THF–H2O (1 : 99, poor solvent for TPYOCB), UF rises to 0.29,
which is 150 times higher than that of bare TPYOCB in CHCl3–
CH3OH (60 : 40, good solvent for TPYOCB, UF = 0.0016), and
into the origin of the electronic transitions for the ligand and
complex. The calculated absorption wavelength of TPYOCB with
oscillator strength maxima f max was 329.24 nm (f max = 1.7123)
which is corresponding to the transition from HOMO to LUMO +
1. In the case of the Zn complex, since HOMO to HOMO - 9 are
mainly occupied by d electrons of Zn(II) ion whose transition
to p orbital on the ligand is almost forbidden (f ª 0), the
wavelength with oscillator strength maxima f max was 344.38 nm
(f max = 1.2784) corresponding to the transition from HOMO - 10
to LUMO + 1 (Fig. 4). These results support the observation in
optical measurements described above, and clearly suggest that
the difference in the direction of intramolecular charge transfer
between TPYOCB and the Zn complex is responsible for the two
tunable emission modes, as predicted in Fig. 1.
the size of the aggregates reached 46.7
3.6 nm, measured
by dynamic light scattering (DLS). Interestingly, though bare
TPYOCB exhibits almost no fluorescence in common organic
solvents, there are two distinct ways to enhance the emission,
i.e., complexation with Zn(II) ion (ILCT) or aggregate formation
(AIE). Each method efficiently augmented the fluorescence inten-
sity, whereas the final emission color significantly differs from one
another. The obtained emission maxima and CIE coordinates (x,y)
were 465 nm and (0.28,0.34) for ILCT, and 509 nm and (0.43,0.45)
for AIE, respectively (Fig. 3(d)). These data can point out that two
tunable emissionmodes individuallygenerate two explicit emission
colors thanks to the AIE molecule with intramolecular charge
transfer profile derived from the electron-withdrawing nature of
o-carborane.
Conclusions
In summary, a novel ditopic bisterpyridyl ligand containing o-
carborane was successfully synthesized, and it efficiently un-
derwent complexation with metal ions, thus the construction
DFT calculations
In order to provide effective understanding for their emission-
switching property between ILCT and AIE, the electronic states of
TPYOCB and its Zn(II) (2 : 1) complex ([Zn2(TPYOCB)](OAc)2)
were investigated by theoretical calculations performed with
the Gaussian 03 suit program using density-functional theory
(DFT) method at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)//B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)
level.10 The lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of
TPYOCB is mainly located on the phenylene-ethynylene unit with
distribution of electron in the o-carborane cluster, while that of
the Zn complex has more distribution in the terpyridine unit
instead of o-carborane due to the electron-withdrawing character
of terpyridine as a result of complexation. Additionally, the
calculated LUMO level of TPYOCB and the Zn complex was
-2.12 eV and -2.77 eV, respectively (Fig. 4), which showed good
correlation with the electrochemical data (-2.40 eV and -2.96
eV, respectively). Next, time-dependent (TD) SCF calculations
using DFT method were carried out to provide further insight
1
of supramolecular structure. H NMR, UV-vis, and fluorescent
titration data clearly display smooth complexation of the obtained
bisterpyridine molecule with Zn(II) ions. Furthermore, a bare
ligand molecule exhibited aggregation-induced emission (AIE) in
a poor solvent such as water, and coordination to metal ions caused
switching of the emission mode to the intraligand charge transfer
(ILCT) state, which was also supported by DFT calculations. As
a result, the emission color was drastically turned from green-
yellow to light blue due to the change of emission modes upon
the complexation. These two convertible emission modes and
the reversible coordination chemistry may find utility in sensory
materials or stimuli-responsive fluorophores.
References
1 (a) L. Brunsveld, B. J. B. Folmer, E. W. Meijer and R. P. Sijbesma,
Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 4071; (b) S. Kitagawa, R. Kitaura and S.-i.
Noro, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 2334; (c) R. D. Archer, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 1993, 128, 49; (d) J. M. Lehn, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.,
1988, 27, 89.
2 (a) U. S. Schubert and C. Eschbaumer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002,
41, 2892; (b) J. B. Beck and S. J. Rowan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125,
13922; (c) I. Manners, Science, 2001, 294, 1664.
3 (a) J.-P. Sauvage, J.-P. Collin, J.-C. Chambron, S. Guillerez and C.
Coudret, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94, 993; (b) H. Hofmeier and U. S. Schubert,
Chem. Commun., 2005, 2423; (c) H. Hofmeier, R. Hoogenboom,
M. E. L. Wouters and U. S. Schubert, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
2913; (d) M. Chiper, A. Winter, R. Hoogenboom, D. A. M. Egbe, D.
Wouters, S. Hoeppener, C.-A. Fustin, J.-F. Gohy and U. S. Schubert,
Macromolecules, 2008, 41, 8823; (e) P. R. Andres and U. S. Schubert,
Adv. Mater., 2004, 16, 1043; (f) F. S. Han, M. Higuchi and D. G. Kurth,
Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, 3928; (g) R. R. Pal, M. Higuchi and D. G. Kurth,
Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 3562; (h) S.-C. Yu, C.-C. Kwok, W.-K. Chan and
C.-M. Che, Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 1643; (i) D. Knapton, S. J. Rowan and
C. Weder, Macromolecules, 2006, 39, 651; (j) G. Gro¨ger, V. Stepanenko,
F. Wu¨rthner and C. Schmuck, Chem. Commun., 2009, 698.
¨
4 (a) A. O. Bozdemir, O. Bu¨yu¨kcakir and E. U. Akkaya, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2009, 15, 3830; (b) R. Dobrawa, M. Lysetska, P. Ballester, M. Gru¨ne
and F. Wu¨rthner, Macromolecules, 2005, 38, 1315; (c) Y.-Y. Chen,
Y. T. Tao and H.-C. Lin, Macromolecules, 2006, 39, 8559; (d) A. A.
Maier, R. Rabindranath and B. Tieke, Adv. Mater., 2009, 21, 959; (e) A.
Harriman, J. P. Rostron, M. Cesario, G. Ulrich and R. Ziessel, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 2006, 110, 7994.
Fig. 4 Structure and molecular orbital diagrams for (a) LUMO and
HOMO of TPYOCB and (b) LUMO + 1 and HOMO - 10 of
[Zn2(TPYOCB)](OAc)2.
5 (a) X.-y. Wang, A. D. Guerzo and R. H. Schmehl, Chem. Commun.,
2002, 2344; (b) X. Piao, Y. Zou, J. Wu, C. Li and T. Yi, Org. Lett., 2009,
1922 | Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 1919–1923
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©