the chemical shift of alkene-H in E-4b is more down-field than Z-
4b, since in E-4b the ester group is at the cis-position of alkene-H,
which can provide a greater deshielding effect. In the same way,
we could assign the Z and E isomer of 3. The intramolecular
radical cyclisation of 4b (Z/E = 1 : 1) with Bu3SnH and AIBN
proved to be a little complicated, and 3,4-methylenedioxy-8-
methoxyphenanthrene-1,10-dicarboxylic acid dimethyl ester 5 was
separated in a yield of 30%. The main by-product separated was
4a. Treating the Z isomer of 4b in the same condition could
afford 5 only in 10%, which also accounted for the low yield
of the reaction above. Nonetheless, 5 was obtained easily and
then converted to its corresponding dicarboxylic acid papilistatin
through saponification in a yield of 85%.
The resulting mixture was cooled to 0 ◦C and acidified with 2 mol
L-1 hydrochloric acid, then filtered, washed with water and dried
to gi◦ve 3.17 g (92%) of 3 (Z/E = 1 : 1) as a white solid. mp 176–
1
179 C; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.59 (s, 1 H, C CH),
7.56 (s, 1 H, C CH), 7.55 (s, 1 H, Ar–H), 7.22 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H,
Ar–H), 7.12–7.17 (m, 2 H, Ar–H), 7.06 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H),
7.02 (s, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.75 (s, 1 H,
Ar–H), 6.62 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.42 (s, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.11
(s, 2 H, OCH2O), 5.97 (s, 2 H, OCH2O), 3.80 (s, 6 H, COOCH3),
3.51 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 3.46 (s, 3 H, OCH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3) d 171.0, 170.5, 167.1, 166.3, 157.8, 156.9, 147.5, 147.1,
137.8, 137.5, 135.0, 134.2, 133.9, 130.0, 129.4, 126.9, 125.2, 124.4,
124.3, 123.6, 122.0, 112.3, 110.7, 110.6, 109.5, 102.2, 101.9, 56.0,
55.2, 52.2, 51.4. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C19H15BrO7 [M - H]-
432.9928, found 432.9922.
Conclusion
Papilistatin was first synthesized from easily available materials
1 and 2b under mild conditions in only 4 steps with an overall
yield of 23%. The chemistry described here provides a practical
synthetic method of papilistatin, with which we could also prepare
diversities of papilistatin for biochemical and pharmaceutical
studies.
(Z/E)-3-(2-Bromo-6-methoxyphenyl)-2-(2-methoxycarbonyl-4,5-
methylenedioxyphenyl)-acrylic acid methyl ester (4b)
Compound 3 (3.17 g, 7.30 mmol) was dissolved in dry
◦
dichloromethane (40 mL) and cooled to 0 C and then carefully
treated with diazomethane until the reaction had finished. The
excess diazomethane was decomposed with a few drops of glacial
acetic acid. The resulting mixture was evaporated to afford 3.31 g
(98%) of 4b as a white oil. A little of the Z isomer of 4b could
be obtained through column chromatography (petroleum ether–
Experimental
The melting points were determined with an X-4 binocular
microscope melting-point apparatus (Beijing Tech Instruments
Co, Beijing, China) and were uncorrected. 1H NMR spectra were
obtained by using a Bruker AV 400 spectrometer. Chemical shifts
(d) were given in parts per million (ppm) and were measured
downfield from internal tetramethylsilane.13C NMR spectra were
recorded by using a Bruker AV 400 (100 MHz) and CDCl3, C5D5N
or DMSO-d6 as a solvent. Chemical shifts (d) are reported in
parts per million using the solvent peak. High-resolution mass
spectra were obtained with an FT-ICR MS spectrometer (Ionspec,
7.0 T). All anhydrous solvents were dried and purified by standard
techniques just before use.
