Goshe, P. J. Wesson, S. T. Nguyen, J. T. Hupp and D. M. Tiede, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 836–838.
8 K. N. Houk, A. G. Leach, S. P. Kim and X. Zhang, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2003, 42, 4872–4897.
9 D. H. Williams, E. Stephens, D. P. O’Brien and M. Zhou, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 6596–6616.
10 (a) S. Otto, Dalton Trans., 2006, 23, 2861–2864; (b) Z. Rodriguez-
Docampo, S. I. Pascu, S. Kubik and S. Otto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006,
128, 11206–11210.
Zadmart, M. Junkers, T. Schrader, T. Grawe and A. Kraft, J. Org.
Chem., 2003, 68, 6511–6521.
18 L. Kovbasyuk and R. Kra¨mer, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 3161–3187.
19 Recognition systems with allosteric guest responses have a great im-
portance in biology, as they are involved in activation, regulation, and
information-transmission phenomena. See: J. M. Berg, J. L. Tymoczko,
L. Stryer in Biochemistry, 5th ed., W. H. Freeman, New York, 2002.
20 (a) U. Darbost, M. Giorgi, N. Hucher, I. Jabin and O. Reinaud,
Supramol. Chem., 2005, 17, 243–250; (b) U. Darbost, X. Zeng, M.
Giorgi and I. Jabin, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 10552–10560.
21 S. Le Gac, M. Luhmer, O. Reinaud and I. Jabin, Tetrahedron, 2007, 63,
10721–10730.
11 It is worth mentioning that rather flexible subunits have been used
to form dynamic combinatorial librairies of capsule-like receptors
via metal–ligand interactions, see: (a) M. Albrecht, O. Blau and R.
Frohlich, Chem.–Eur. J., 1999, 5, 48–56; (b) M. Albrecht, I. Janser, J.
Runsink, G. Raabe, P. Weis and R. Frohlich, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2004, 43, 6662–6666; (c) M. Ziegler, J. J. Miranda, U. N. Andersen,
D. W. Johnson, J. A. Leary and K. N. Raymond, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2001, 40, 733–736; (d) Y. Kubota, S. Sakamoto, K. Yamaguchi and
M. Fujita, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2002, 99, 4854–4856.
12 (a) C. D. Gutsche, in Calixarenes An introduction, Monographs in:
Supramolecular Chemistry, ed. J. F. Stoddart, The Royal Society
of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2nd edn, 2008; (b) C. D. Gutsche, in
Calixarenes Revisited, Monographs in: Supramolecular Chemistry, ed.
J. F. Stoddart, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1998.
13 (a) I. Jabin and O. Reinaud, J. Org. Chem., 2003, 68, 3416–3419; (b) U.
Darbost, M. Giorgi, O. Reinaud and I. Jabin, J. Org. Chem., 2004,
69, 4879–4884; (c) X. Zeng, N. Hucher, O. Reinaud and I. Jabin,
J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 6886–6889; (d) E. Garrier, S. Le Gac and
I. Jabin, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2005, 16, 3767–3771; (e) X. Zeng,
D. Coquie`re, A. Alenda, E. Garrier, T. Prange´, Y. Li, O. Reinaud and
I. Jabin, Chem.–Eur. J., 2006, 12, 6393–6402; (f) S. Le Gac, X. Zeng,
C. Girardot and I. Jabin, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 9233–9236; (g) S. Le
Gac, M. Me´nand and I. Jabin, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 5195–5198; (h) S.
Le Gac and I. Jabin, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 548–557; (i) M. Me´nand
and I. Jabin, Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 2159–2169; (j) A. Lascaux, S. Le
Gac, J. Wouters, M. Luhmer and I. Jabin, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8,
4607–4616.
22 S. Le Gac, M. Giorgi and I. Jabin, Supramol. Chem., 2007, 19, 185–
197.
23 For rare examples of tubular tail-to-tail bis-calix[6]arenes featuring a
triple covalent linkage, see: (a) S. Le Gac, X. Zeng, O. Reinaud and
I. Jabin, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 1204–1210; (b) S. Moerkerke, M.
Me´nand and I. Jabin, Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 11712–11719.
24 S. Le Gac, J. Marrot, O. Reinaud and I. Jabin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2006, 45, 3123–3126.
25 S. Le Gac, M. Me´nand and I. Jabin, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 5195–5198.
26 S. Le Gac, J. Marrot and I. Jabin, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 3316–3322.
27 S.-K. Chang and I. Cho, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1986, 211–214.
28 I. Alam and C. D. Gutsche, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 4487–4489.
29 J. Wang and C. D. Gutsche, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 12226–12231.
30 See the Supporting Information†.
31 The signal of the OCH2 protons was highfield shifted as compared to
4, attesting to the deprotonation of the COOH groups. The addition
+
of an excess of PrNH3 picrate salt to a CDCl3 solution of 4 led, after
sonication, to the extraction of 3 equiv. of the ammonium ion and to
the quantitative formation of the endo-complex 4PrNH3+
2PrNH3+. In that case,
the chemical shift of the CH2O protons was not affected by the addition
of the ammonium ion.
32 A C3v symmetrical pattern is observed below 243 K.
33 It is noteworthy that such a supramolecular control of the conformation
of calix[6]arenes that lack the p-tBu groups is extremely rare. See: J. C.
Iglesias-Sanchez, B. Souto, C. J. Pastor, J. de Mendoza and P. Prados,
J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 10400–10407.
34 The addition of more than one equiv. of the ammonium guest disrupted
the quaternary assemblies while a large excess of IMI (> 20 equiv.) was
tolerated.
35 In all cases, all the signals of these NMR spectra were assigned thanks
to 2D NMR spectra (see the Supporting Information†).
36 This ratio is deduced from the integration of the high-field signals of
the guests.
14 (a) S. Blanchard, L. Le Clainche, M.-N. Rager, B. Chansou, J.-P.
Tuchagues, A. F. Duprat, Y. Le Mest and O. Reinaud, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 2732–2735; (b) O. Se´ne`que, M.-N. Rager, M. Giorgi
and O. Reinaud, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 6183–6189; (c) O.
Reinaud, Y. Le Mest, I. Jabin inCalixarenes in the Nanoworld, ed.
J. Vicens and J. Harrowfield, Springer-Verlag, The Netherlands, 2006,
pp. 259-285; (d) D. Coquie`re, S. Le Gac, U. Darbost, O. Se´ne`que, I.
Jabin and O. Reinaud, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2009, 7, 2485–2500 and
references therein.
15 (a) A. Arduini, R. Ferdani, A. Pochini, Secchi and F. Ugozzoli, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3453–3456; (b) A. Arduini, F. Calzavacca, A.
Pochini and A. Secchi, Chem.–Eur. J., 2003, 9, 793–799; (c) M. Hamon,
M. Me´nand, S. Le Gac, M. Luhmer, V. Dalla and I. Jabin, J. Org. Chem.,
2008, 73, 7067–7071.
16 (a) U. Darbost, M.-N. Rager, S. Petit, I. Jabin and O. Reinaud, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 8517–8525; (b) D. Coquie`re, J. Marrot and O.
Reinaud, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2008, 6, 3930–3934. See also ref. 13f.
17 (a) A. Arduini, L. Domiano, L. Ogliosi, A. Pochini, A. Secchi and
R. Ungaro, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 7866–7868; (b) J. J. Gonzalez, R.
Ferdani, E. Albertini, J. M. Blasco, A. Arduini, A. Pochini, P. Prados
and J. de Mendoza, Chem.–Eur. J., 2000, 6, 73–80; (c) A. M. Rincon,
P. Prados and J. de Mendoza, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2002, 640–644; (d) R.
37 The average chemical shift of the OCH2 protons of 4 was high-
3H+
field shifted in the case of 1 ·4
IMI
-4H+
compared to the assembly
PrNH3+
3H+
IMI
-3H+
PrNH3+
1
·4
,Pic- (dOCH2 = 4.49 vs. 4.52 ppm, respectively). This is in
agreement with the deprotonation of an additional carboxylic acid
group.
38 The addition of an excess of PrNH2 (3 equiv.) disrupted the quaternary
-nH+
assembly and led to the complex 4
as the major species. Also, the
PrNH3+
use of a calix[6]hexa-amine as the partner for the calix[6]hexa-acid 4
did not lead to a discrete assembly.
39 Although not soluble in chloroform, calix[6]hexa-acid 5 was fully
extracted in the presence of calix[6]tris-amine 1.
40 For a recent review on ion-pair receptors, see: S. K. Kim and J. L.
Sessler, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 3784–3809.
2396 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 2387–2396
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©