3134
H.A. Lim et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 46 (2011) 3130e3134
and stirred at 25 ꢁC for 1 h. The resulting dipeptide was purified by
flash chromatography using a CH2Cl2/methanol gradient monitored
using MS. The solvent was removed in vacuo to give a colourless oil
(157 mg, 0.20 mmol, 83%). 2-(biphenyl-4-yl)acetic acid (0.22 mmol,
regression fit by selecting the competitive inhibition model in
GraphPad Prism 5 software.
4.2.3. Thrombin inhibition assay
43 mg), HBTU (0.44 mmol, 167 mg), DIPEA (0.66 mmol, 113
m
L) and
The thrombin inhibitory assay was performed using the Anas-
pec SensoLyte AFC thrombin assay kit (USA). Thrombin (40 nM) and
DMF (10 mL) were added to the oil and the mixture was stirred at
25 ꢁC, 30 min. The contents were dissolved in ethyl acetate (30 mL)
and washed with brine (50 mL) thrice. The organic phase was
removed in vacuo to give a cloudy gel. The resulting N-capped
dipeptide was purified by flash chromatography using a CH2Cl2/
methanol gradient and monitored at 254 nm. The solvent was
removed in vacuo to give a colourless oil (141 mg, 0.144 mmol, 72%)
before being dissolved in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) and stirred with TFA (1 mL)
at 25 ꢁC, 30 min. The mixture was dried under a N2 stream, re-
dissolved in methanol (1 mL) and purified by HPLC (water and
acetonitrile solvent) to give the target product (51 mg, 0.088 mmol,
the inhibitor (100 m
M) was incubated in a reaction buffer at 25 ꢁC
for 1 h before addition of the AFC thrombin substrate. The reaction
was monitored at 25 ꢁC by measuring fluorescence intensity
(lex380 nm and lem500 nm) every 45 s for 1 h on a SpectraMax
Gemini XS plate reader. The thrombin inhibitor NAPAP (N-2-
naphthylsulfonyl-glycyl-4-amidinophenylalanine-piperidide) was
used as positive control.
4.3. Molecular modelling software
61%). Spectral data: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD)
d 1.29e1.96
Molecular modelling and energy minimization were performed
using Chem3D Ultra (v.10) software (ChembridgeSoft, USA).
(16H, m), 2.82e3.23 (8H, m), 3.64 (2H, s, AreCH2eCOe), 4.21e4.31
(2H, m,
CD3OD)
a
d
-Hs), 7.30e7.62 (9H, m, aromatics); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
22.4, 22.5, 25.7, 26.0, 26.5, 26.7, 28.1, 30.0, 30.5, 38.4, 39.1,
Acknowledgements
40.7, 41.6, 53.1, 53.9, 126.4, 126.8, 127.1, 128.6, 129.4, 134.5, 139.8,
140.5, 157.3, 172.7, 173.0, 173.2. ESI-TOF-MS: m/z calc C31H49N8O3
(M þ Hþ) 581.3922, found 581.3918.
We thank A*STAR Biomedical Research Council for financial
support, Dr. Manfred Raida for mass spectrometry analysis,
Dr. Thomas Keller and Dr. Michael Entzeroth for critical reading of
the manuscript.
4.2. Biological activities
4.2.1. WNV NS2B/NS3 enzyme inhibition assay
Appendix. Supplementary material
WNV NS2B/NS3 inhibitory assays were based on published work
[10] and performed in a buffer at pH 8.0 containing TriseHCl
(10 mM), CHAPS (1 mM) and glycerol (20% v/v). The enzyme
(20 nM) and varying concentrations of inhibitor were next added
and pre-incubated at 25 ꢁC for 1 h. The reaction was initiated by the
addition of the fluorogenic peptide substrate Pyr-RTKR-AMC
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
(Bachem, Switzerland) to make a final concentration of 20
mM.
[1] L.H. Gould, E. Fikrig, J. Clin. Invest. 113 (2004) 1102e1107.
[2] L.D. Kramer, J. Li, P.-Y. Shi, Lancet Neurol. 6 (2007) 171e181.
[4] L.R. Petersen, A.A. Marfin, Ann. Intern. Med. 137 (2002) 173e179.
