differ-
ential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were performed under a flow of
nitrogen with a Perkin-Elmer-TGA 7 and Perkin-Elmer-DSC 7
system, respectively. UV-vis absorption and photoluminescence
spectra were measured with a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 35 UV/vis
spectrometer and a Perkin-Elmer LS 50B spectrofluorometer,
respectively. Phosphorescence spectra at 77 K were measured in
a toluene–ethanol–methanol (5 : 4 : 1) solvent misxture. The
highest energy peaks in the phosphorescence spectra at 77 K were
referred to as the S0n ¼ 0 ) T1n ¼ 0 transitions. Cyclic voltammetry
(CV) experiments were performed on an EG&G 283 (Princeton
Applied Research) potentiostat/galvanostat system. With regard
to the energy level of the ferrocene reference (4.8 eV relative to the
vacuum level), the HOMO and LUMO energy levels were calcu-
lated according to the following three equations: HOMO ¼ ꢁe
(4.8 V + Eox), LUMO ¼ ꢁe (4.8 V + Ered), and LUMO ¼ Eg +
HOMO. Here, Eox and Ered were taken from the onset of the
oxidation and reduction potential, respectively, and Eg was the
optical band gap estimated from the onset of the absorption
spectrum.9 Theoretical calculations were performed using the
Gaussian 03 program, and the chemical structures of TCTP and
TPCz were fully optimized by density functional theory (DFT)
using Beck’s three-parameterized Lee–Yang–Parr exchange
functional (B3LYP) with 6-31G* basis sets.
Synthesis of 9-(40-bromophenyl)-3,6-dibromocarbazole (2). To
a solution of 1 (1.6 g, 5.0 mmol) in DMF (20 mL) at 0 ꢀC, NBS
(2.0 g, 11.0 mmol) in DMF (10 mL) was added drop-wise. The
mixture was stirred for 3 h at room temperature. Then, water was
added to the mixture to give a white precipitate. After filtration
and drying, the obtained white solid was recrystallized from
petroleum to afford 9-(40-bromophenyl)-3,6-dibromocarbazole
(2) with a yield of 86% (2.1 g). 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 8.19 (d, J ¼
1.8 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (d, J ¼ 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.51 (dd, J ¼ 8.7, 1.8 Hz,
2H), 7.38 (d, J ¼ 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (d, J ¼ 8.7 Hz, 2H).
Synthesis of 3,6-bis(diphenylphosphoryl)-9-(40-(diphenylphos-
phoryl)phenyl)carbazole (TPCz). n-butyllithium (2.5 M, 5.3 mL,
13.2 mmol) was slowly added at ꢁ78 ꢀC to a solution of 2 (1.9 g,
4.0 mmol) in THF (100 mL). The reaction was kept at this
temperature for 3 h, and then 2.4 mL (13.2 mmol) of chlor-
odiphenylphosphine was added. The resulting mixture was stir-
red for 3 h more at ꢁ78 ꢀC before quenching with 5 mL of
methanol. Water was added, and the mixture was extracted with
CH2Cl2, washed with water, dried over Na2SO4. After the
solvent had been completely removed, 30% hydrogen peroxide
(15 mL) and CH2Cl2 (20 mL) were added to the obtained residue
and they were stirred overnight at room temperature. The
organic layer was separated and washed with water and then
brine. The extract was evaporated to dryness, and the residue was
purified by column chromatography on silica gel using ethyl
acetate–methanol (20 : 1) as eluent to give 3,6-bis(diphenyl-
phosphoryl)-9-(40-(diphenylphosphoryl)phenyl)carbazole
(TPCz) with a yield of 47% (1.6 g). 1H NMR (CDCl3):
d 8.45 (d, J ¼ 12.3 Hz, 2H), 7.95 (d, J ¼ 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.91
(d, J ¼ 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.65–7.79 (m, 16H), 7.44–7.62
(m, 20H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 142.8, 139.7, 134.2, 133.7,
Device fabrication and testing
N,N0-bis((1-naphthyl)-N,N0-diphenyl-1,10-biphenyl-4,40-diamine
(NPB) was purchased from Acros, while TCTA, N,N0-dicarb-
azolyl-3,5-benzene (mCP), 3-(4-biphenyl)-4-phenyl-5-(4-tert-
butylphenyl)-1,2,4-triazole (TAZ) and iridium(III)[bis(4,6-
difluorophenyl)-pyridinato-N,C2]-picolinate
(FIrpic)
were
prepared in our lab. OLEDs were fabricated by means of vacuum
deposition with ITO glass as the substrate (10 U/,). The ITO
surface was degreased in an ultrasonic solvent bath and then
dried at 120 ꢀC prior to use. For device I, 70 nm thick NPB film
followed by 5 nm thick TCTA film was first deposited on the ITO
glass substrates. 8 wt% FIrpic and TCTP were co-evaporated to
form a 20 nm emitting layer (EML). Successively, TAZ (40 nm),
LiF (1nm) and Al (100 nm) were evaporated at a base pressure
less than 10ꢁ6 Torr (1 Torr ¼ 133.32 Pa). For comparison, device
II was also fabricated with TCTA as the host instead of TCTP.
Device III was similarly assembled with the sequence: ITO on
glass substrate, 65 nm of NPB, 20 nm of the EML made of TPCz
doped with 8 wt% FIrpic, 40 nm of TAZ, 1 nm of LiF and
100 nm Al. To improve the device performance, device IV was
8132 | J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 8126–8133
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010