6904
M. P. Catalani et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 6899–6904
6. Herpfer, I.; Lieb, K. CNS Drugs 2005, 19, 275.
min. DAD:210-340 nM to give according to the order of elution 15a (anti
enantiomer 1) and 15b (anti enantiomer 2).
22. Compound 19 was separated using the following chiral HPLC preparative
7. Meltzer, H. Y.; Arvanitis, L.; Bauer, D.; Rein, W. Am. J. Psychiatry 2004, 161, 975.
8. Dawson, L. A.; Smith, P. W. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010, 16, 344.
9. (a) Hoffmann, T.; Koblet, A.; Peters, J.U.; Schnider, P.; Sleight, A.; Stadler, H. PCT
Int. Appl.,WO2005002577, 2005; (b) Bissantz, C.; Hoffmann, T.; Jablonski, P.;
Knust, H.; Nettekoven, M.; Ratni, H.; Wu, X. PCT Int. Appl., WO2008128891,
2008.
conditions: Column: Chiralpak IC (20 mm  250mm,
70:30 v/v pump-mixed; Flow rate = 17.0 ml/min; UV absorbance 215 nM;
Autosampler injection (500 l of 140.0 mg/ml sample in DCM/MeOH 8:2 on
5 lm); Heptane: IPA
l
column); isocratic run time = 50.0 min.
10. Schnider, P. PCT Int. Appl., WO2006013050, 2006.
11. Alvaro, G.; Andreotti, D.; Belvedere, S.; Di Fabio, R.; Falchi, A.; Giovannini, R.
PCT Int. Appl.,WO2007028654, 2007.
23. Silverman, R. B.; Nanavati, S. M. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 931.
24. Compounds 21a and 22b were isolated (in order of elution) from the mixture of
four diasteroisomers using the following preparative chiral HPLC conditions:
12. (a) Peters, J. U.; Hoffmann, T.; Schnider, P.; Stadler, H.; Koblet, A.; Alker, A.; Poli,
S. M.; Ballard, T. M.; Spooren, W.; Steward, L.; Sleight, A. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2010, 20, 3405; (b) Ratni, H.; Ballard, T. M.; Bissants, C.; Hoffmann, T.;
Jablonski, P.; Knoflach, F.; Knust, H.; Malherbe, P.; Nettekoven, M.; Patiny-
Adam, A.; Riemer, C.; Schmitt, M.; Spooren, W. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20,
6735.
13. Structures were modeled within the Maestro [A] modeling environment.
Conformational analyses were carried out with BatchMin [B] using the
following parameters: 1000 steps/rotatable bond, OPLS_2005 FF, implicit
water model of solvation, 10000 minimisation steps with PRCG, relative energy
window for the minimized conformers within 3 kcal/mol. On the left hand side
of the compounds, H-bond acceptor (A2, A3) and donor (D4) pharmacophore
features were mapped using the Phase [C] module within Maestro.
[A] Maestro V8.5.111 (Schrodinger LLC).
Column: Chiralpak IA (20 mm  250mm, 5
90:10 v/v pump-mixed; Flow rate = 17.0 ml/min; UV Absorbance 215 nM;
Autosampler injection (900 l of 95.0 mg/ml sample in DCM:MeOH 8:2 on
column); isocratic run time = 50.0 min. The mixture of 21b and 22a was
subsequently separated (in order of elution) according the following chiral
lm); Heptane: Absolute Ethanol
l
HPLC condition: Column: Chiralpak IC (20 mm  250mm, 5
70:30 v/v pump-mixed; Flow rate = 17.0 ml/min; UV Absorbance 215 nM;
Autosampler injection (900 l of 95.0 mg/ml sample in DCM/MeOH 8:2 on
lm); Heptane: IPA
l
column); isocratic run time = 60.0 min.
25. The functional activity of compounds was tested on recombinant human NK1
or NK3 receptors, transiently expressed in U2-OS cells using the BacMam
methodology (see: Condreay, P.J.; Witherspoon, S.M.; Clay, W.C.; Kost, T.A.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 127). Compound modulation of
intracellular calcium levels induced by an EC80 concentration of Substance P,
or Neurokinin B, for NK1 or NK3 receptors, respectively, was assessed using
FLIPR/Ca2+ methodology (see: Sullivan, E.; Tucker, E.M.; Dale, I.L. In Calcium
Signaling Protocols: Lambert D.G., Ed.: Humana, Totowa, 1999; pp 125–133).
The Cheng–Prusoff equation was used to calculate functional pKi (fpKi) values
from the pIC50 values.
26. Different categories of receptor antagonists have been described. Some
antagonists produce parallel rightward shifts of the agonist concentration-
response curve, without affecting the maximal response. These are classified as
surmountable antagonists (Gaddum, J.H.; Hameed, K.A.; Hathway, D.E.;
Stephens, F.F. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. 1955, 40, 49). Insurmountable antagonists
are able to depress the maximal response.
[B] BatchMinV9.6 (Schrodinger LLC).
[C] Phase V3.0.110 (Schrodinger LLC).
14. Bromidge, S.M.; Catalani, M.P.; Heer J.P.; Smethurst, C. A. P.; Tommasi, S. PCT
Int. Appl, WO 2011054773, 2011.
15. Jones, P.; Pryde, C.; Fran, T.-D. PCT Int. Appl., WO2007093901, 2007.
16. Chan, B. K.; Cinfolini, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8489.
17. Metten, B.; Kostermans, M.; Van Baelen, G.; Smet, M.; Dehaen, W. Tetrahedron
2006, 62, 6018.
18. Felluga, F.; Fermeglia, M.; Ferrone, M.; Pitacco, G.; Pricl, S.; Valentin, E. Helv.
Chim. Acta 2002, 8, 4046.
19. The four stereoisomers obtained by reduction of 7 were separated by chiral
SFC. Preparative chromatography conditions: [Column: ChiralPak AD-H
(25 Â 2.1 cm); Modifier: 12% (EtOH + 0.1% isopropylamine) 12%, 15% after
27. Lindström, E.; Von Mentzer, B.; Påhlman, I.; Ahlstedt, I.; Uvebrant, A.;
Kristensson, E.; Martinsson, R.; Novén, A.; De Verdier, J.; Vauquelin, G. J.
Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2007, 322, 1286.
third peak; Flow rate 50.0 ml/min; UV detection 220 nM; Loop 500 ll].
Injection of 10 mg in the modifier to give in order to elution: 8a, 9a, 8b, and 9b.
20. Yan, L.; Budhu, R.; Huo, P.; Lynch, C. L.; Hale, J. J.; Mills, S. G.; Hajdu, R.;
Keohane, C. A.; Rosenbach, M. J.; Milligan, J. M.; Shei, G.-J.; Chrebet, G.;
Bergstrom, J.; Card, D.; Mandela, S. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem Lett. 2006, 16, 3564.
28. Four selected compound concentrations (0.3–1–3–10 nM and 3–10–30–
100 nM in the NK1 and NK3 assays, respectively) were tested in the
presence of 15 different agonist concentrations (Substance P, or Neurokinin
B, for NK1 or NK3 receptors, respectively), to assess
a compounds
21. Preparative
chromatographic
conditions:
Column:
ChiralPak
AD-H
surmountable/insurmountable profile. Agonist Emax in the presence of two
(25 Â 0.46 cm); Mobile phase: n-hexane/EtOH 65/35% v/v; Flow rate: 0.8 ml/
selected test compound concentrations is shown in Tables 2 and 3.