Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
and oxidation, furnishes the target alkyne in 90% ee and 47%
overall yield (three steps; eq 7).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
Support has been provided by the National Institutes of Health
(National Institute of General Medical Sciences, grant R01-
GM62871) and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
(research fellowship for A.J.O.). We thank Dr. Wataru
Muramatsu for a preliminary investigation.
REFERENCES
■
(1) (a) For leading references, see: Zultanski, S. L.; Fu, G. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15362−15364. Owston, N. A.; Fu, G. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11908−11909. (b) For an initial study, see:
Fischer, C.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4594−4595. (c) For
multi-gram reactions, see: Lou, S.; Fu, G. C. Org. Synth. 2010, 87,
317−329. Lou, S.; Fu, G. C. Org. Synth. 2010, 87, 330−338.
(2) For work by others, see: Caeiro, J.; Sestelo, J. P.; Sarandeses, L. A.
Chem.Eur. J. 2008, 14, 741−746.
Although propargylic carbonates are not suitable cross-
coupling partners (<2% ee and 5% yield) using our earlier
procedure for Negishi reactions of propargylic bromides,10 our
new method is fairly versatile, effective not only for propargylic
carbonates (Table 2), but, without modification, also for
propargylic bromides and chlorides (eqs 8 and 9).
(3) For reviews and leading references, see: (a) Rudolph, A.; Lautens,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2656−2670. (b) Glorius, F. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8347−8349.
(4) For a recent review with leading references, see: Rosen, B. M.;
Quasdorf, K. W.; Wilson, D. A.; Zhang, N.; Resmerita, A.-M.; Garg, N.
K.; Percec, V. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1346−1416.
(5) Enantioselective coupling reactions of secondary allylic electro-
philes: (a) Indolese, A. F.; Consiglio, G. Organometallics 1994, 13,
2230−2234 and references therein. (b) Nomura, N.; RajanBabu, T. V.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1713−1716. (c) Gomez-Bengoa, E.;
Heron, N. M.; Didiuk, M. T.; Luchaco, C. A.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7649−7650. (d) Nagel, U.; Nedden, H. G. Inorg.
Chim. Acta 1998, 269, 34−42. (e) Chen, H.; Deng, M.-Z. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2000, 603, 189−193. (f) Chung, K.-G.; Miyake, Y.; Uemura, S.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 15−18. Chung, K.-G.; Miyake, Y.;
Uemura, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 2725−2729. (g) Novak,
A.; Fryatt, R.; Woodward, S. Comptes Rendus Chimie 2007, 10, 206−
212.
(6) For suggestions of radical intermediates in nickel-catalyzed cross-
coupling reactions of unactivated alkyl electrophiles, see the following.
(a) Suzuki: Zhou, J.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1340−
1341. (b) Hiyama: Powell, D. A.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 7788−7789. (c) Reference 1a. We expect that the pathway for
oxidative addition will depend on a variety of factors, including the
ligand, the leaving group, and the nature of the electrophile (e.g.,
unactivated vs. activated).
(7) For mechanistic proposals for Ni/terpyridine-catalyzed Negishi
reactions of unactivated alkyl electrophiles, see: (a) Jones, G. D.;
Martin, J. L.; McFarland, C.; Allen, O. R.; Hall, R. E.; Haley, A. D.;
Brandon, R. J.; Konovalova, T.; Desrochers, P. J.; Pulay, P.; Vicic, D. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13175−13183. (b) Lin, X.; Phillips, D. L.
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3680−3688.
(8) For a review and leading references, see: Mancuso, J. In Name
Reactions for Homologations; Li, J. J., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons:
Hoboken, NJ, 2009; Part 1, pp 614−632.
(9) For leading references to the chemistry of alkynes, see: (a)
Science of Synthesis; Thomas, E. J., Ed.; Thieme: Stuttgart, 2008; Vol.
43. (b) Acetylene Chemistry; Diederich, F., Stang, P. J., Tykwinski, R.
R., Eds.; Wiley−VCH: New York, 2005.
(10) Smith, S. W.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12645−
12647.
(11) Notes: (a) Under our standard reaction conditions: essentially
no cross-coupling product (<2%) is formed in the absence of
NiCl2(PCy3)2, and very little (∼5%) is generated in the absence of L*;
a propargylic carbonate that includes a terminal alkyne is not a suitable
substrate; an attempt to couple a hindered electrophile (alkyl = i-Pr)
led to the formation of an allene; the corresponding propargylic iodide
cross-couples in lower yield (<30%); there is no kinetic resolution of
the propargylic carbonate during the course of a coupling reaction.
(b) The cross-coupling illustrated in entry 2 of Table 2 proceeds in
91% ee and 48% yield (with 20% unreacted electrophile) in the
presence of 5% NiCl2(PCy3)2 and 6.5% L*. (c) In a preliminary study
In summary, with respect to nickel-catalyzed enantioselective
cross-couplings of alkyl electrophiles that bear oxygen leaving
groups, only reactions of a small set of allylic alcohol derivatives
with Grignard reagents had previously been reported to
proceed in good ee and yield. We have established that a
diverse array of racemic propargylic carbonates are suitable
coupling partners in nickel/pybox-catalyzed asymmetric Negishi
reactions. The method is compatible with a range of functional
groups and employs commercially available catalyst compo-
nents. The development of a versatile nickel-catalyzed
enantioselective cross-coupling process for electrophiles that
bear a leaving group other than a halide adds a significant new
dimension to the scope of these reactions. Further inves-
tigations into the use of non-halide leaving groups, as well as
studies to elucidate the mechanism of this transformation, are
underway.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
S
* Supporting Information
Experimental procedures and compound characterization data.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Author
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
2968
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja300031w | J. Am. Chem.Soc. 2012, 134, 2966−2969