naphthalenes,10 and indenes11 have been accessed using
this protocol. However, the electrophilic carbocyclization
with allenes has often been considered to be less attractive
due to the lack of efficient control of the regio- and stereo-
selectivity.12 Not long ago, Barluenga and co-workers re-
ported an interesting carbocyclization of allenes to haloge-
nated dihydronaphthalene in the presence of electrophiles.
But the use of expensive I(py)2BF4, and the relatively low
temperature make this approach a bit limited synthetically.13
Table 1. Optimization of the Electrophilic Cyclization of
1,3-Diphenylprop-2-yn-1-ola
entry
solvent
I2 (equiv)
time (h)
yield (%)b
1
2
CH3NO2
1.2
1.5
2.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
6.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
51
63
70
69
63
52
48
7
Scheme 1. Design of an Electrophile-Promoted Domino Process
CH3NO2
3
CH3NO2
4
CH3NO2
5
CH3NO2
6
CH2Cl2
7
CH3CN
8
ClCH2CH2Cl
1,4-dioxane
(CH3CH2)2O
9
nr
nr
1 0
a All reactions were run under the following conditions, unless
otherwise indicated: 0.3 mmol of 1a with 2.0 equiv of I2 in 5 mL of wet
CH3NO2 at room temperature. b nr = no reaction.
On the basis of our previous work, we have found that in
the presence of protons, substrate A loses a hydroxyl group
to afford the intermediate propargyl carbocations B. B, in
resonance with allene cation C, reacts with an iodide anion
to give D, which can be activated by an iodide cation
(Scheme 1a).14 We envisioned that aryl propargylic alcohols
could also undergo the same transformation in the presence
of iodine and then can cyclize to give diiodinated carbo-
cycles (Scheme 1 b). Herein, we report an effective method
for the synthesis of five- and six-membered carbocyclic rings
and seven-membered heterocyclic rings in the presence of I2.
Our initial study began with 1,3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-ol
(1a) (0.3 mmol) and 1.2 equiv of I2 in wet CH3NO2 at room
temperature; to our delight, the desired product, 2,3-
diiodo-1-phenyl-1H-indene (2a), was isolated in 51% yield
after 0.5 h (Table 1, entry 1). On increasing the amount of
I2 to 1.5 equiv, a 63% yield of 2a was obtained after 0.5 h
(Table 1, entry 2). On further increasing the amountof I2 to
2.0equiv, a 70% yield of 2awas obtained(Table1, entry3).
Increasing the amounts of I2 to 3.0 equiv gave the slightly
decreased yield of 69% (entry 4). Prolonging the reaction
time to 6 h decreased the yield to 63% (entry 5). The study of
the influence of different reaction media showed that CH2Cl2,
ClCH2CH2Cl, and CH3CN were less effective (entries 6-8),
whereas 1,4-dioxane and diethyl ether proved to be ineffective
(entries 9 and 10). The optimum reaction conditions thus
developed are the following: 1.0 equiv of 1a and 2.0 equiv I2 in
CH3NO2 (5.0 mL) at room temperature.
Afterhaving establishedthe optimizedconditionsforthe
present reaction, various 1,3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-ol deriv-
atives 1a-j were subjected to the above conditions, as de-
picted in Table 2. Thus, the tandem carbon-carbon bond
formations of 1,3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-ol derivatives 1a-j
proceeded smoothly to provide the corresponding prod-
ucts 2a-j in moderate to good yields. The reaction could
tolerate various substituents on the aromatic R2 groups.
Electron-withdrawing aryl groups showed a bit better
result than those with electron-rich groups in this tandem
reaction (entries 2-6). Interestingly, substrates like 1h-j
with aliphatic groups also gave the corresponding 2,3-
diiodocarbocyclic compounds 2h-j in moderate yields.
Noteworthily, we also investigated the reaction of 5
mmol of 1a in the presence of 2.0 equiv of I2; the desired
product 2,3-diiodo-1-phenyl-1H-indene was obtained in
64% yield after 1 h. Furthermore, when using IBr as the
electrophilic reagent, substrates 1,3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-ol (1a)
and 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-ol (1b) can also
afford the desired products 3-bromo-2-iodo-1-phenyl-1H-
indene (5a) and 3- bromo-2-iodo-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1H-
indene (5b) in 68% and 87% yield, respectively (Scheme 2).
(6) (a) Zhang, X.; Campo, M. A.; Yao, T.; Larock, R. C. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 763. (b) Zhang, X.; Yao, T.; Campo, M. A.; Larock, R. C.
Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 1177. (c) Huo, Z.; Gridnev, I. D.; Yamamoto, Y.
J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 1266.
(7) (a) Flynn, B. L.; Verdier-Pinard, P.; Hamel, E. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
651. (b) Yue, D.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1905. (c) Hessian,
K. O.; Flynn, B. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4377.
(8) (a) Peng, A. Y.; Ding, Y. X. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1119. (b) Peng,
A. Y.; Ding, Y. X. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 10303.
(9) (a) Zhang, X.; Sarkar, S.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
236. (b) Barluenga, J.; Vazque-Villa, H.; Merino, I.; Ballesteros, A.;
Gonzalez, J. M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2006, 12, 5790.
(10) Barluenga, J.; Vazquez-Villa, H.; Ballesteros, A.; Gonzalez,
J. M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4121.
(11) (a) Khan, Z. A.; Wirth, T. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 229. (b) Bi, H.-P.;
Guo, L.-N.; Duan, X.-H.; Gou, F.-R.; Huang, S.-H.; Liu, X.-Y.; Liang,
Y.-M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 397.
(12) (a) Li, J.; Kong, W.; Yu, Y.; Fu, C.; Ma, S. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
74, 8733. (b) Ma, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1679. (c) Li, W.; Shi, M.
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6698.
(13) Barluenga, J.; Campos-Gomez, E.; Minatti, A.; Rodriguez, D.;
Gonzalez, J. M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 8946.
(14) (a) Ji, K.-G.; Zhu, H.-T.; Yang, F.; Shaukat, A.; Xia, X.-F.;
Yang, Y.-F.; Liu, X.-Y.; Liang, Y.-M. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 5670.
(b) Ji, K.-G.; Shu, X.-Z.; Zhao, S.-C.; Zhu, H.-T.; Niu, Y.-N.; Liu,
X.-Y.; Liang, Y.-M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3206. (c) Ji, K.-G.; Zhu, H.-T.;
Yang, F.; Shu, X.-Z.; Zhao, S.-C.; Shaukat, A.; Liu, X.-Y.; Liang, Y.-M.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6151.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 4, 2011
685