R. D. Gogliotti et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 26 (2016) 2984–2987
2985
metabolic stability of these compounds, presumably due to a shift
of the site of instability to other areas of the molecule (Table 2).
Next, we turned our efforts to eliminating the benzylic site alto-
gether by evaluating a series of phenyl sulfonamides. Much like the
benzyl derivatives, the phenylsulfonamides were well tolerated as
a substituent. Alkyl substituted pyrrole sulfonamides were the
most potent of the series (11l, EC50 = 122 nM; 11m, EC50 = 104 nM;
11r, EC50 = 62 nM), with the halogen substituted analogs being less
potent (e.g., 11n, EC50 = 740 nM; 11o, EC50 = 1238 nM). Some
potency could be recaptured by the addition of an alkyl group as
in 11t (EC50 = 163 nM) and 11u (EC50 = 268 nM). The pyrazole moi-
ety was also tolerated as a phenyl replacement (Table 3).
O
O
O
O
S
S
O
N
O
H
N
Cl
N
Cl
N
H
Cl
N
H
2
VU0366674,
hmGlu4 EC50 = 237 nM
1
VU0364439,
hmGlu4 EC50 = 19.8 nM
O
O
N
H
S
O
N
Cl
N
H
4PAM2, 3
Having established the pyrrole scaffold as a novel phenyl
replacement as mGlu4 PAMs, we next evaluated the compounds
in our battery of Tier 1 in vitro PK assays (Table 4). The intrinsic
clearance (CLINT) was assessed in rat hepatic microsomes and the
subsequent predicted hepatic clearance (CLHEP) was calculated.23,32
Many of the compounds displayed high intrinsic and predicted
hepatic clearance, except for the 3,4-dimethylphenyl analog,
11r, which had moderate predicted hepatic clearance
(CLHEP = 38.3 mL/min/kg). Utilizing an equilibrium dialysis
approach, the protein binding of the compounds was evaluated
in rat plasma. The fraction unbound (Fu) of the analogs tested
was very low, except, again, in the case of 11r which showed
slightly better unbound fraction (Fu = 0.012).
hmGlu4 EC50 = 162 nM
Figure 1. Previously disclosed phenylsulfonamide and phenylsulfone mGlu4 PAMs.
EC50 = 217 nM). Overall, the replacement of the phenyl group with
a thiazole was a productive change in terms of potency with 7c
being one of the most potent compounds discovered to date
(EC50 = 83 nM). The sulfide intermediates, 6, were tested and were
significantly less potent (EC50’s = 5000–8000 nM); the sulfoxides
were not tested as the oxidation procedure led directly to the
sulfones. Unfortunately, these compounds suffered from signifi-
cant pharmacokinetic liabilities (poor brain penetration, metabolic
instability) limiting the utility of these compounds to in vitro tool
compounds.
Lastly, we evaluated two analogs in an in vivo IV clearance
experiment in order to assess whether the in vitro data would be
Next, we turned our attention to other replacement groups,
namely, pyrrole and pyrazole.28,29 The synthesis of these groups
is detailed in Scheme 2. The nitro pyrrole (or pyrazole) was con-
verted to the sulfonamide (DBU, RSO2Cl) and then the nitro was
reduced to the amino compound using Raney Nickel, 10 (EtOH,
Ra–Ni, 40 psi H2). The final compounds were completed via acyla-
tion of the amino group with the acid chloride (picolinyl chloride,
DIEA) yielding the desired compounds, 11a–w.30,31
The initial set of compounds evaluated were the benzyl sulfon-
amides, comparators to the thiazole benzylsulfones. Similar to the
thiazole core compounds, the pyrrole compounds were well toler-
ated, with the 2-chlorobenzyl sulfonamide being equipotent to the
thiazole (7a) and phenyl (2) derivatives (11g, EC50 = 174 nM). As
seen previously, most of the benzyl compounds that we evaluated
were active as mGlu4 PAMs with most EC50’s < 500 nM. Although
these compounds were active as PAMs, they suffered from the
same PK liabilities as the thiazole compounds, namely, metabolic
stability issues. It was determined that oxidation of the benzylic
CH2 group was the major metabolic liability and efforts were
undertaken to block this site. Thus, compounds 11i–k were synthe-
sized. Unfortunately, these compounds were significantly less
potent as mGlu4 PAMs, with the mono-fluoro compound being
the most active (11j, EC50 = 1024 nM). In addition, blocking the
presumed site of metabolism did not inherently improve the
Table 1
SAR of the sulfonylthiazoles, 7a–h
R1
O
N
R2
S
O
N
O
S
N
H
7a-h
a
Compd R1
R2
mGlu4 EC50
(nM)
pEC50 SEMa %GluMaxb
Cl
Cl
F
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
H
189
448
83
6.72 0.13
30.6 0.5
94.8 3.6
35.1 1.2
112.5 1.6
119.9 1.3
93.5 1.8
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
Me
H
6.35 0.06
7.08 0.14
5.38 0.06
6.66 0.09
6.26 0.05
Cl
Cl
Cl
F
F
Me
Et
4137
217
547
F
R
F
R
b
O
N
a
Me
N
Br
N
c
Br
S
N
H
S
F
H2N
O
5
4
7g
7h
Me
Et
295
150
6.53 0.09
6.82 0.12
99.3 1.7
R1
R
R1
F
F
R
O
N
S
O
N
N
O
S
N
H
S
N
∗
109.0 1.4
S
N
7a-h
6
H
F
a
Calcium mobilization human mGlu4 assay; values are the average of n = 3.
Amplitude of response in the presence of 30 lM test compound, normalized to
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions. (a) Picolinyl chlorideÁHCl, diisopropylethy-
lamine, CH2Cl2, 24–39%; (b) Pd2(dba)3, XantPhos, HSCH2Ar, diisopropylethylamine,
1,4-dioxane, 100 °C, 51–87%; (c) m-CPBA, CH2Cl2, 38–87%.
b
a standard compound, PHCCC, and represented as %GluMax.