Organic Letters
Letter
a
Table 1. Hydrosilane Screening
Scheme 2. Substrate Scope I: Screening of Various
a
Neopentylic Secondary Alcohols
b
c
c
conv
ee of 1a ee of 3a
entry
hydrosilane 2
(%)
time
(%)
(%)
s
1
2
3
4
5
nBu3SiH (2a)
Me2PhSiH (2b)
MePh2SiH (2c)
Ph3SiH (2d)
nr
52
d
62
62
20 d
6 d
24 h
24 h
6 d
51
48
4.6
17
92
10
55
1.4
11
ArMe2SiH (2e)
a
Unless otherwise noted, reactions were performed on a 0.2 mmol
b
scale and monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Conversion was
determined by HPLC analysis and calculated according to conversion
= eeunreacted alcohol/(eesilyl ether + eeunreacted alcohol). Enantiomeric excesses
c
a
were determined by HPLC analysis on chiral stationary phases (after
cleavage of the silyl ether). Decomposition during purification. Ar =
See caption of Table 1 for details.
d
3,5-Me2C6H3. nr = no reaction.
with an s value of 11, reaching 41% conversion after 10 days
The success with spirocyclic 10a prompted us to investigate
a subset of benzannulated congeners (10b−d, Scheme 3).
Three different ring sizes were probed, and six-membered 10c
and seven-membered 10d converted into the corresponding
silyl ethers 11ce and 11de with superb selectivity factors of 72
and 67, respectively.15 However, 10d was far less reactive than
10c (days vs hours). The silylation of five-membered 10b
furnished a complex reaction mixture. The only difference
between 10c and 8 (see Scheme 2) is the rigid indan-2,2-diyl
unit instead of two flexible benzyl substituents yet their
reaction outcomes are markedly different: s = 72 (12 h) vs s =
11 (6 days). The cyclic alcohol structure was in fact not
needed for an efficient KR with the indane backbone installed.
Compound 4c, a benzannulated version of rather poor
substrate 4a (see Scheme 2), underwent the KR with high
efficacy (s = 66 vs s = 10). The absolute configuration of (R)-
4c was assigned by X-ray diffraction and is in agreement with
the asymmetric induction of the CuCl/NaOtBu/(R,R)-Ph-
BPE catalyst system in the KR of other alcohols.15 With that
important structural feature, even an ethyl (as in 4d) and a
phenyl (as in 4e) group were now compatible; the s values
decreased significantly but were still decent in comparison with
previous results (cf. 3a and 3b as well as ref 5a). The
functional-group tolerance is generally excellent for this copper
catalysis,5,8,9 and we examined a few substrates derived from 4c
with an electronically and sterically modified aryl group (4f−n,
Scheme 3). Their KR yielded consistently high selectivity
factors, and the reaction time was always 20 h. Substrate 4i
with an o-methoxy group was an exception, requiring more
than one month to reach 37% conversion; the s value of 171
was very high though. No such influence was seen for 4n with
an o,o-dichloro-substituted aryl ring. Importantly, the aryl
substituent in 4 can be replaced by an ester group as in 12 (s =
27; gray box, Scheme 3). A larger ring size as in 4o was also
possible (s = 18); 4o is a benzannulated version of 4b (s = 19;
Scheme 2).
and the silyl ether 3ab and the slow-reacting enantiomer of 1a
were isolated in 51% ee and 48% ee, respectively (entry 2).
With s = 4.6, the efficiency was modest. Both MePh2SiH (2c)
and Ph3SiH (2d) did react within 24 h, but 1a/3ac
decomposed (entry 3) and 1a/3ad formed with hardly any
resolution (entry 4). In one of our early studies on catalyst-
controlled Si−O coupling,14 we had screened a broad range of
aryl-substituted hydrosilanes of types ArMe2SiH and
Ar2MeSiH. A 3,5-xylyl group as Ar had given particularly
good results, and we therefore tested ArMe2SiH (2e) with Ar =
3,5-Me2C6H3 in our model reaction. While the reaction was
again slow, the selectivity factor greatly improved (s = 11);
unreacted 1a was isolated with 92% ee along with the silyl
ether 3ae with 55% ee (entry 5).
We continued with this setup (see Table 1, entry 5) and
tested several structural motifs (Scheme 2). Ethyl instead of
methyl at the carbinol carbon atom brought about a dramatic
decrease of the reaction rate (weeks vs days), and the
selectivity factor collapsed9 (11 for 1a/3ae vs 2.7 for 1b/3be;
top). Further structural changes to methyl-substituted 1a led to
4a and 4b. Both were more reactive than 1a (hours vs days),
and the KR was better for 4b/5be and in the same range for
4a/5ae (top). To investigate the effect of more rigidity, we
subjected three representative cyclohexanol derivatives to the
standard procedure (bottom).3c,5a Two of these highly
hindered cyclic alcohols, 6 and 8, required days for full
conversion, and the enantioselection was again comparable to
that achieved with acyclic 1a and 4a,b. Spirocyclic 10a (gray
box) stood out both in terms of reactivity (hours) and
efficiency (s = 31). (R)-10a was one of the alcohols prepared
in high enantiomeric excess by asymmetric transfer hydro-
genation by Wills and co-workers,11b and the absolute
configurations of (R)-10a and (S)-11ae were assigned on
that basis. For completion, we inspected the KR of a strictly
aliphatic alcohol; 1-(adamantan-1-yl)ethan-1-ol reacted slowly
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX