ACS Catalysis
Letter
increased the product yield.12,13 As observed in our previous
report, triazolium- and imidazolium-type NHCs did not afford
any products (data not shown).6a,b The control experiments
revealed that both NHC and the Cs2CO3 base were essential
for this reaction (data not shown).
a
Table 2. Substrate Scope
In the radical NHC catalysis, the bulky N-substituents would
not only secure the persistent nature14 of the Breslow
intermediate-derived radical but also prohibit the possible
side reactions between nucleophilic species generated in situ
from NHC and the ester moiety in 2. However, the sterically
demanding N-substituents such as 2,6-disopropylphenyl (N1)
or diphenylmethyl (N4) groups in close proximity to the
carbene center were not suitable in the case of aliphatic
aldehyde substrates (see Table 1C). These N-substituents
would lead to unsuccessful radical−radical coupling, because
the Breslow intermediate-derived radical from aliphatic
aldehyde would be more three-dimensionally congested than
that from aromatic aldehyde, because of the sp3 nature of α-
carbon. As a result, N-neopentyl-substituted N10, in which
steric hindrance is introduced at some distance from the
carbene center, rather than within a proximity, might be
effective both for the radical−radical coupling and the
suppression of side reactions.
This protocol under the N10 catalyst system was useful to
construct the sterically hindered dialkyl ketones bearing
secondary or tertiary alkyl substituents (Table 2). In the top
portion of Table 2, various redox active esters were examined
using the reaction of cyclohexanecarboxyaldehyde (1b). The
secondary benzylic carboxylic acid-derived redox active esters
possessing methyl (3bc), ethyl (3be), and allyl (3bf) groups
were suitable substrates. Tertiary benzylic groups containing
cyclic (3bg) and acyclic (3bd and 3bh) scaffolds could be
coupled with the acyl group efficiently. Unactivated tertiary
alkyl group was engaged in this decarboxylative alkylation
(3bb). Amide (3bi) and benzyl ether (3bj) substituents did
not inhibit the reaction. Overall, the reactivity seemed to be
correlated with the stability of the generated alkyl radical (3bc
vs 3bd and 3bg vs 3bb, 3bi). α-Amino- and α-alkoxy-
substituted ketones, which are known as synthetically useful
intermediates, were easily prepared by this reaction (3bk−
3bn). The relatively low yield of 3bm and 3bn might be due to
the decomposition of the protecting groups such as acetyl or
silyl substituents by basic reaction conditions. It is noteworthy
that pharmaceutical drugs such as Loxoprofen and Gemfibrozil
were acylated, respectively (3bo and 3bp).
A broad range of primary and secondary aliphatic aldehydes
were efficiently coupled with the redox active ester 2d to
produce the dialkyl ketones (Table 2, bottom). Citronellal was
directly alkylated (3cd). Unprotected alcohol and thioether
groups were compatible (3dd and 3ed). Acyclic and cyclic
secondary alkyl aldehydes were also good substrates (3fd−
3hd). The alkene moiety that sometimes poisons transition-
metal catalysis did not inhibit the reaction (3fd). The
cyclopropyl ketone could be synthesized from cyclopropane-
carboxaldehyde via this organocatalytic reaction (3gf).
Heterocyclic ketone containing a piperidine scaffold was
prepared (3hd). Several combinations of aliphatic aldehydes
and tertiary redox active esters were also shown (3ab, 3gk, and
3hj). The aldehydes derived from natural products such as
lithocolic acid and cholic acid could participate in this
decarboxylative alkylation reaction (3ii and 3jd). Unfortu-
nately, the reaction with the tertiary aliphatic aldehyde resulted
in the recovery of substrates (data not shown). It would be due
a
Reaction was performed with 1 (0.3 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), N10
(0.02 mmol), and Cs2CO3 (0.04 mmol) in DMSO (0.4 mL) at 60 °C
for 4 h. bDiastereomeric ratio is 55:45 determined by 1H NMR
analysis.
to the slow formation of Breslow intermediate caused by the
steric bulkiness.
To gain the more information on catalytic activity of N10,
several reactions were conducted. First, N10 was subjected to
the decarboxylative coupling with benzaldehyde 1i to exhibit
the comparable reactivity as the previous optimal catalyst N1
(Scheme 2A).6a Thus, the newly designed N10 was identified
as a versatile NHC catalyst for the decarboxylative radical
coupling of both aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes.
To understand the reaction mechanism, competition
experiments were conducted (Schemes 2B and 2C). When
the reaction of the redox ester 2d with the same amounts of 1i
8526
ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 8524−8529