G. Papageorgiou et al. / Tetrahedron 67 (2011) 5228e5234
5233
J¼5.5 Hz, 2H), 4.26 (quintet, J¼5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.22 (s, 2H), 4.00
(t, J¼8.4 Hz, 2H), 3.58e3.61 (m, 2H), 3.33e3.56 (m, 2H), 3.04 (t,
J¼8.4 Hz, 2H). Anal. Calcd for C13H16N4O4: C, 53.42; H, 5.52; N,19.16.
Found: C, 53.69; H, 5.61; N, 18.80.
(Dowex 50, Naþ form); 1H NMR (600 MHz, D2O, acetone ref.)
d
7.85
(d, J¼9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J¼9.0 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (quintet, J¼4.7 Hz, 1H),
4.37 (s, 2H), 4.25 (t, J¼7.8 Hz, 2H), 4.09e4.17 (m, 4H), 3.23 (t,
J¼7.9 Hz, 2H); LRMS (ESI): calcd for (C13H13N5O12P2þ3H)ꢁ 496.0,
found: 495.9. The remainder of the solution was lyophilised to
a pale yellow solid and used in the next step.
4.6. 1-(2-Azidoacetyl)-4-[1,3-bis(di-tert-butoxyphosphoryl-
oxy)propan-2-yloxy]indoline (21)
4.8. 1-(2-Aminoacetyl)-4-[1,3-bis(dihydroxyphosphoryloxy)
propan-2-yloxy]-7-nitroindoline (8)
A solution of 20 (0.58 g, 2 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (60 mL) was
treated under nitrogen with pyridinium trifluoroacetate (1.16 g,
6 mmol) and di-tert-butyl N,N-diethylphosphoramidite (93% pu-
rity; 1.61 g, 6 mmol) and the mixture was stirred under nitrogen at
rt for 20 min. The solution was cooled to 0 ꢃC and treated dropwise
with a solution of m-chloroperbenzoic acid (77% peracid; 2.69 g,
12 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (60 mL). The solution was stirred at 4 ꢃC for
45 min, diluted with CH2Cl2 and washed successively with 10% aq
Na2S2O5, saturated aq NaHCO3 and brine, dried and evaporated.
Flash chromatography (EtOAc) gave 21 (1.19 g, 88%) as white crys-
A solution of 22 (191 mmol) in water (3 mL) was diluted with
DMF (27 mL) and treated with tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hy-
drochloride (TCEP) (383 mg, 1.34 mmol) and the mixture was stir-
red at rt under nitrogen for 28 h. The solution was concentrated
under reduced pressure and the residue was diluted with water
(50 mL) and washed with EtOAc (3ꢀ40 mL). Analysis by reverse-
phase HPLC [mobile phase 25 mM Na phosphate, pH 6.0eMeCN
(25:1), tR 1.8 min], and by anion-exchange HPLC [mobile phase
100 mM Na phosphate, pH 6eMeCN (5:1), 1.5 mL/min, tR 5.2 min]
confirmed complete reduction of the azide. The solution was then
adjusted to pH 6.0 with 1 M aq NaOH and quantified by UVevis
tals, mp 78e80 ꢃC (Et2Oehexanes); 1H NMR (600 MHz)
d 7.87 (d,
J¼8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (t, J¼8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J¼8.2 Hz, 1H), 4.70
(quintet, J¼4.9 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (d, J¼5.2 Hz, 2H), 4.17 (d, J¼5.2 Hz, 2H),
3.98 (t, J¼8.4 Hz, 2H), 3.97 (s, 2H), 3.18 (t, J¼8.4 Hz, 2H), 1.47 (s,
18H), 1.45 (s, 18H). Anal. Calcd for C29H50N4O10P2: C, 51.47; H, 7.45;
N, 8.28. Found: C, 51.87; H, 7.591; N, 8.18.
