6054
K. Cui et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 6052–6055
may weaken the corresponding ICT absorption; (2) at high pH va-
lue HOCl is easily dissociated into ClOÀ and accordingly the oxida-
tion capacity of the solution is weak. This study indicates that
probe 1 can be employed for the detection of ClOÀ in aqueous solu-
tions with pH 5–9.
1 only, F-, Cl-, Br-, I-, ClO3-, ClO4-,
CO32-, SO42-, PO43-, H2PO4-, OH-.
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-
The absorption spectra of probe 1 in the presence of other reac-
tive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen specied (RNS)
OCl
Å
including H2O2, 1O2, O2ÁÀ, ROOÅ, NOÅ, and OH were measured in
PBS buffer (0.1 M) at pH 7.4. The absorption spectrum of probe 1
was almost unaltered in the presence of these ROS&RNS. Figure 3a
depicts the absorbance variation at 572 nm for probe 1 in the pres-
ence of ClOÀ (1.0 equiv vs probe 1) and other ROS&RNS (10.0 equiv
for each species vs probe 1). It is obvious that large absorbance
change was only observed for probe 1 after the addition of ClOÀ. This
is consistent with the observation that the solution of probe 1 be-
came blue only after the addition of ClOÀ as shown in Figure 3b,
where the photos of the solutions of probe 1 in the presence of ClOÀ
and other ROS&RNS species were displayed. These results demon-
strate that probe 1 is highly selective toward ClOÀ. Alternatively,
the absorption spectra of probe 1 were also measured after sequen-
tial addition of 10.0 equiv of each ROS&RNS species and 1.0 equiv of
ClOÀ. Absorbance at 572 nm increased significantly after the addi-
tion of 10.0 equiv of NOÅ from sodium nitroferricyanide (III) and
1.0 equiv of ClOÀ, but the absorbance at 572 nm was almost not
enhanced for probe 1 in the presence of 1.0 equiv of ClOÀ and
10.0 equiv of H2O2, O2ÁÀ, RCOOÅ, and HOÅ (see Supplementary data).
This is because of the fact that ClOÀ can react with H2O2, O2ÁÀ, the
precursors for RCOOÅ, and HOÅ,12,13 and as a result ClOÀ was
consumed in the solution and oxidation of p-methoxyphenol cannot
occur accordingly.
300
400
500
600
700
800
Wavelength/nm
Figure 4. Absorption spectra of probe 1 (50 lM) upon addition of NaOCl (1.0 equiv)
and other anions (10.0 equiv) in 0.1 M PBS buffer at pH 7.4.
interferences of other anions for this naked-eye detection of ClOÀ
(HOCl) can be neglected. Additionally, cations such as Fe2+, Fe3+
,
Cu2+, and Zn2+ also show no interferences for the detection of ClOÀ
with probe 1 since the absorption spectrum of probe 1 was almost
not affected by these metal ions (Fig. S1).
In summary, probe 1 was designed and studied for the selective
detection of ClOÀ by taking advantage of the oxidation transforma-
tion of p-methoxyphenol into benzoquinone with ClOÀ and the ICT
absorption within the electron donor–acceptor compound. Absorp-
tion spectral investigations clearly indicate that probe 1 is highly
selective toward ClOÀ and the interferences of other anions can
be neglected. Of interest is the color change for probe 1 upon
addition of ClOÀ. Thus, a highly selective naked-eye detection of
ClOÀ (HOCl) is successfully established with probe 1 and ClOÀ with
concentration as low as 1.74 lM that can be analyzed in aqueous
The interferences of other anions for the detection of ClOÀ (HOCl)
were also examined. For this purpose, the absorption spectrum of
probe 1 was measured separately in the presence of FÀ, ClÀ, BrÀ,
solution. It is anticipated that probe 1 can be used for practical
detection of ClOÀ by modifying the structure of probe 1 which
may further improve the sensitivity. Furthermore, instead of
aniline, p-methoxyphenol can be connected with electron donor
units which emit intrinsically and accordingly new naked-eye
and fluorescent probes for ClOÀ may be constructed.
IÀ, ClO3À, ClO4À, CO32À, SO42À, PO43À, H2PO4 and OHÀ (10.0 equiv
À
for each anion vs probe 1), respectively. For comparison the absorp-
tion spectrum of probe 1 was also recorded after the addition of
1.0 equiv of ClOÀ. As shown in Figure 4, new absorption around
572 nm was detected for probe 1 only upon addition of ClOÀ and
the absorption spectrum of probe 1 kept almost unchanged in the
presence of other anions. Therefore, it can be concluded that the
Acknowledgments
The present research was financially supported by NSFC,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the State Key Basic Research
Program. This work was partially supported by the NSFC-DFG joint
project (TRR61).
a
0.08
Supplementary data
0.06
0.04
0.02
Supplementary data (synthesis and characterization data of
compounds 3, 5, and 1; methods for preparation of ROS&RNS;
absorption spectra, and relevant data for the ensemble) associated
with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/
0.00
1
.-
1only H O
ROO. NO. .OH NaOCl
O
O
2
2
2
2
References and notes
b
1. (a) Gomes, A.; Fernandes, E.; Lima, J. L. F. C. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2005,
65, 45–80; (b) Oushiki, D.; Kojima, H.; Terai, T.; Arita, M.; Hanaoka, M.;
Hanaoka, K.; Urano, Y.; Nagano, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2795–2801; (c)
Li, X. H.; Zhang, G. X.; Ma, H. M.; Zhang, D. Q.; Li, J.; Zhu, D. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 11543–11548; (d) Bizyukin, A. V.; Korkina, L. G.; Velichkovskii, B. T.
Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 1995, 119, 347–351.
2. (a) Harrison, J. E.; Schultz, J. J. Biol. Chem. 1976, 251, 1371–1374; (b) Panizzi, P.;
Nahrendorf, M.; Wildgruber, M.; Waterman, P.; Figueiredo, J. L.; Aikawa, E.;
McCarthy, J.; Weissleder, R.; Hilderbrand, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
15739–15744.
3. (a) Pattison, D. I.; Davies, M. J. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001, 14, 1453–1456; (b)
Podrez, E. A.; Abu-soud, H. M.; Hazen, S. L. Free Radical. Biol. Med. 2000, 28,
1717–1725; (c) Pattison, D. I.; Davies, M. J. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 8152–8162;
(d) O’Brien, P. J. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2000, 129, 113–139; (e) Kettle, A. J.;
Winterbourn, C. C. Redox. Rep. 1997, 3, 3–15.
Figure 3. (a) The variation of the absorbance at 572 nm for probe 1 (50 lM) in PBS
(0.1 M) buffer at pH 7.4 after the addition of OClÀ (1.0 equiv) and other ROS&RNS
species including H2O2, 1O2, O2ÁÀ, ROOÁ, NOÅ and ÅOH (10 equiv for each species). (b)
The photos of the solutions of probe 1 (400 lM) in PBS (0.1 M) buffer at pH 7.4 from
left to right: solution of 1 and those after the addition H2O2 (10 equiv), OClÀ
(1.0 equiv), 1O2 (10 equiv), O2 (10 equiv), ROOÅ (10 equiv), NOÅ (10 equiv) and ÅOH
ÁÀ
(10 equiv), respectively.