[5] S. Mukhopadhyay, R.J. Kuhn, M.G. Rossmann, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3 (2005)
13e22.
[6] K.J. Chappell, M.J. Stoermer, D.P. Fairlie, P.R. Young, J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006)
38448e38458.
[7] J.E. Knox, N.L. Ma, Z. Yin, S.J. Patel, W.-L. Wang, W.-L. Chan, K.R.R. Rao,
G. Wamg, X. Ngew, V. Patel, D. Beer, S.P. Lim, S.G. Vasudevan, T.H. Keller,
J. Med. Chem. 49 (2006) 6585e6590.
The reaction components were shaken for 5 s and the reaction
progress monitored at 37 ꢁC by measuring the increase in fluores-
cence (lex355 nm and lem460 nm) every 45 s for 1 h on a Spec-
traMax Gemini XS plate reader (USA). Experiments were done in
duplicates. IC50 values were derived by fitting the initial velocity
against the log [inhibitor] with a sigmoidal dose response curve
using GraphPad Prism 5 software. Nona-D-Arg-NH2 peptide (Gen-
Script, USA) was used as positive control.
[8] C.G. Noble, Y.-L. Chen, H. Dong, F. Gu, S.P. Lim, W. Schul, Q.-Y. Wang, P.-Y. Shi,
Antivir. Res. 85 (2010) 451e462.
4.2.2. Kinetic measurements for Ki determination
The most potent inhibitor (compound 2) was incubated at
various concentrations (0, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 70 mM) at pH 8.0 with
WNV NS2B/NS3 protease (20 nM), TriseHCl (10 mM), CHAPS
(1 mM) and glycerol (20% v/v) at 25 ꢁC for 1 h. Next, the substrate
Pyr-RTKR-AMC (Bachem, Switzerland) was added at different
[9] C.E. Samuel, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 11555e11557.
[10] T.A. Nall, K.J. Chappell, M.J. Stoermer, N.X. Fang, J.D. Tyndall, P.R. Young,
D.P. Fairlie, J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 48535e48542.
[11] K.J. Chappell, M.J. Stoermer, D.P. Fairlie, P.R. Young, Curr. Med. Chem. 281
(2008) 2771e2784.
[12] B. Walker, J.F. Lynas, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 58 (2001) 596e624.
[13] M.J. Stoermer, K.J. Chappell, S. Liebscher, C.M. Jensen, C.H. Gan, P.K. Gupta,
W.-J. Xu, P.R. Young, D.P. Fairlie, J. Med. Chem 51 (2008) 5714e5721.
[14] G.L. Becker, F. Sielaff, M.E. Than, I. Lindberg, S. Routhier, R. Day, Y. Lu,
W. Garten, T. Steinmetzer, J. Med. Chem. 53 (2010) 1067e1075.
[15] D. Gustafsson, R. Bylund, T. Antonsson, I. Nilsson, J.-E. Nyström, U. Eriksson,
U. Bredberg, A.-C. Teger-Nilsson, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3 (2004) 649e659.
[16] J. Wagner, J. Kallen, C. Ehrhardt, J.-P. Evenou, D. Wagner, J. Med. Chem. 41
(1998) 3664e3674.
concentrations (10, 20, 40, 60, 100, 250 and 500
mM) and the
reaction components shaken for 5 s. The rate of substrate hydrolysis
was monitored at 37 ꢁC by measuring the increase in fluorescence
(lex355 nm and lem460 nm) every 45 s for 1 h on a SpectraMax
Gemini XS plate reader (USA). The Lineweaver-Burk plot was
generated by plotting the reciprocal of hydrolysis rate (1/V) against
the reciprocal of substrate concentration (1/S) at various inhibitor
concentrations. The Ki for inhibitor 2 was derived by non-linear
[17] A.S. Verdini, P. Lucietto, G. Fossati, C. Giordani, Tetrahedron Lett. 33 (1992)
6541e6542.
[18] G. Robin, K. Chappell, M.J. Stoermer, S.-H. Hu, P.R. Young, D.P. Fairlie,
J.L. Martin, J. Mol. Biol. 385 (2009) 1568e1577.