664
T. H. Graham et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 658–665
Table 6
pyrrolidine, common to the previous PrCP inhibitors 1 and 2, was
Mouse PK data for selected PrCP inhibitorsa
replaced by a series of substituted benzylamines. Many of the com-
pounds demonstrated PrCP inhibition in whole serum, decreased
recognition by P-gp efflux transporters and were cell permeable.
Compound (S)-6e exhibited significant brain exposures during
in vivo studies; however, the dosing of (S)-6e at 30 mpk caused
non-mechanism-based weight loss and 10 mpk dosing did not
achieve statistically significant mechanism-based weight loss.
The in vivo results suggested that very high levels of PrCP inhibi-
tion may be required for efficacy in the eDIO model. Therefore,
compounds with improved oral pharmacokinetics and enhanced
in vivo efficacy will be required to fully understand the role of PrCP
in body weight homeostasis. The results from studies directed to-
wards this goal will be reported in due course.
Compound
Cl
Vd
(L/kg)
T
(h)
%F
AUCNpo
(M h kg/mg)
½
(mL/min/kg)
3h
5d
5e
6c
(S)-6e
6f
105
78
85
185
217
389
5.6
24
21
27
31
59
0.7
4.4
3.6
2.3
1.7
1.8
1.3
40
<0.01
0.19
ndb
<0.01
0.04
0.04
ndb
<1
22
35
a
Formulations: 1 mg/mL ethanol–PEG–water (20:40:40), IV dose: 1 mg/kg
(n = 2), PO dose: 2 mg/kg (n = 3), blood concentration was determined by LC/MS/MS
following protein precipitation with acetonitrile.
b
Not determined.
References and notes
(S)-6e (10 mpk)
Vehicle
1.0
0.5
1. (a) Skidgel, R. A.; Erdös, E. G. Immun. Rev. 1998, 161, 129; (b) Kumamoto, K.;
Stewart, T. A.; Johnson, A. R.; Erdös, E. G. J. Clin. Invest. 1981, 67, 210; (c) Yang,
H. Y. T.; Erdös, E. G.; Chiang, T. S. Nature 1968, 218, 1224.
2. Miller, J. J.; Changaris, D. G.; Levy, R. S. Life Sci. 1991, 48, 1529.
3. (a) Odya, C. E.; Marinkovic, D. V.; Hammon, K. J.; Stewart, T. A.; Erdös, E. G. J.
Biol. Chem. 1978, 253, 5927; (b) Yang, H. Y. T.; Erdös, E. G.; Chiang, T. S.; Jenssen,
T. A.; Rodgers, J. G. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1970, 19, 1201.
Day
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0.0
4. (a) Shariat-Madar, Z.; Mahdi, F.; Schmaier, A. H. Blood 2004, 103, 4554; (b)
Shariat-Madar, Z.; Mahdi, F.; Schmaier, A. H. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 17962; (c)
Moreira, C. R.; Schmaier, A. H.; Mahdi, F.; da Motta, G.; Nader, H. B.; Shariat-
Madar, Z. FEBS Lett. 2002, 523, 167.
-0.5
5. (a) Diano, S. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2011, 32, 70; (b) Wallingford, N.; Perroud,
B.; Gao, Q.; Coppola, A.; Gyengesi, E.; Liu, Z.-W.; Gao, X.-B.; Diament, A.; Haus,
K. A.; Shariat-Madar, Z.; Mahdi, F.; Wardlaw, S. L.; Schmaier, A. H.; Warden, C.
H.; Diano, S. J. Clin. Invest. 2009, 119, 2291.
-1.0
6. (a) Adams, G. N.; LaRusch, G. A.; Stavrou, E.; Zhou, Y.; Nieman, M. T.; Jacobs, G.
H.; Cui, Y.; Lu, Y.; Jain, M. K.; Mahdi, F.; Shariat-Madar, Z.; Okada, Y.; D’Alecy, L.
G.; Schmaier, A. H. Blood 2011, 117, 3929; (b) Mallela, J.; Yang, J.; Shariat-
Madar, Z. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009, 41, 477; (c) Wang, L.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, Y.;
Zhou, H.; Jiang, S.; Niu, T.; Wei, L.-J.; Xu, X.; Xu, X.; Wang, X. Am. J. Obstet.
Gynecol. 2006, 195, 162.
7. (a) Chajkowski, S. M.; Mallela, J.; Watson, D. E.; Wang, J.; McCurdy, C. R.;
Rimoldi, J. M.; Shariat-Madar, Z. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 405, 338;
(b) Ngo, M.-L.; Mahdi, F.; Kolte, D.; Shariat-Madar, Z. J. Inflamm. 2009, 6, 3.
8. Duan, L.; Motchoulski, N.; Danzer, B.; Davidovich, I.; Shariat-Madar, Z.;
Levenson, V. V. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 2864.
9. (a) Shariat-Madar, B.; Kolte, D.; Verlangieri, A.; Shariat-Madar, Z. Diabetes
Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2010, 3, 67; (b) Diament, A. L.; Warden, C. H. Int. J. Obes.
2004, 28, 199.
10. Horvath, T.; Diano, S.; Gao, Q.; Warden, C. H. International Patent Application
WO2005115446A2.
