CyaA Inhibition by Bis-Halogen-ANT Nucleotides
107
Blank values were approximately 0.02% of the total added amount of were calculated and visualized by the program MOLCAD (MOLCAD,
[␣-32P]ATP; substrate turnover was Ͻ3% of the total added
Darmstadt, Germany) contained within SYBYL.
[␣-32P]ATP. Samples collected in scintillation vials were filled up
with 10 ml of double-distilled water and Cerenkov radiation was
Results
measured in
a Tri-Carb 2800TR liquid scintillation analyzer
(PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Waltham, MA). Free
concentrations of divalent cations were calculated with Win-MaxC
therms were analyzed by nonlinear regression using Prism 4.0 software
(GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). Km values were 120 M
(AC1), 100 M (AC2), 70 M (AC5) and were taken from Gille et al.
(2004). The Km value for CyaA was 45 M and was determined in our
previous study (Go¨ttle et al., 2007).
Structure-Activity Relationships of Mono-(M)ANT
Nucleotides for mACs and CyaA. We examined the inhibi-
tory effects of 16 mono-MANT nucleotides on the catalytic ac-
tivity of mammalian ACs 1, 2, and 5 and bacterial CyaA (Table 1).
Nucleotides differed from each other in base (adenine, hypo-
xanthine, and cytosine) and phosphate chain length (mono-
phosphate, diphosphate, or triphosphate). Mono-substituted
compounds (1–16) undergo spontaneous isomerization under
physiological pH between the 2Ј- and 3Ј-O-ribosyl positions
(Suryanarayana et al., 2009). The ANT moiety differed by
hydrogen, chlorine, bromine, and an acetylamino group in the
5-position of the phenyl ring (Fig. 1; R1). Moreover, substitution
at the amino function of the ANT-group led to methyl (MANT)
and propyl (Pr-ANT) derivatives (Fig. 1; R2).
Recombinant ACs 1, 2, and 5 showed different sensitivity
to inhibition by (M)ANT nucleotides (Table 1). In accordance
with previous studies (Gille et al., 2004; Go¨ttle et al., 2009),
AC2 was the AC isoform with the lowest inhibitor sensitivity
because of the exchange of A409P and V1108I in AC1 and
AC5 versus AC2 (Mou et al., 2005). (M)ANT-NTPs with the
purine base hypoxanthine had the highest potency. Specifi-
cally, MANT-ITP is the most potent inhibitor known so far
for AC1 and AC5 with Ki values of 1 to 3 nM (Go¨ttle et al.,
2009). The exchange of adenine with cytosine had only mar-
ginal impact on potency (1 and 3). The halogenated ANT-ATP
derivatives (4 and 6), in comparison with MANT-ATP (1),
showed slightly more potent inhibition of ACs 1 and 5. The
corresponding inosine compounds (5 and 7) exhibited lower
potency than MANT-ITP on a still high level. Substitution of
bromine with chlorine in ANT-ITP yielded 2-fold more potent
inhibition of mACs (7 3 5). Elongation of the alkyl residue
from N-methylated to N-propylated ANT nucleotides lowered
Ki values 3- to 8-fold (1 3 8, 2 3 9). A further decrease in
potency was observed for the acetylated aminoanthraniloyl
nucleotides. The inhibition effect of Ac-NH-ANT-ATP (10)
dropped into the micromolar range, and the corresponding
inosine derivative (11) was 30- to 50-fold less potent than
MANT-ITP (2). It is noteworthy that Ac-NH-ANT-ITP (11)
displayed the highest 4-fold selectivity for AC5 compared
with AC1. Deletion of the ␥-phosphate reduced inhibitor af-
finity 3- to 26-fold (1 3 12, 2 3 13, 6 3 14) and is in
accordance with previous data. Crystallographic studies
showed that the Mn2ϩ ion in the B-site coordinates with the
␥-phosphate of MANT-NTPs (Mou et al., 2005, 2006). The lack
Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Experiments were conducted by
using a quartz UV ultra-microcuvette from Hellma (Mu¨llheim, Ger-
many) (light path length, 3 mm; center, 15 mm; total volume, 70 l;
type 105.251-QS). Measurements were carried out in a Cary Eclipse
fluorescence spectrometer (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA) at a constant
temperature of 25°C (scan rate, 120 nm/min; averaging time, 0.5 s;
photomultiplier voltage, 700 V; data interval, 1 nm; slit width, 5 nm)
(Go¨ttle et al., 2007). Initially, the cuvette contained 64 l of 75 mM
HEPES/NaOH buffer, pH 7.4, 100 M CaCl2, 100 mM KCl, and 5
mM MnCl2. Next, nucleotide, CyaA, and CaM were added succes-
sively. The cuvette content was mixed after each addition to end up
with a total volume of 70 l. (M)ANT nucleotides were excited at 350
nm, and steady-state emission spectra were recorded from 380 to 550
nm at low speed. The final concentrations of CyaA and CaM were 2.4
M each. Basal fluorescence in the presence of buffer alone was
subtracted. (M)ANT nucleotides were displaced from CyaA by PMEApp at
concentrations of 100 nM to 3 M. For an estimation of the respon-
siveness of the MANT group to a hydrophobic environment, fluores-
cence of mono- and bis-(M)ANT nucleotides was determined with
dimethyl sulfoxide ranging from 0 to 100% (v/v). Fluorescence re-
cordings were analyzed with the spectrum package of Cary Eclipse
software (Varian).
