the direct vinylation of benzofuran by this method is
always at the 2-position, since the electrophilic palladation
of benzofuran is more favored at the 2-position.
We conceived that, in combination with Pd-catalyzed
cyclization of alkynes, such a type of CdC bond forming
reaction may be applied to the synthesis of 3-vinylindoles
and 3-vinylbenzofurans (Scheme 1, c þ d).
As demonstrated in Scheme 2, the key step involved in
this approach is the migratory insertion of the Pd carbene
B to form intermediate C, which is followed by β-hydride
elimination. Notably, in this transformation, CꢀC single
bond formation (the cyclization) and CdC double bond
formation (carbene coupling) are achieved in a single
catalytic cycle.
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Representation of the Pd-Catalyzed
Synthesis of 3-Vinylindoles
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 3-Vinylindoles and 3-Vinylbenzofurans
Based on Pd Carbene Reaction
Pd-catalyzed cyclization represents another powerful
approach for the construction of an indole structure,
among which the alkyne-based Pd-catalyzed synthesis
of indoles has been extensively investigated.7 In 2000,
Yamamoto and co-workers reported an efficient synthesis
of 3-vinylindoles by Pd-catalyzed intramolecular cycliza-
tion of alkynylimines (Scheme 1, b).8 Since the imine
moiety can be generated in situ from the correspond-
ing amine and aldehyde, this reaction has also been ex-
tended to a three-component coupling for 3-vinylindole
synthesis.
Although significant progress has been made for the
synthesis of 3-vinylindoles, some drawbacks exist for the
existing methods. For example, the alkene substrates used
in the coupling reactions are often limited to those contain-
ing electron-withdrawing substituents, and the 3-vinylin-
dole products obtained are usually limited to those bearing
a disubstituted alkene moiety. Moreover, little attention
has been paid to the synthesis of 3-vinylbenzofurans.
Therefore, it is desirable to further develop novel methods
for the synthesis of 3-vinylindoles and 3-vinylbenzofurans.
In recent years, we and several other groups have
reported a series of Pd-catalyzed CdC bond forming reac-
tions based on a Pd carbene migratory insertion process.9
At the outset of this investigation, we employed the
N-tosylhydrazone 2 as the precursor for in situ generation
of a nonstabilized diazo compound (BamfordꢀStevens
reaction).10 We examined the reaction of N-acetyl-N-(3-
phenylprop-2-ynyl)-2-iodoaniline 1a with N-tosylhydrazone
2 in the presence of the Pd(PPh3)4 catalyst and Cs2CO3 in
toluene at 80 °C. The reaction worked well to afford the
desired 3-vinylindole 3a in good yield (eq 1). To further
simplify the reaction, we attempted a one-pot reaction
starting directly from benzadehyde 4a. Thus, the benzade-
hyde 4a was heated with TsNHNH2 at 60 °C in toluene for
10 min, and then N-acetyl-N-(3-phenylprop-2-ynyl)-2-
iodoaniline 1a, Pd(PPh3)4 catalyst, and Cs2CO3 were added
and heating was continued for another 3 h. To our delight,
the one-pot reaction afforded the desired 3-vinylindole 3a
in slightly improved yield (eq 2).
The one-pot reaction was then applied to a series of aro-
matic aldehydes/ketones 4aꢀk and 2-iodoanilines 1aꢀe
(Scheme 3). The reaction is not markedly affected by the
substituents on the aromatic aldehydes. The aromatic
aldehydes including those bearing an electron-donating
group (4b,c) and electron-withdrawing group (4dꢀf),
as well as those sterically hindered aldehydes (4h) and
heteroaromatic aldehyde (4i), all gave the corresponding
3-vinylindoles in moderate to good yields. However,
ketones (4j, k) gave relatively lower yields, which may be
attributed to the lower reactivity of the corresponding
N-tosylhydrazones than these derived from the corre-
sponding aldehydes. The other reaction component, the
2-iodoanilines 1aꢀe, were then examined. It turned out
(7) For selected reviews, see: (a) Alonso, F.; Beletskaya, I. P.; Yus, M.
Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3079–3159. (b) Zeni, G.; Larock, R. C. Chem. Rev.
2006, 106, 4644–4680. (c) Patil, N. T.; Yamamoto, Y. Chem. Rev. 2008,
108, 3395–3442. (d) Vlaar, T.; Ruijter, E.; Orru, R. V. A. Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2011, 353, 809–841. (e) Abbiati, G.; Marinelli, F.; Rossi, E.;
Arcadi, A. Isr. J. Chem. 2013, 53, DOI: 10.1002/ijch.201300040. For
related approaches, see: (f) Le Strat, F.; Maddaluno, J. Org. Lett. 2002,
ꢀ
4, 2791–2793. (g) Fressigne, C.; Girard, A.; Durandetti, M.; Maddaluno,
J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 721–729. (h) Durandetti, M.; Hardou, L.;
ꢀ
Clement, M.; Maddaluno, J. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4753–4755. (i)
Durandetti, M.; Hardou, L.; Lhermet, R.; Rouen, M.; Maddaluno, J.
Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 12773–12783. (j) Arcadi, A.; Blesi, F.; Cacchi, S.;
Fabrizi, G.; Goggiamani, A.; Marinelli, F. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 4490–
4498.
(8) Takeda, A.; Kamijo, S.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 5662–5663.
(9) For reviews, see: (a) Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011,
ꢀ
1015–1026. (b) Barluenga, J.; Valdes, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
7486–7500. (c) Shao, Z.; Zhang, H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 560–572.
(d) Xiao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 236–247. (e)
Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Top. Curr. Chem. 2012, 327, 239–269.
(10) Bamford, W. R.; Stevens, T. S. J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 4735–4740.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
B