6698
S. C. Wu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 6693–6698
6. 11b-HSD1 microsomes isolated from HEK 293 cells over-expressing human
11b-HSD1 were incubated with the substrate cortisone and cofactor NADPH at
room temperature. The reactions were terminated with the addition of a
nonspecific 11b-HSD1 inhibitor (18b-glycyrrhetinic acid). The product, cortisol
was quantified in an immuno-competition SPA wherein the [3H]-cortisol
bound to anti-rabbit antibody Yttrium silicate SPA beads coated with
polyclonal anti-cortisol antibody was competed by cortisol produced in the
reaction and the reaction mixture was read in a scintillation plate reader
(TopCount). The IC50 value was then determined by amount of cortisol formed
from a cortisol standard curve.
cells. The reason for reduced cellular activity at present is unclear
since pampa and caco-2 permeability studies do not suggest re-
duced potential for permeability (data not shown). This attribute al-
most certainly contributed to the poor response in vivo and may be
an endemic property of this particular chemotype.
In summary, we have discovered a structurally unique series of
hydroxyisoquinolines as novel 11b-HSD1 inhibitors. These com-
pounds in general exhibited good cross species activity (human,
mouse, cynomolgus monkey) along with other desirable develop-
ment attributes such as weak CYP450 inhibition, no PXR activation,
and little ion channel activity. We were able to improve the meta-
bolic stability and aqueous solubility for a number of analogs (e.g.,
13d). The primary challenge for this series of compounds is their
propensity to undergo rapid glucuronidation in liver microsomes
and their weak activity in cellular assays. These issues required fur-
ther investigation and the results will be published in due course.
7.
5
l
L of 300
added to 450
microsomal protein in the reaction buffer (100 mM NaPO4, pH 7.4, 5 mM
MgCl2). Following 5 min pre-incubation at 37 °C, 50 L of 10 mM NADPH was
l
M compound in acetonitrile: DMSO (98.6:1.4 by volume), was
lL of pre-warmed microsomal mixtures, containing 1.1 mg/mL
l
added to the mixtures to initiate metabolic reactions. Reactions were
terminated immediately after NADPH addition (0 min sample) and after
10 min incubation with NADPH (10 min sample), by transferring 150
lL
reaction aliquots into 300 L acetonitrile. Denatured microsomal protein was
l
precipitated by centrifugation. The supernatant was then analyzed using LC–
MS/MS. The percent of parent compound remaining in the reaction mixture
was calculated by comparing LC–MS/MS peak areas from the 10 min samples
to those from the 0 min samples for each compound. The rate of metabolism
was then calculated using the following formula: metabolic rate (nmol/
min mg) = ((1-fract remaining) ꢁ substrate conc. (nmol/mL))/(time inc
(min) ꢁ protein conc. (mg/mL)), where substrate conc. = 3 nmol/mL, prot
conc = 1 mg/mL, and incubation time = 10 min. Values of 0.00 represent no
measurable metabolism over the course of the experiment whereas values of
0.30 represent complete in vitro metabolism.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
8. Vial containing sodium phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.2), test compound
(30 M), human liver microsome (2 mg/mL) and NADPH (2 mM) was incubated
l
References and notes
in a 37 °C water bath for 1 h. Ice cold acetonitrile was added to the incubation
mixture. The mixture was centrifuged and the supernatant was analyzed with
LC/MS/MS. Metabolites were identified based on the observed mass and UV
spectra. Levels of metabolites were estimated based on UV peak area at 320–
330 nm, assuming same extinction coefficient for metabolites and the parent.
9. (a) McKillop, A.; Rao, D. P. Synthesis 1977, 760; (b) Robl, J.A.; Wu, S.C.; Yoon, D.,
WO2008005910, 2008.
10. DIO mice were bled via tail tip in the fed state and dosed orally (7.5 ml/kg) with
vehicle or drug (0.1% Tween 80, 0.5% methocel in water). At 30 min post
dosing, mice were bled via tail tip and dosed orally (7.5 ml/kg) with DHC
10 mg/kg. All animals were bled at 30, 60 and 120 minutes post DHC dosing.
1. (a) Wild, S.; Roglic, G.; Green, A.; Sicree, R.; King, H. Diabetes Care 2004, 27,
1047; (b) Patti, M.-E.; Corvera, S. Endocrine Rev. 2010, 31, 364. and references
cited therein.
2. (a) Tomlinson, J. W.; Stewart, P. M. Nat. Clin. Pract. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 1,
92; (b) Wang, M. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2006, 7, 319; (c) Saiah, E. Curr. Med.
