such as high fluorescence quantum yield, sharp absorption
and fluorescence emission spectra, and high photo- and
chemical stability. Therefore, BODIPY dyes have played
increasingly important roles in many fields involving mole-
cular probes,8 photodynamic therapy,9 laser dyes,10 and
solar cells.11 However, most BODIPY dyes have a very
small Stokes shift (400ꢀ600 cmꢀ1, in most cases) because
they have a rigid molecular structure with minimal differ-
ences between the ground- and excited-state structures.12
Such a small Stokes shift makes it difficult for optical filters
to cut the excitation light, making it difficult to read the
fluorescence signal over the noise in a bioassay.12a A small
Stokes shift also induces the reabsorption of its own fluor-
escence, which causes a reduction in fluorescence intensity.
Also, most BODIPY dyes have high planarity, which in-
creases intermolecular interactions, causing concentration
quenching in the solid state.13 Thus, they hardly exhibit
fluorescence in the solid state.14 Recently, we reported on a
pyridometheneꢀBF2 complex that is an analog of a BOD-
IPY dye.3d Although this complex exhibited fluorescence
in the solid state, the Stokes shift was very small in solution
(250ꢀ400 cmꢀ1). In this paper, we report the synthesis and
fluorescence properties of a novel pyrazineꢀboron com-
plex that exhibits solid-state fluorescence and has a large
Stokes shift (3690ꢀ4900 cmꢀ1).
of diketone with triphenylborane, which gives the BPh2
complex.15 The structures of 4 and 7 were confirmed by
X-ray crystallography (Figures 1, S1).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of PyrazineꢀBoron Complexes
The THF solution of 2,5-dimethylpyrazine and ethyl
benzoate was refluxed in the presence of sodium hydride
to yield a tautomeric mixture of iminoketone 1a and
iminoenol 1b (Scheme S1, Table S1). The reaction of the
tautomeric mixture 1 with trifluoroborane gave pyrazine-
containing BF2 complex 4 (Scheme 1). Furthermore, 1 was
easily reacted with triphenylborane in THF at rt to give
BPh2 complex 7. Although this result is different from the
reaction of pyrromethene with triphenylborane, which
does not yield the BPh2 complex, it is consistent with that
(8) (a) Shao, J.; Guo, H.; Ji, S.; Zhao, J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26,
3012. (b) Tachikawa, T.; Wang, N.; Yamashita, S.; Cui, S.-C.; Majima, T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8593. (c) Kobayashi, H.; Ogawa, M.;
Alford, R.; Choyke, P. L.; Urano, Y. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2620. (d)
Gonc-alves, M. S. T. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 190.
Figure 1. ORTEP view of 7. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted
for clarity.
(9) (a) Lovell, J. F.; Liu, T. W. B.; Chen, J.; Zheng, G. Chem. Rev. 2010,
110, 2839. (b) Ozlem, S.; Akkaya, E. U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 48.
The absorption and fluorescence spectra of 1, 4, and 7 in
dichloromethane are shown in Figure 2. Compound 4
exhibited a maximum absorption wavelength (λmax) at 403
nm, which is more bathochromic than 1 (364 nm). Although
1 exhibited no fluorescence, 4 showed blue fluorescence at
480 nm. The λmax of 7 (427 nm) was red-shifted compared to
that of 4 (402 nm), and the molar absorption coefficient (ε)
of 7 (14000) was lower than that of 4 (24000). The max-
imum fluorescence wavelength (Fmax) of 7 (520 nm) also
exhibited a red shift compared to that of 4 (480 nm). As a
result, 7 exhibited yellow-green fluorescence. The absolute
fluorescence quantum yields (Φf) of 4 and 7 in dichloro-
methane were 0.57 and 0.70, respectively. Interestingly, 4
(3980 cmꢀ1) and 7 (4190 cmꢀ1) exhibited a larger Stokes
shift than a fluorescent boron complex such as a BODIPY
dye (400ꢀ600 cmꢀ1) and a pyridometheneꢀBF2 complex
(250ꢀ400 cmꢀ1). This large Stokes shift may be due to
the flexible structure of the pyrazineꢀboron complex
bearing a β-iminoketone ligand at the excited state.12
ꢁ
(10) (a) Gomez-Duran, C. F. A.; Garcıa-Moreno, I.; Costela, A.;
Martin, V.; Sastre, R.; Banuelos, J.; Lopez Arbeloa, F.; Lopez Arbeloa,
ꢁ
~
ꢁ
ꢁ
~
I.; Pena-Cabrera, E. Chem. Commun. 2010, 5103. (b) Ortiz, M. J.;
Garcia-Moreno, I.; Agarrabeitia, A. R.; Duran-Sampedro, G.; Costela,
ꢁ
~
ꢁ
A.; Sastre, R.; Lopez Arbeloa, F.; Banuelos Prieto, J.; Lopez Arbeloa, I.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 7804.
(11) (a) Ertan-Ela, S.; Yilmaz, M. D.; Icli, B.; Dede, Y.; Icli, S.;
Akkaya, E. U. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3299. (b) Rousseau, T.; Cravino, A.;
Bura, T.; Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R.; Roncali, J. Chem. Commun. 2009, 1673.
(12) (a) Ito, F.; Nagai, T.; Ono, Y.; Yamaguchi, K.; Furuta, H.;
Nagamura, T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 435, 283. (b) Qin, W.; Rohand,
T.; Baruah, M.; Stefan, A.; Van der Auweraer, M.; Dehaen, W.; Boens,
N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 420, 562.
(13) (a) Matsui, M.; Ikeda, R.; Kubota, Y.; Funabiki, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2009, 50, 5047. (b) Park, S.-Y.; Ebihara, M.; Kubota, Y.; Funabiki,
K.; Matsui, M. Dyes Pigm. 2009, 82, 258. (c) Park, S.-Y.; Kubota, Y.;
Funabiki, K.; Shiro, M.; Matsui, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1131.
(d) Yoshida, K.; Ooyama, Y.; Miyazaki, H.; Watanabe, S. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2002, 700. (e) Ooyama, Y.; Nabeshima, S.;
Mamura, T.; Ooyama, H. E.; Yoshida, K. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 7954.
(14) (a) Kubota, Y.; Uehara, J.; Funabiki, K.; Ebihara, M.; Matsui,
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 6195. (b) Ozdemir, T.; Atilgan, S.; Kutuk,
I.; Yildirim, L. T.; Tulek, A.; Bayindir, M.; Akkaya, E. U. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 2105.
(15) Kersten, L.; Roesner, S.; Hilt, G. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4920.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 24, 2011
6545