10.1002/chem.201905279
Chemistry - A European Journal
Communications
a-GalACer-4 (30 µM in DMSO) in the dark-adapted state and at 370 nm and
440 nm; e) reversible isomerization of a-GalACer-1 (30 µM in DMSO) over
multiple switching cycles; f) reversible isomerization of a-GalACer-4 (30 µM in
DMSO) over multiple switching cycles; g) thermal relaxation of a-GalACer-1 (30
µM in DMSO at 37 °C); h) thermal relaxation of a-GalACer-1 (30 µM in DMSO
at 37 °C).
Figure 4. a) IFN-γ secretion by human NKT cell line when stimulated by 10-100
ng/mL of indicated glycolipids was measured after 16 h of culture. Illumination
with 370 nm leads to an 6-fold increase in IFN-γ production for 10 ng/mL a-
GalACer-4. b) IL-4 secretion by human NKT cell line when stimulated by 10-100
ng/mL of indicated glycolipids was measured after 16 h of culture. Illumination
with 370 nm leads to a 4-fold increase in IL-4 production for 10 ng/mL a-
GalACer-4. Results are expressed as relative activities as mean of triplicate
assays. Representative data from one of two experiments are shown.
Following their synthesis, the photophysical and thermal
properties of our photolipids were characterized (Figure 3).[9] As
depicted for a-GalACer-4 and a-GalACer-1, the dark state or
trans-a-GalACer changes its configuration upon illumination with
370 nm light to its cis-isomer. The compound can be switched
over multiple cycles and is configurationally stable when left in the
dark for an extended period of time.
The structural difference between a-GalACer-1 and a-GalACer-4
lies in the relative position of the azobenzene unit in the acyl side
chain. Our results suggest that the spacer chain length of a-
GalACer-1 was too short to interact with the aromatic residues in
the CD1d hydrophobic groove, whereas a-GalACer-4 appears to
be a better fit.[10] When comparing cytokine production of a-
GalACer-4 at 10 ng/mL concentration we observe that IFN-γ
production is increased 6-fold whereas IL-4 production is only
increased 4-fold.
With several photoswitchable galactosyl ceramide derivatives in
hand, we evaluated their ability to activate human Vα24+ NKT
cells. To this end, we measured IFN-γ production relative to KRN-
7000 in ELISA assays in a light-dependent way (Figure 4a).
Among the derivatives tested, a-GalACer-1 and a-GalACer-4
emerged as our lead compounds. At a galactosyl ceramide
concentration of 10 ng/mL both derivatives gave lower cytokine
production than KRN-7000 itself. Upon illumination with UV light,
the IFN-γ secretion of cells treated with a-GalACer-1 increased,
albeit only to a low level. However, when cells were treated with
a-GalACer-4, illumination with 370 nm resulted in a significant
increase in IFN-γ production.
In summary we have introduced a highly potent photoswitchable
immunomodulator, a-GalACer-4. It elicits very low cytokine
production in its trans configuration but triggers significant
cytokine secretion following irradiation. a-GalACer-4 is therefore
a valuable tool to investigate spatiotemporal activation of cytokine
production. Upon UV irradiation, the production of both TH1 and
TH2-type-cytokines is robustly enhanced. Our future attempts will
focus on the design and synthesis of a next generation
photochromic galactosyl ceramides, which might allow for
selective control of TH1- over TH2-response.
Next, we investigated the effect of a-GalACer-1 and a-GalACer-
4 on IL-4 production (Figure 4b). Treatment of a human NKT cell
line that expresses an invariant Vα24 T-cell receptor (TCR) with
a-GalACer-1 in the dark led to a slightly lower IL-4 secretion
compared with exposure to KRN-7000. Illumination with UV light
only led to a small increase in cytokine production. At low a-
GalACer-4 concentration, cytokine production was similar to the
one observed with KRN-7000. Upon irradiation with 370 nm light,
IL-4 production was significantly increased, surpassing the effect
of the reference compound.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the Deutsche Telekom Foundation (Ph.D.
fellowship to N.H.), the LMUMentoring program (fellowship N.H.),
the German Academic Scholarship Foundation (Ph.D. Fellowship
to N.A.V), the New York University (MacCracken Fellowship to B.
E. H.) as well as the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB
749 and CIPSM) for generous funding. This work was partially
supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant AI070258 (to
M.T.).
Keywords: cancer immunotherapy • photopharmacology •
azobenzenes • galactosyl ceramides • natural killer T cells
[1]
[2]
T. Natori, Y. Koezuka, T. Higa, Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 5591-5592.
A. Banchet-Cadeddu, E. Henon, M. Dauchez, J.-H. Renault, F.
Monneaux, A. Haudrechy, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 3080-3104.
a) M. Kronenberg, Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 23, 877-900; b) B. J. Wolf,
J. E. Choi, M. A. Exley, Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 384.
[3]
[4]
a) M. J. Smyth, E. Cretney, M. H. Kershaw, Y. Hayakawa, Immunol. Rev.
2004, 202, 275-293; b) S. Lee, K. Margolin, Cancers 2011, 3, 3856-
3893.
[5]
a) R. J. Mancini, L. Stutts, T. Moore, A. P. Esser-Kahn, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 5962–5965; b) K. A. Ryu, B. McGonnigal, T. Moore, T.
Kargupta, R. J. Mancini, A. P. Esser-Kahn, Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8074.
B. Parasara, P. V. Chang, Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 1450-1453.
[6]
[7]
For recent reviews on photopharmacology see: a) K. Hüll, J. Morstein, D.
Trauner, Chem Rev. 2018, 118, 10710-10747; b) M. M. Lerch, M. J.
Hansen, G. M. van Dam, W. Szymanski, B. L. Feringa Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2016, 55, 10978–10999; c) J. Broichhagen, J. A. Frank, D. Trauner,
Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1947-1960; d) W. A. Velema, W. Szymanski,
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.