spectroscopy (51 mL, 3.7 mM, 189 mmol). The solution was diluted
with water (250 mL) to conductivity 5.3 mS cmꢁ1 and subjected to
anion-exchange chromatography using a linear gradient formed
from 10 and 500 mM NaOAc, pH 6.0 (each 1000 mL). Fractions
containing the product, which eluted at w300 mM NaOAc, were
analysed as above, combined (144 mL) and quantified by UV
4.7. 1-(2-Azidoacetyl)-4-[1,3-bis(dihydroxyphosphoryloxy)
propan-2-yloxy]-7-nitroindoline (22)
spectroscopy (0.678 mM, 98 mmol). The solution was concentrated
To a solution of 21 (237 mg, 0.35 mmol) in dry MeCN (3.5 mL)
were added acetic anhydride (357 mg, 3.5 mmol), sodium nitrate
(59.5 mg, 0.7 mmol) and trichloroacetic acid (457 mg, 2.8 mmol)
and the mixture was stirred under nitrogen at rt for 24 h. TLC
[MeOHeEtOAc (1:19)] confirmed that all starting material was
consumed. The reaction mixture was diluted with 200 mM NaOAc,
pH 6.0 (70 mL), the pH was raised from 4.8 to 5.5 with 1 M aq NaOH
and the solution was washed with Et2O (3ꢀ50 mL). Analysis of the
aqueous phase by reverse-phase HPLC [mobile phase 25 mM Na
phosphate, pH 6.0eMeCN (25:1), tR 5.8 min], and by anion-
exchange HPLC [mobile phase 100 mM Na phosphate, pH
6.0eMeCN (5:1), tR 5.2 min], confirmed that all starting material
was nitrated but partial deprotection of phosphate esters took
place. The solution was loaded onto the preparative HPLC column,
which was pre-equilibrated with 200 mM NaOAc, pH 6.0, and
subsequently eluted with the same buffer for further 1.5 h. The
column was then washed with water and the compound began to
elute after about 1 h, when the conductivity of the eluate had
lowered to that of water. The fractions containing the compound
were combined, concentrated to about 25 mL and lyophilised. The
pale yellow residue was dissolved in TFA (15 mL) and stirred at rt
for 1 h. The solvent was evaporated, the residue was dissolved in
25 mM triethylammonium phosphate, pH 6.0 (75 mL) and the pH
was raised from 2.6 to 6.0 with 1 M aq NaOH. HPLC analysis as
above confirmed full deprotection of the phosphate esters. The
solution was loaded onto the preparative HPLC column, which was
pre-equilibrated with 25 mM triethylammonium phosphate, pH
6.0, and subsequently eluted with the same buffer for further 1 h.
The column was then washed with water and the compound began
to elute after about 50 min, when the conductivity of the eluate had
lowered to that of water. Fractions containing the compound were
analysed by reverse-phase HPLC [mobile phase 100 mM Na phos-
phate, pH 6.0eMeCN (25:1), tR 3.6 min], and by anion-exchange
HPLC [mobile phase 100 mM Na phosphate, pH 6.0eMeCN (5:1),
tR 5.8 min], combined and concentrated. The residue was taken
to about 4 mL, diluted with water to 8 mL, treated with 2 M
Ba(OAc)2 (2 mL) and EtOH (4 mL) and allowed to stand at 4 ꢃC
overnight. The mixture was centrifuged and the supernatant was
analysed by UVevis spectroscopy (9% of original concentration, i.e.,
91% precipitation). The precipitate was washed with watereEtOH
(1:1) (5ꢀ15 mL) by resuspension and subsequent centrifugation
after each wash cycle. The final precipitate was dissolved in water
(15 mL) and mixed with Dowex 50 (Naþ form; 4 g) for 2 h. The resin
was filtered off, washed with water (20 mL) and the combined fil-
trates were adjusted from pH 8.4 to 6.8 with 1 M aq HCl. The filtrate
was passed through a 0.2
residue was dissolved in water (4 mL) and quantified by UVevis
spectroscopy to give 8 (22.3 mM, 89
mol, 47%) as the Naþ salt
mm membrane filter, lyophilised and the
m
[containing a small amount of tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine oxide
in approximately 4:1 ratio]; 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O, acetone ref.)
d
8.00 and 7.86 (2ꢀd, J¼9.2 Hz, 1H, rotamers), 7.90 and 7.20 (2ꢀd,
J¼9.2 Hz, 1H, rotamers), 4.89 and 4.55 (2ꢀquintet, J¼5.0 Hz, 1H,
rotamers), 4.27 and 4.21 (2ꢀt, J¼7.9 Hz, 2H, rotamers), 4.14 (s, 2H),
4.00e4.07 (m, 4H), 3.47 and 3.27 (2ꢀt, J¼7.9 Hz, 2H, rotamers);
LRMS (ESI): calcd for (C13H16N3O12P2þ2H)ꢁ 470.0, found: 470.0.
Complete separation from tris(carboxyethyl)phosphine oxide was
not achieved in the purification, as shown by signals in the 1H NMR
spectrum at
d 2.38e2.43 [m, P(O)(CH2CH2CO2)3], 2.09e2.14 [m,
P(O)(CH2CH2CO2)3], with intensities corresponding to w20 mol %
of the concentration of 8.
4.9. Quantitative photolysis and product analysis for (8)
Separate solutions of 8 (0.47 mM in 25 mM Na phosphate, pH 7.0
containing 5 mM dithiothreitol) were irradiated for varying times
(20 or 25 s) in 1 mm path length cells (Rayonet Photochemical
Reactor). The solutions were analysed by anion-exchange HPLC
(mobile phase as in Section 4.8) and the extent of photolysis of each
solution was determined by comparison of peak heights with those
of non-irradiated controls. Aliquots of the photolysed solutions
were also subjected to quantitative amino acid analysis. Measured
glycine concentrations were 68e69% of the expected values from
the extent of photolysis and were not affected by the concentration
up in water (35.5 mL), passed through a 0.2
quantified by UVevis spectroscopy to give pure 22 (5.47 mM,
194
mol, 55%). An aliquot (0.6 mL) was exchanged to the Naþ salt
mm membrane and
m