6566
V. Rawat et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 6565–6567
i
ii
iii
O
OH
CHO
OH
CO2Et
vii
3
2
4
viii
iv
OTBS
OR'
N3
RO
H2N
5, R = R' = H
9
8
v
6, R = H ; R' = TBS
7, R = Ms ; R' = TBS
vi
Scheme 1. Synthesis of (S)-2-amino-3-ethylpentan-1-ol (9). Reagents and conditions: (i) triethyl phosphonoacetate, NaH, dry THF, 0–25 °C, 8 h, 93%; (ii) (a) H2 (1 atm), 10%
Pd/C, MeOH, 12 h, 25 °C; (b) LiAlH4, dry THF, 25 °C, 12 h, 83% (for two-steps); (iii) IBX, dry DMSO, 25 °C, 2 h; (iv) (a) PhNO,
L
-proline (20 mol %), CH3CN, ꢀ20 °C, 24 h then
MeOH, NaBH4; (b) H2 (1 atm), 10% Pd/C, MeOH, 12 h, 25 °C, 77% (over two-steps); (v) TBSCl, imid, CH2Cl2, 0–25 °C, 2 h, 81%; (vi) MsCl, Et3N, 45 min; (vii) NaN3, dry DMF, 60 °C,
30 h, 78% (for two-steps); (viii) LiAlH4, dry THF, 50 °C, 12 h, 75%.
alcohol 9 in 98% ee12 with an overall yield of 45.2%. The operation-
iii
i
ii
ally simple reactions with less number of steps, high overall yields
requiring a relatively low amount of inexpensive and non-toxic
proline as catalyst make this approach an attractive and useful
process.
1
Cbz
OH
OH
N
H2N
CHO
HN
Cbz
10
9
4
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 7.b.2 (1). Reagents and conditions: (i) dibenzyl azodicar-
boxylate, -proline (10 mol %), CH3CN, 0–20 °C, 3 h then MeOH, NaBH4, 92%; (ii) H2
(11.8 atm), Raney Ni, MeOH, AcOH, 70%; (iii) 5-chlorothiophene-2-sulfonyl chlo-
D
Acknowledgments
ride, Et3N, dry CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 30 min, 91%.
V.R. and P.V.C. thank CSIR, New Delhi for the award of fellow-
ships. The authors are also thankful to Dr. B. D. Kulkarni, Head,
Chemical Engineering and Process Development Division for his
encouragement and support.
presence of 20 mol %
treatment with NaBH4 in MeOH gave the crude
hol in situ and (ii) subsequent reduction of the crude
L
-proline in CH3CN at ꢀ20 °C followed by its
-aminooxy alco-
-aminooxy
a
a
alcohol with 10% Pd/C over H2 (1 atm) furnished chiral diol 5 in
77% yield over two-steps with 99% ee (determined from its Mosher
ester analysis). Selective protection of primary hydroxyl group in
diol 5 (TBSCl, imid, CH2Cl2) was achieved to produce the TBS ether
6 in 81% yield, followed by mesylation (MsCl, Et3N, CH2Cl2) of the
secondary alcohol which gave the corresponding mesylate 7. How-
ever, attempts to purify the mesylate via column chromatography
proved problematic due to its instability. This crude mesylate was,
therefore, treated immediately with sodium azide (DMF, 60 °C) to
References and notes
1. (a) Hardy, J. A.; Higgins, G. A. Science 1992, 256, 184; (b) Schenk, D. B.; Rydel, R.
E.; May, P.; Little, S.; Panetta, J.; Lieberburg, I.; Sinha, S. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38,
4141; (c) Katzman, R. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986, 314, 964.
2. Hardy, J.; Selkoe, D. J. Science 2002, 297, 353.
3. (a) Cai, L.; Liow, J. S.; Zoghbi, S. S.; Cuevas, J.; Baetas, C.; Hong, J.; Shetty, H. U.;
Seneca, N. M.; Brown, A. K.; Gladding, R.; Temme, S. S.; Herman, M. M.; Innis, R.
B.; Pike, V. W. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 148; (b) Walsh, D. M.; Klyubin, I.; Fadeeva,
J. V.; Cullen, W. K.; Anwyl, R.; Wolfe, M. S.; Rowan, M. J.; Selkoe, D. J. Nature
2002, 416, 535.
4. (a) Barten, D. M.; Guss, V. L.; Corsa, J. A.; Loo, A.; Hansel, S. B.; Zheng, M.;
Munoz, B.; Srinivasan, K.; Wang, B.; Robertson, B. J.; Polson, C. T.; Wang, J.;
Roberts, S. B.; Hendrick, J. P.; Anderson, J. J.; Loy, J. K.; Denton, R.; Verdoorn, T.
A.; Smith, D. W.; Felsenstein, K. M. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 312, 635; (b)
Siemers, E.; Skinner, M.; Dean, R. A.; Gonzales, C.; Satterwhite, J.; Farlow, M.;
Ness, D.; May, P. C. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2005, 28, 126.
5. (a) Cole, D. C.; Stock, J. R.; Kreft, A. F.; Antane, M.; Aschmies, S. H.; Atchison, K.
P.; Casebier, D. S.; Comery, T. A.; Diamantidis, G.; Ellingboe, J. W.; Harrison, B.
L.; Hu, Y.; Jin, M.; Kubrak, D. M.; Lu, P.; Mann, C. W.; Martone, R. L.; Moore, W.
J.; Oganesian, A.; Riddell, D. R.; Reines, J. S.; Sun, S. C.; Wagner, E.; Wang, Z.;
Woller, K. R.; Xu, Z.; Zhou, H.; Jacobsen, J. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19,
926; (b) Mayer, S. C.; Kreft, A. F.; Harrison, B.; Gharbia, M. A.; Antane, M.;
Aschmies, S.; Atchison, K.; Chlenov, M.; Cole, D. C.; Comery, T.; Diamantidis, G.;
Ellingboe, J.; Fan, K.; Galante, R.; Gonzales, C.; Ho, D. M.; Hoke, M. E.; Hu, Y.;
Huryn, D.; Jain, U.; Jin, M.; Kremer, K.; Kubrak, D.; Lin, M.; Lu, P.; Magolda, R.;
Martone, R.; Moore, W.; Oganesian, A.; Pangalos, M. N.; Porte, A.; Reinhart, P.;
Resnick, L.; Riddell, D. R.; Reines, J. S.; Stock, J. R.; Sun, S. C.; Wagner, E.; Wang,
T.; Woller, K.; Xu, Z.; Zaleska, M. M.; Zeldis, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, H.; Jacobsen, J.
S. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 7348.
afford the corresponding azide 8 in 78% yield {½a D25
ꢀ21.3 (c 1.6,
ꢁ
CHCl3)}. The LiAlH4 reduction of TBS azide 8 in THF at 50 °C affor-
ded the key intermediate (S)-2-amino-3-ethylpentan-1-ol 9 in 75%
yield with 99% ee, which was accomplished with the simultaneous
removal of TBS group (Scheme 1). Since the number of steps in-
volved in the
thereby limiting the overall yield (25.5%), we have explored alter-
native chemistry that involved a direct -amination approach.
Asymmetric -amination of aldehydes using proline as the cat-
alyst represents a burgeoning field of synthetic efforts toward syn-
thesizing chiral building blocks, such as -amino acids and
alcohols.10 Thus,
-amination of aldehyde 4 was carried out using
List’s protocol.10a Accordingly, aldehyde 4 was subjected to
-ami-
nation with dibenzyl azodicarboxylate in the presence of -proline
(10 mol %) to produce the -amino aldehyde, which upon in situ
a-aminooxylation process is relatively too many
a
a
a
a
a
D
a
reduction with NaBH4 afforded the protected amino alcohol 10 in
92% yield and 98% ee (determined by chiral HPLC). The amino alco-
hol 10 was then hydrogenated [Raney Ni, H2 (11.8 atm), MeOH,
AcOH (five drops)] to give (S)-2-amino-3-ethylpentan-1-ol 9 in
70% yield (Scheme 2).11 Finally, the amino alcohol 9 was condensed
with 5-chlorothiophene-2-sulfonyl chloride in the presence of Et3N
to afford the target molecule 1 in 91% yield and 98% ee (determined
by chiral HPLC)12 (Scheme 2).
6. (a) Dalko, P. I.; Moisan, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3726; (b) Dalko, P. I.;
Moisan, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5138; (c) List, B.; Seayad, J. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 719; (d) Enders, D.; Wang, C.; Liebich, J. X. Chem. Eur. J.
2009, 15, 11058; (e) Liu, X.; Lin, L.; Feng, X. Chem. Commun. 2009, 6145.
7. For a review of proline-catalyzed asymmetric reactions see: List, B. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 5573.
8. (a) Kotkar, S. P.; Sudalai, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17, 1738; (b) Kotkar,
S. P.; Sudalai, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 6813; (c) Narina, S. V.; Sudalai, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 6799; (d) Kotkar, S. P.; Chavan, V. B.; Sudalai, A. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 1001; (e) Chouthaiwale, P. V.; Kotkar, S. P.; Sudalai, A. ARKIVOC
2009, 88; (f) Rawat, V.; Chouthaiwale, P. V.; Suryavanshi, G.; Sudalai, A.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2009, 20, 2173.
In conclusion, we have described a short synthetic route to 1
incorporating a successful application of
D-proline-catalyzed asym-
9. (a) Hayashi, Y.; Yamaguchi, J.; Hibino, K.; Shoji, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
8293; (b) Zhong, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4247; (c) Hayashi, Y.;
metric -amination of aldehyde 4 to give the corresponding amino
a