1
EtOAc, 8 : 1, v/v). For 4b (Z/E = 1 : 1): H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3): d 7.52 (s, 1 H, C CH), 7.48 (s, 1 H, C CH), 7.46 (s, 1
H, Ar–H), 7.20 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 7.12 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1
H, Ar–H), 7.11 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 7.02 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1
H, Ar–H), 6.98 (s, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H),
6.69 (s, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.59 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.38 (s, 1
H, Ar–H), 6.06 (s, 2 H, OCH2O), 5.92 (s, 2 H, OCH2O), 3.84 (s,
3 H, COOCH3), 3.79 (s, 6 H, COOCH3), 3.78 (s, 3 H, COOCH3),
3.52 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 3.41 (s, 3 H, OCH3); For the Z isomer of 4b:
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.48 (s, 1 H, C CH), 7.20 (d,
J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 7.13 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.99 (s,
1 H, Ar–H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.69 (s, 1 H, Ar–
H), 6.07 (s, 2 H, OCH2O), 3.79 (s, 3 H, COOCH3), 3.78 (s, 3 H,
COOCH3), 3.52 (s, 3 H, OCH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d
167.2, 166.0, 156.9, 150.2, 147.0, 137.8, 133.9, 133.7, 130.0, 125.1,
124.3, 124.2, 122.9, 110.4, 109.9, 109.5, 101.9, 55.1, 52.1, 51.8.
HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C20H17BrO7 [M + Na]+ 471.0050, found
471.0052.
2-Methoxycarbonyl-4,5-methylenedioxyphenylacetic acid methyl
ester (1)
Compound 11 (1.81 g, 8.10 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (15 mL)
was cooled to 0 ◦C and then carefully treated with diazomethane
until the reaction had finished. The excess diazomethane was
decomposed with a few drops of glacial acetic acid. The resulting
mixture was evaporated to afford 2.00 g (98%) of 1 as a white solid.
mp 87–88 ◦C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.49 (s, 1 H, Ph-H),
6.71 (s, 1 H, Ph-H), 6.03 (s, 2 H, OCH2O), 3.93 (s, 2 H, Ph-CH2-),
3.83 (s, 3 H, COOCH3), 3.70 (s, 3 H, COOCH3); 13C NMR (100
MHz, CDCl3) d 172.0, 166.6, 150.8, 146.8, 132,3, 122.7, 112.1,
110.7, 101.9, 51.9, 40.4. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C12H12O6 [M +
Na]+ 275.0526, found 275.0527.
3,4-Methylenedioxy-8-methoxyphenanthrene-1,10-dicarboxylic
acid dimethyl ester (5)
To a solution of 4b (3.31 g, 7.16 mmol) in toluene (200 mL),
AIBN (0.23 mg, 1.43 mmol) and Bu3SnH (5.00 g, 17.18 mmol)
were added, and the mixture was heated under reflux for 6 h.
The reaction mixture was concentrated by rotary evaporation,
and purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether–EtOAc,
10 : 1, v/v) to give 0.82 g (30%) of 5 as a yellow solid. mp 212–
213 ◦C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.68 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H,
H-5), 8.67 (s, 1 H, H-9), 7.71 (s, 1 H, H-2), 7.63 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H,
H-6), 7.06 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H-7), 6.32 (s, 2 H, OCH2O), 4.04
(s, 3 H, OCH3), 3.92 (s, 3 H, COOCH3), 3.90 (s, 3 H, COOCH3);
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 169.4, 168.8, 156.1, 146.6, 144.9,
(Z/E)-3-(2-Bromo-6-methoxyphenyl)-2-(2-carboxyl-4,5-
methylenedioxyphenyl)-acrylic acid methyl ester (3)
Sodium (0.19 g, 8.10 mmol) was stirred in methanol (80 mL) until
it disappeared. 1 (2.00 g, 7.94 mmol) and 2b (1.73 g, 8.10 mmol)
were added to the solution. The mixture was heated at reflux for
4 h and then rotary evaporated to remove most of the methanol.
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 2539–2542 | 2541
©