Chem. 2008, 15, 642; (d) Schnackenberg, C. G. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2008, 9,
295; (e) Fotsch, C.; Wang, M. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4851; (f) Stewart, P. M.;
Tomlinson, J. W. Diabetes 2009, 58, 14; (g) Boyle, C. D.; Kowalski, T. J. Expert
Opin. Ther. Pat. 2009, 19, 801; (h) Ge, R.; Huang, Y.; Liang, G.; Li, X. Curr. Med.
Chem. 2010, 17, 412; (i) Tiwari, A. IDrugs 2010, 13, 266. and references cited
therein.
3. (a) Kotelevtsev, Y.; Holmes, M. C.; Burchell, A.; Houston, P. M.; Schmoll, D.;
Jamieson, P.; Best, R.; Brown, R.; Edwards, C. R. W.; Seckl, J. R.; Mullins, J. J. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 14924; (b) Morton, N. M.; Holmes, M. C.; Fievet,
C.; Staels, B.; Tailleux, A.; Mullins, J. J.; Seckl, J. R. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 41293.
4. (a) Yeh, V. S. C.; Kurukulasuriya, R.; Fung, S.; Monzon, K.; Chiou, W.; Wang, J.;
Stolarik, D.; Imade, H.; Shapiro, R.; Knourek-Segel, V.; Bush, E.; Wilcox, D.;
Nguyen, P. T.; Brune, M.; Jacobson, P.; Link, J. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006,
16, 5555; (b) Patel, J. R.; Shuai, Q.; Dinges, J.; Winn, M.; Pliushcher, M.; Fung, S.;
Monzon, K.; Chiou, W.; Wang, J.; Pan, L.; Wagaw, S.; Engstrom, K.; Kerdesky, F.
A.; Longenecker, K.; Judge, R.; Qin, W.; Imade, H. M.; Stolarik, D.; Beno, D. W. A.;
Brune, M.; Chovan, L. E.; Sham, H. L.; Link, J. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17,
750; (c) Julian, L. D.; Wang, Z.; Bostick, T.; Caille, S.; Choi, R.; DeGraffenreid, M.;
Di, Y.; He, X.; Hungate, R. W.; Jaen, J. C.; Liu, J.; Monshouwer, M.; McMinn, D.;
Rew, Y.; Sundon, A.; Sun; Daqing, S.; Tu, H.; Ursu, S.; Walker, N.; Yan, X.; Ye, Q.;
Power, J. P. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 3953; (d) Cheng, H.; Hoffman, J.; Le, P.; Nair,
S. K.; Cripps, S.; Matthews, J.; Smith, C.; Yang, M.; Kupchinsky, S.; Dress, K.;
Edwards, M.; Cole, B.; Walters, E.; Loh, C.; Ermolieff, J.; Fanjul, A.; Bhat, G. B.;
Herrera, J.; Pauly, T.; Hosea, N.; Paderes, G.; Rejto, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2010, 20, 2897.
35 lL of whole blood were collected per time point in microvette tubes coated
with EDTA and kept on ice. Samples were centrifuged at 40 °C for 10 min at
2500 RPM. Plasma corticosterone concentration was measured using EIA. AUC
of corticosterone concentrations were calculated using Graphpad.
11. To a solution of 2
10 L of 200 mM of MgCl2, 40
liver microsome and 2 L of 2.5 mg/mL of alamethicine in water was added
34 L of 30 mM of UDPGA and 66 L of water. The total 200 L solution was
incubated for 0, 5, 15 and 30 min. At each time point, the solution was added
400 L of acetonitrile, which contained 1% of formic acid, to precipitate the
l
L of 1 mM 2–8 AcCN/water solution of the substrate and
l
l
L of 500 mM Tris buffer, 10 L of 20 mg/mL
l
l
l
l
l
l
protein at time. The supernatant was centrifuged and remaining substrate was
determined by LC–MS. T1/2 was determined from the standard curve of the
substrate concentration versus time.
12. A conformational search was first carry out for each compound to locate the
global minimum energy conformation in aqueous phase using the OPLS 2005
force field with mixed-torsional low mode sampling using the Macromodel
program. The RI-MP2 energy was calculated from the minimum-energy
structure using the QChem package version 3.2.
13. The O-methylated analog was prepared by treatment of 2 with MeI and K2CO3.
The N-methylated analog was prepared by the procedure described in
Bassindale, A. R.; Parker, D. J.; Patel, P.; Taylor, P. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 4933.
5. El-Khawaga, A. M.; El-Naggar, G. M.; Hassan, K. M.; El-Dean, A. M. Phosphorus,
Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 1989, 44, 203.
14. PDB Deposition number is 3TFQ.