value of this methodology lies in its high simplicity and
powerful capability to form two aromatic rings and four
new chemical bonds in a one-pot fashion, with the possibility
of simultaneous introduction of diversity inputs in almost
every position of the resulting scaffold. Consequently, it is
thus definitely superior to already reported lengthy multistep
routes18 for the preparation of the imidazo[1,5-a]quinoxaline
core, often necessitating exotic and not easily available starting
materials, which make a diversity-oriented approach difficult.
It is interesting to note that the Boc deprotection/cyclization
strategy has therefore been extended to one more MCR, in
addition to the “evergreen” Ugi19 and the more recently
investigated Passerini20 and Petasis21 condensations.
Table 3. Development of the Two-Step One-Pot Processa
entry
solvent
time
temperature (°C)
yield (%)
Having this optimized methodology in hand, we next
explored the scope of the process and evaluated our
modified V-3CR with different ortho-N-Boc-phenylene-
diamines, phenylglyoxaldehydes, and TOSMICs, our goal
being to both determine route generality and to prepare a
small collection of compounds 9. (Table 4)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
100
100
100
100
100
200
140
150
160
180
200
180
58
52
64
67
52
55
a Note: Conditions are referred to step B (TOSMIC and base
addition). Imine formation was always conducted with MW (50, 100 °C).
Table 4. Scope of the Van Leusen 3-CR DeprotectionꢀCyclization
One-Pot Route
Noteworthy, this two-step process afforded 9a in a nice
65% overall yield by means of a simple and operationally
friendly strategy requiring only one chromatography step.
Nevertheless, further improvement was possible. Indeed,
when step B of the Van Leusen condensation was conducted
at 120 °C (Table 1, entry 8), 13% of cyclized compound 9a
was isolated. Intrigued by this finding, we were prompted to
attempt harsher conditions in step B to promote the MCR
and direct conversion of imidazole 8a into final product 9a
in one-pot. After careful screening (Table 3), we found
microwave induced heating at 180 °C (Table 3, entry 4)
represented a viable way to directly afford 9a without
isolation of its monocyclic precursor. As a matter of fact,
lower temperatures proved to be sufficient to drive Boc
deprotection and cyclization completely, although slightly
poorer yields were obtained. Conversely, further increments
up to 200 °C (Table 3, entry 5) or longer reaction time
(Table 3, entry 6) led to more side product formation.
To our delight, this resulted in the development of an
efficient one-pot two-step entry into a medicinally relevant
family of imidazo[1,5-a]quinoxalines. Such a moiety is in fact
the key motif of anticancer14 and antiarthritis15 agents, show-
ing remarkable activity in the inhibition of tyrosin-kinases16
and phosphodiesterases.17 From a synthetic point of view, the
compound
R1
R2
R3
yield (%)
9a
9b
9c
9d
9e
9f
H
H
H
H
H
H
67
61
52
53
58
66
74
33
40
39
71
66
59
65
70
55
4-CF3
4-OMe
3-NO2
H
H
H
H
5-OMe
4-Br
H
H
H
9g
9h
9i
H
H
Ph
Et
Et
Et
Ph
Ph
Ph
H
H
5-F
4-OMe
3,4,5-tri-OMe
4-OMe
4-CF3
3,4,5-tri-OMe
4-F
9j
4,5-di-Me
5-OMe
5-OMe
4-Br
9k
9l
9m
9n
9o
9p
9q
9r
4-Br
4-Br-Ph
4-Br-Ph
4-Br-Ph
H
4,5-di-Me
4,5-di-Me
H
3,4,5-tri-OMe
3-NO2
2-OMe
2-F
(14) Moarbess, G.; Deleuze-Masquefa, C.; Bonnard, V.; Gayraud-
Paniagua, S.; Vidal, J-R.; Bressolle, F.; Pinguet, F.; Bonnet, P-A. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 6601.
5-OMe
4-Br-Ph
13
(15) Kim, K-H.; Maderna, A.; Schnute, M. E.; Hegen, M.; Mohan, S.;
Miyashiro, J.; Lin, L.; Li, E.; Keegan, S.; Lussier, J.; Wrocklage, C.;
Nickerson-Nutter, C. L.; Wittwer, A. J.; Soutter, H.; Caspers, N.;
Han, S.; Kurumbail, R.; Dunussi-Joannopoulos, K.; Douhan, J., III.;
Wissner, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 6258.
(16) (a) Chen, P.; Norris, D.; Iwanovicz, E. J.; Spergel, S. H.; Lin, J.;
Gu, H. H.; Shen, Z.; Witjak, J.;Lin, T-A.; Pang, S.;De Fex, H. F.;Pitt, S.;
Shen, D. R.; Doweyko, A. M.; Bassolino, D. A.; Roberge, J. Y.; Poss, M.
A; Chen, B-C.; Schieven, G. L.; Barrish, J. C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2002, 12, 1361. (b) Barrish, J. C.; Spergel, S. H. WO 99/10341, 1999.
(17) Hofgen, N.; Stange, H.; Langen, B.; Egerland, U.; Schindler, R.
U. S. Patent 0143391, 2009.
(18) (a) Chen, B-C.; Zhao, R.; Bednarz, M. S; Wang, B.; Sundeen,
J. E.; Barrish, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 977. (b) Sundaram, G. S. M.;
Singh, B.; Venkatesh, C.; Ila, H.; Junjappa, H. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
5020. (c) Sharma, S.; Kundu, B. J. Comb. Chem. 2009, 11, 720.
(19) (a) Dietrich, J.; Kaiser, C.; Meurice, N.; Hulme, C. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2010, 51, 3951. (b) Xu, Z.; Dietrich, J.; Shaw, A. Y.; Hulme, C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 4566.
(20) Shaw, A. Y.; Medda, F.; Hulme, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 1313.
(21) Ayaz, M.; Dietrich, J.; Hulme, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 4821.
1356
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 5, 2012