developed by us and others.4 Furthermore, Fe3O4 nanopar-
ticles have emerged as robust and high-surface-area hetero-
geneous catalyst supports,5 and various strategies have
successfully demonstrated the applications of Fe3O4 nano-
particle-immobilized or -supported catalysts.6
Optically active propargyl amines, products of the asymmetric
three-component aldehyde-alkyne-amine coupling (AA3 cou-
pling), are useful building blocks and important skeletons for
biologically active compounds or natural products.7 Recently,
great efforts have been made to develop the methodology for
generating optically active propargylamines.8 We pioneered a
highly enantioselective addition of terminal alkynes to imines
to afford optically active propargylamines by using a chiral
Cu(I)-bis(oxazolinyl)pyridine (pybox) complex catalyst (Figure
1).8a,b Pybox ligands, which demonstrate great versatility in
complexation of the transition metals, were effective in a
number of highly enantioselective catalytic processes. While
several methods for the preparation of immobilized or
supported pybox ligands have been demonstrated,9 to the
best of our knowledge, no example of magnetic nanoparticle-
supported pybox complex has been reported. Herein, we wish
to report a novel magnetically recoverable Fe3O4 nanopar-
ticle-supported copper(I) pybox catalyst and its application
Figure 1. (A) Fe3O4 nanoparticle-supported copper(I) pybox catalyst
dispersion in reaction solution. (B) Fe3O4 nanoparticle-supported
copper(I) pybox catalyst adsorbed on the magnetic stirring bar.
in enantioselective direct-addition of terminal alkynes to
imines. It was found that the Fe3O4 nanoparticle-supported
copper(I) pybox exhibits high reactivity, yielding products
with good enantioselectivity. Recovery of the catalyst by
decantation of the reaction mixture in the presence of an
external magnet is easy and efficient. The catalyst was
recycled over six times without any significant loss in activity
and enantioselectivity.
The 4-bromo-substituted phenyl-pybox ligand 1, generated
from chelidamic acid 2, was selected as a suitable derivative
for further functionalization. Chelidamic acid 2 was trans-
formed to dimethyl 4-bromopyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate 3 in
high yield (Scheme 1).9b
(4) (a) Zeng, T.; Chen, W.-W.; Cirtiu, C. M.; Moores, A.; Song, G.; Li,
C.-J. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 570–573. (b) Zeng, T.; Song, G.; Moores, A.;
Li, C.-J. Synlett 2010, 13, 2002–2008. (c) Wu, X.-J.; Jiang, R.; Wu, B.;
Su, X.-M.; Xu, X.-P.; Ji, S.-J. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 3150–3156.
(d) Sreedhar, B.; Kumar, A. S.; Reddy, P. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51,
1891–1895.
(5) (a) Hu, A.; Yee, G. T.; Lin, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12486–
12487. (b) Abu-Reziq, R.; Alper, H.; Wang, D.; Post, M. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 5279–5282. (c) Dalaigh, C. O.; Corr, S. A.; Gun’ko, Y.;
Connon, S. J. Angew. Chem. Int.Ed. 2007, 46, 4329–4332. (d) Lu, A.-H.;
Salabas, E. L.; Schueth, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1222–1244.
(6) For examples, see: (a) Polshettiwar, V.; Baruwati, B.; Varma, R. S.
Chem. Commun. 2009, 1837–1839. (b) Luo, S.; Zheng, X.; Xu, H.; Mi, X.;
Zhang, L.; Cheng, J.-P. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 2431–2434. (c)
Polshettiwar, V.; Baruwati, B.; Varma, R. S. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 127–
131. (d) Kotani, M.; Koike, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Mizuno, N. Green Chem.
2006, 8, 735–741. (e) Zhang, D.-H.; Li, G.-D.; Lia, J.-X.; Chen, J.-S. Chem.
Commun. 2008, 3414–3416. (f) Kawamura, M.; Sato, K. Chem. Commun.
2006, 4718–4719. (g) Kawamura, M.; Sato, K. Chem. Commun. 2007, 3404–
3405. (h) Chouhan, G.; Wang, D.; Alper, H. Chem. Commun. 2007, 4809–
4811. (i) Abu-Reziq, R.; Wang, D.; Post, M.; Alper, H. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2007, 349, 2145–2150. (j) Ge, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, T.; Yin, Y. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8924–8928. (k) Yi, D. K.; Lee, S. S.; Ying, J. Y.
Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 2459–2461. (l) Che, C.; Li, W.; Lin, S.; Chen, J.;
Zheng, J.; Wu, J.-c.; Zheng, Q.; Zhang, G.; Yang, Z.; Jiang, B. Chem.
Commun. 2009, 599, 0–5992.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 4-Bromo-Substituted Phenyl-Pybox
(7) (a) Kauffman, G. S.; Harris, G. D.; Dorow, R. L.; Stone, B. R. P.;
Parsons, R. L., Jr.; Pesti, J. A.; Magnus, N. A.; Fortunak, J. M.; Confalone,
P. N.; Nugent, W. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3119–3121. (b) Huffman, M. A.;
Yasuda, N.; DeCamp, A. E.; Grabowski, E. J. J. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
1590–1594. (c) Enders, D.; Reinhold, U. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997,
8, 1895–1946.
Reaction of 3 and (S)-phenylglycinol generated diamide
4, which was transformed into 1 in 85% yield. The Fe3O4
(8) (a) Wei, C.; Li, C.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5638–5639. (b)
Wei, C.; Mague, J. T.; Li, C.-J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101,
5749–5754. See also: (c) Gommermann, N.; Koradin, C.; Polborn, K.;
Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5763–5766. (d) Koradin, C.;
Gommermann, N.; Polborn, K.; Knochel, P. Chem.sEur. J. 2003, 9, 2797–
2811. (e) Liu, J.; Liu, B.; Jia, X.; Li, X.; Chan, A. S. C. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2007, 18, 396–399. (f) Ji, J.-X.; Wu, J.; Chan, A. S. C. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 11196–11200. (g) Gommermann, N.;
Knochel, P. Chem.sEur. J. 2006, 12, 4380–4392. (h) Knoepfel, T. F.;
Aschwanden, P.; Ichikawa, T.; Watanabe, T.; Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5971–5973. (i) Aschwanden, P.; Stephenson, C. R. J.;
Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2437–2440. (j) Rueping, M.; Antonchick,
A. P.; Brinkmann, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6903–6906. (k)
Lo, V. K.-Y.; Liu, Y.; Wong, M.-K.; Che, C.-M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1529–
1532. For reviews, see: (l) Wei, C.; Li, Z.; Li, C.-J. Synlett 2004, 1472–
1483. (m) Zani, L.; Bolm, C. Chem. Commun. 2006, 4263–4275. (n) Li,
C.-J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 581–590.
(9) (a) Rechavi, D.; Lemaire, M. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 3467–3494.
(b) Lundgren, S.; Lutsenko, S.; Jo¨nsson, C.; Moberg, C. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 3663–3665. (c) Weissberg, A.; Halak, B.; Portnoy, M. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 4556–4559. (d) Cornejo, A.; Fraile, J. M.; Garc´ıa, J. I.; Garc´ıa-
Verdugo, E.; Gil, M. J.; Lagaretta, G.; Luis, S. V.; Mart´ınez-Merino, V.;
Mayoral, J. A. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3927–3930. (e) Cornejo, A.; Fraile, J. M.;
Garc´ıa, J. I.; Gil, M. J.; Luis, S. V.; Mart´ınez-Merino, V.; Mayoral, J. A.
J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5536–5544. (f) Burguete, M. I.; Cornejo, A.; Garc´ıa-
Verdugo, E.; Gil, M. J.; Luis, S. V.; Mayoral, J. A.; Mart´ınez-Merino, V.;
Sokolova, M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4344–4350. (g) Karimi, B.; Maleki,
A.; Elhamifar, D.; Clark, J. H.; Hunt, A. J. Chem. Commun. 2010, 6947–
6949. (h) McDonagh, C.; O’Conghaile, P.; Klein Gebbink, R. J. M.;
O’Leary, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 4387–4390. (i) Lu, J.; Ji, S.-J.;
Loh, T.-P. Chem. Commun. 2005, 2345–2347.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 3, 2011
443