Fig. 2 Phase diagrams for CHA4 alkali salt mixtures.
Fig. 3 7Li and 11B NMR spectra of LiBF4 (0.2 mol dm23) dissolved in
CMeA6, in the isotropic and nematic state. Spectra are shown to an absolute
scale.
stacking of two molecules sharing one cation or by the
segregation of the ionic motives in columnar mesostructures.6
In these new systems, the observation of nematic phases over a
large compositional range (x) can be explained by the three
alkyl chains which prevent ionic interactions between cations,
counter anions and molecules. The size of the crown cavity is
larger than Li+ but fits Na+ ions well, while larger cations such
as Cs+ do not fit11 and attempts to obtain mesogenic phases with
this ion failed.
Further studies are in progress to understand the orientation
inside these systems and to correlate these values with ion-
crown complexation and ion-pairing.
1
Notes and references
NMR of quadrupolar nuclei (i.e. with nuclear spin I > 2) is a
very sensitive method for probing the local anisotropy inside
oriented media.15 In isotropic solvents the averaged electric
field gradient (efg) is zero and each non-equivalent nucleus
gives a single line in the fast reorientation regime. In contrast,
when ions are dissolved in anisotropic media, host–guest
interactions may lead to the partial orientation of the dissolved
entities and to a polarization of the electronic cloud, leading to
a partially ordered efg of the cation which leads to 2I equally
spaced lines. The existence of a quadrupolar splitting indicates
that ions are effectively distorted and oriented inside anisotropic
media. The measured quadrupolar splitting, Dn(Qion), represents
1 B. Bahadur, in Liquid Crystal—Applications and Uses, World Scientific
Publishing Co, Pte. Ltd., Singapore, vol. 1–3, 1990–1992.
2 M. Lee, N.-K. Oh and H. K. Lee, J. Mater. Chem., 1996, 6, 1079.
3 V. Percec, D. Tomazos, J. Heck, H. Blackwell and G. Ungar, J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1994, 31.
4 V. Rayssac, P. Judeinstein, J. P. Bayle, D. Kuwahara, H. Ogata and S.
Miyajima, Liq. Cryst., 1998, 25, 427.
5 M. Kölbel, T. Beyersdorff, I. Sletvold, C. Tschierske, J. Kain and S.
Diele, Angew. Chem., 1999, 38, 1077.
6 G. Johannson, V. Percec, G. Ungar and D. Abramic, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. I, 1994, 447.
7 V. Percec, G. Johannson, G. Ungar and J. Zhou, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1996, 118, 9855.
8 G. X. He, F. Wada, K. Kikukawa, S. Shinkai and T. Matsuda, J. Org.
Chem., 1990, 55, 541.
the so-called ‘apparent ionic order’.16
3
7Li and 11B (I = ) NMR spectra obtained for CRA6 (R = Me)
2
mixed with 0.2 equivalents of LiBF4 [nematic range
136.6–152.4 °C (heating cycle) and down to 85 °C (cooling
step)] are shown in Fig. 3. At 433 K, single lines are observed,
thus showing the isotropy of the medium. Narrow linewidths
were measured for both ions (ca. 20 Hz) which indicates their
high mobility inside the fluid system. In the nematic state (400
K), triplets (intensities 3 4 3) were observed for both nuclei,
indicating that both cations and anions experience the aniso-
tropy of the media. The quadrupolar splittings, Dn(QLi) and DnQ(B)
are ten times larger than those measured in swollen oriented
DNA fibers17 or lyotropic liquid crystals.18 An enlargement of
the 11B central signal also indicates a quintet structure, which
corresponds to the dipolar splitting T1B–F = 66 Hz. An ‘apparent
ionic order’ S = 5 3 1023 was calculated for the anion inside
these structures. This low value may be attributed to anisotropic
tumbling and distortion of the anion from its initial Td
symmetry.18
9 J. W. Goodby, G. H. Mehl, I. M. Saez, R. P. Tuffin, G. Mackenzie, R.
Auzély-Velty, T. Benvegnu and D. Plusquellec, Chem. Commun., 1998,
2057.
10 Qing Jiang, L. Z. Li, M. G. Xie and J. W. Ran, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst.,
Sect. A, 1997, 302, 323.
11 J. M. Lehn, Supramolecular Chemistry, Verlag, Weinheim, 1995.
12 C. Tschierske, J. Mater. Chem., 1998, 8, 1485.
13 P. Berdagué, M. Munier, P. Judeinstein, J. P. Bayle, C. S. Nagaraja and
K. V. Ramanathan, Liq. Cryst., 1999, 26, 211.
14 H. T. Nguyen, C. Destrade and J. Malthête, Adv. Mater., 1997, 9,
375.
15 E. T. Samulski, Polymer, 1985, 26, 177.
16 V. Dessolle, J. P. Bayle, J. Courtieu, J. Rault and P. Judeinstein, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 1999, 103, 2653.
17 J. Schultz, L. Nordenskiöld and A. Rupprecht, Biopolymers, 1992, 32,
1631.
18 F. Fujiwara, L. W. Reeves and A. S. Tracey, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1974,
96, 5250.
1292
Chem. Commun., 2000, 1291–1292