422
N. Montazeri, S. Mahjoob / Chinese Chemical Letters 23 (2012) 419–422
Table 3
Comparison of efficiency of various catalysts in the synthesis of 2,4,6-triphenylpyridine 4a.
Catalyst
Conditions
Time (h)
Yield (%)
Ref.
Cyanuric chloride
Solvent-free; 130 8C
Solvent-free; 120 8C
Solvent-free; 120 8C
Solvent-free; 120 8C
Solvent-free; 120 8C
4
4
3
6
2
70
80
88
56
89
[6]
HClO4–SiO2
[7]
Brønsted-acidic ionic liquid
[8]
I2
[9]
PFPAT
This work
the present methodology offers suitable conditions with respect to reaction times and yields. Some of the results are
summarized in Table 3.
The reusability of the catalyst is one of the most important benefits and makes them useful for commercial
applications, thus the recovery and reusability of PFPAT was investigated. For this purpose, the same model reaction
was again studied under optimized conditions. After the completion of the reaction, the catalyst was easily recovered
according to the procedure mentioned in experimental section and reused for a similar reaction. The catalyst could be
used at least three times with only slight reduction in the catalytic activity (89% for 1st use; 87% for 2nd use; 84% for
3rd use).
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have developed a new method for the one-pot three-component synthesis of 2,4,6-triarylpyridines
from aromatic aldehydes, acetophenones, and ammonium acetate using PFPAT as an efficient organocatalyst in good
to excellent yields. Simple experimental procedure, nontoxic, noncorrosive, metal-free, inexpensive solid acid
catalyst, recyclability of the catalyst with no loss in its activity, short reaction times, eco-friendly, great selectivity, and
solvent-free reaction conditions have made this approach distinctly superior over to many other protocols reported
earlier.
Acknowledgment
This research has been supported by the Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon Branch.
References
[1] (a) A. Domling, I. Ugi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39 (2000) 3168;
(b) X.Y. Zhang, X.Y. Li, X.S. Fan, et al. Chin. Chem. Lett. 19 (2008) 153;
(c) E. Rajanarendar, M.N. Reddy, K.R. Murthy, Chin. Chem. Lett. 21 (2010) 927.
[2] N. Farhanullah, A. Agarwal, V. Gael, et al. J. Org. Chem. 68 (2003) 2983.
[3] (a) G. Matolcsy, Pesticide Chemistry, Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam, Oxford, 1988, p. 427;
(b) L. Tian, J. Song, J. Wang, et al. Chin. Chem. Lett. 20 (2009) 288.
[4] (a) F. Krohnke, W. Zecher, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (1962) 626;
(b) F. Krohnke, Synthesis (1976) 1.
[5] (a) M. Adib, H. Tahermansouri, S.A. Koloogani, et al. Tetrahedron Lett. 47 (2006) 5957;
(b) G.W.V. Cave, C.L. Raston, Chem. Commun. (2000) 2199.
[6] B. Maleki, D. Azarifar, H. Veisi, et al. Chin. Chem. Lett. 21 (2010) 1346.
[7] L. Nagarapu, A.R. Peddiraju, S. Apuri, Catal. Commun. 8 (2007) 1973.
[8] A. Davoodnia, M. Bakavoli, R. Moloudi, et al. Monatsh. Chem. 141 (2010) 867.
[9] Y.M. Ren, C. Cai, Monatsh. Chem. 140 (2009) 49.
[10] T. Funatomi, K. Wakasugi, T. Misaki, et al. Green Chem. 8 (2006) 1022.
[11] A. Lida, J. Osada, R. Nagase, et al. Org. Lett. 9 (2007) 1859.
[12] N. Ryohei, O. Jun, T. Hiroaki, et al. Adv. Synth. Catal. 352 (2010) 1128.
[13] N. Montazeri, S. Khaksar, A. Nazari, et al. J. Fluorine Chem. 132 (2011) 450.
[14] M.A.P. Martins, C.P. Frizzo, D.N. Moreila, et al. Chem. Rev. 109 (2009) 4140.