Modeling of Nucleotide Binding Mode to mAC and CyaA.
Docking studies were performed with the molecular modeling pack-
age SYBYL 7.3 (Tripos, St. Louis, MO) on an Octane workstation
(SGI, Mountain View, CA). Initial computer models of bis-Br-ANT-
ITP in complex with mAC and bis-Br-ANT-ATP in complex with
CyaA were generated from the PDB crystal structures 3g82 (3Ј-
MANT-ITP bound to mAC) and 1zot (PMEApp bound to CyaA) (Guo
et al., 2005), respectively. In the case of CyaA, the starting confor-
mation of bis-Br-ANT-ATP was derived from complexes of 3Ј-MANT-
ATP and TNP-ATP with mAC (PDB structures 2gvz and 2gvd, re-
spectively) (Mou et al., 2005, 2006). An initial docking position
resulted from superposition of roughly optimized conformations with
PMEApp, allowing the modification of rotatable bonds, and from
consideration of the fluorescence data (interaction of the 3Ј-MANT
group with Phe306). In both cases, the ribosyl conformations were
adjusted to avoid clashes of the second Br-ANT group with the cores
of mAC and CyA, respectively. Hydrogens were added and charges
were assigned (proteins and water molecules, AMBER_FF99; li-
gands, Gasteiger-Hueckel). The ions (Mn2ϩ or Mg2ϩ) received formal of this phosphate group destabilizes the diphosphate chain in
charges of 2. Each complex was refined in a stepwise approach. First,
ϳ50 minimization cycles with fixed ligand using the AMBER_FF99
force field (Cornell et al., 1995) (steepest descent method); second,
ϳ100 minimization cycles of the ligand and the surrounding (dis-
tance up to 6 Å) protein residues (Tripos force field) (Clark et al.,
1989), and third, ϳ100 minimization cycles with fixed ligand
(AMBER_FF99 force field, Powell conjugate gradient) were performed.
The second and third steps were repeated with a larger number of
cycles until a root mean square force of 0.01 kcal/mol ϫ ÅϪ1 was
approached. To avoid overestimation of electrostatic interactions, a
distance-dependent dielectric constant of 4 was applied. Molecular
surfaces and lipophilic potentials (protein variant with the new
its binding site. The deletion of the -phosphate group of the
MANT-NMP reduced inhibitor potency 120-fold (13 3 15). Ex-
change of the MANT group with an ANT group had only little
effect on inhibitor affinity (15 3 16).
Generally, the inhibitor potency of mono-(M)ANT-NTPs at
CyaA was lower than at mACs or maximally reached the
affinity range of AC2. MANT-ATP (1) was less potent than
MANT-ITP (2), but at all other combinations of adenosine
and inosine derivatives the corresponding ANT-ATPs exhib-
ited higher inhibition potency (4 3 5, 6 3 7, 8 3 9, 10 3 11).
MANT-CTP (3) is the most potent MANT nucleotide inhibitor
Crippen parameter table) (Heiden et al., 1993; Ghose et al., 1998) of edema factor AC toxin from Bacillus anthracis with a Ki