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
11. (a) McCarthy, J. J.; Meyer, J.; Moliterno, D. J.; Newby, L. K.; Rogers, W. J.; Topol,
E. J. Hum. Genet. 2003, 114, 87; (b) Chissoe, S. U.S. Patent Application
20080108080A1.
Vehicle
(S)-6e (10 mpk)
Figure 2. (a) The effect of (S)-6e on the body weight of the wild-type eDIO mouse
12. (a) Zhao, X.; Southwick, K.; Cardasis, H. L.; Du, Y.; Lassman, M. E.; Xie, D.; El-
Sherbeini, M.; Geissler, W. M.; Pryor, K. D.; Verras, A.; Garcia-Calvo, M.; Shen,
D.-M.; Yates, N. A.; Pinto, S.; Hendrickson, R. C. Proteomics 2010, 10, 2882; (b)
Soisson, S. M.; Patel, S. B.; Abeywickrema, P. D.; Byrne, N. J.; Diehl, R. E.; Hall, D.
L.; Ford, R. E.; Reid, J. C.; Rickert, K. W.; Shipman, J. M.; Sharma, S.; Lumb, K. J.
BMC Struct. Biol. 2010, 10, 16; (c) Abeywickrema, P. D.; Patel, S. B.; Byrne, N. J.;
Diehl, R. E.; Hall, D. L.; Ford, R. E.; Rickert, K. W.; Reid, J. C.; Shipman, J. M.;
Geissler, W. M.; Pryor, K. D.; SinhaRoy, R.; Soisson, S. M.; Lumb, K. J.; Sharma, S.
Acta Crystallogr., Sect. F Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 2010, 66, 702.
13. Zhou, C.; Garcia-Calvo, M.; Pinto, S.; Lombardo, M.; Feng, Z.; Bender, K.; Pryor,
K. D.; Bhatt, U. R.; Chabin, R. M.; Geissler, W. M.; Shen, Z.; Tong, X.; Zhang, Z.;
Wong, K. K.; Sinha Roy, R.; Chapman, K. T.; Yang, L.; Xiong, Y. J. Med. Chem.
2010, 53, 7251.
14. Shen, H. C.; Ding, F.-X.; Zhou, C. Y.; Xiong, Y. S.; Verras, A.; Chabin, R. M.; Xu, S.
Y.; Tong, X. C.; Xie, D.; Lassman, M. E.; Bhatt, U. R.; Garcia-Calvo, M.; Geissler,
W.; Shen, Z.; Chen, D. L.; SinhaRoy, R.; Hale, J. J.; Tata, J. R.; Pinto, S.; Shen, D.-
M.; Colletti, S. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 1299.
15. (a) Kim, I.-W.; Booth-Genthe, C.; Ambudkar, S. V. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2008, 8,
193; (b) Raub, T. J. Mol. Pharm. 2006, 3, 3; (c) Lin, J. H. Drugs Today 2004, 40, 5;
(d) Lin, J. H.; Yamazaki, M. Drug Metab. Rev. 2003, 35, 417; (e) Didziapetris, R.;
Japertas, P.; Avdeef, A.; Petrauskas, A. J. Drug Target. 2003, 11, 391; (f) Seelig, A.;
Landwojtowicz, E. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2000, 12, 31.
during a 7-day study; (b) Plasma PrCP inhibition at the termination of the study.
30 mpk dosing, both the KO and the WT cohorts lost weight and
this result indicated non-mechanism-based weight loss. In addi-
tion, significant skin-related adverse events (AEs) occurred with
compound precipitation at the infusion pump injection site. Termi-
nal plasma concentrations were 0.22 0.14 and 0.25 0.08 lM for
the WT and KO cohorts, respectively. The WT PrCP inhibition was
calculated to be 85% based on the heat-inactivated plasma shifted
Ki.24 The 10 mpk cohorts failed to demonstrate statistically signif-
icant weight loss relative to the vehicle dose and there were negli-
gible AEs at the injection site. Terminal plasma concentrations
were 0.27 0.17 and 0.16 0.06 lM for the WT and KO cohorts,
respectively. The WT PrCP inhibition was calculated to be 87%
based on a heat-inactivated plasma shifted Ki.24 The results dem-
onstrated that the required level of inhibition cannot simply be
achieved with higher doses. Increasing the dose above 10 mpk
did not afford dose proportional in vivo inhibition of PrCP and
led to skin-related AEs and precipitation of the compound at the
injection site.25
16. Pardridge, W. M. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 1995, 15, 5.
17. (a) Zanda, M. New J. Chem. 2004, 28, 1401; (b) Mikami, K.; Itoh, Y.; Yamanaka,
M. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1.
18. Patani, G. A.; LaVoie, E. J. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 3147.
19. The mouse AngIII assay involved treating the whole mouse plasma with
protease inhibitors to suppress the conversion of AngIII to Ang (2–7) by non-
PrCP proteases. The PrCP inhibitor was then added to study the rate of
conversion of AngIII to Ang (2–7) as compared to a vehicle treated control.
In conclusion, potent brain-penetrant inhibitors of PrCP
have been described. The dichlorobenzimidazole-substituted