V. N. Devegowda et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 1630–1633
1633
16. Lee, J. G.; Choi, K. I.; Koh, H. Y.; Kim, Y.; Kang, Y.; Cho, Y. S. Synthesis 2001, 1, 81.
17. Bartulewicz, D.; Anchim, T.; Dabrowska, M.; Nowaczek, K. M. Il Farmaco 2004,
59, 211.
18. Fischer, D. S.; Allan, G. M.; Bubert, C.; Vicker, N.; Smith, A.; Tutill, H. J.; Purohit,
A.; Wood, L.; Packham, G.; Mahon, M. F.; Reed, M. J.; Potter, B. V. L. J. Med. Chem.
2005, 48, 5749.
the five compounds with 6–11% (89–94% of inhibition) and 7–26%
(74–93% of inhibition) of remaining activity at 10 M concentra-
tion, respectively. The compounds, however, showed negligible
activity on EGFR and PDGFR kinases indicating moderate selectiv-
l
a
ity towards these kinases. Thus, it could be found that 6-N-arylcar-
boxamidopyrazolo[4,3-d]pyrimidin-7-one derivatives selectively
inhibit serine/threonine kinases rather than tyrosine kinases.
In summary, an extensive library of 6-N-arylcarboxamidopyraz-
olo[4,3-d]pyrimidin-7-one derivatives was assembled and exam-
ined for trends with respect to anticancer potency, selectivity
and SARs. The in vitro anticancer activity tests indicated that com-
pound 12b was the most cytotoxic agent against both colon and
prostate cancer cell lines. While 13a was highly selective towards
colon (HT-29) cancer cell line, a few other compounds such as 10o,
10p and 10q exhibited significant anticancer activity against HT-
29. The alicyclic and aliphatic groups on R2 were found to be vital
for potency. Further studies on the structure modification and anti-
cancer activity evaluation are in progress.
19. Hale, K. J.; Lazarides, L. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1832.
20. El-Abadelah, M. M.; Sabri, S. S.; Khanfar, M. A.; Yasin, H. A. J. Heterocycl. Chem.
2002, 39, 1055.
21. Spectral data of selected 6-N-arylcarboxamidopyrazolo[4,3-d]pyrimidin-7-one
derivatives: Compound 10o: White Solid (362 mg, 75.5%); mp 226.0; 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): d 9.62 (s, 1H, NH), 8.33 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 8.04–7.99 (m,
2H), 7.67–7.58 (m, 5H), 2.86–2.64 (m, 2H), 1.81–1.70 (m, 2H), 1.45–1.35 (m,
2H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): d 173.2, 166.5, 157.5,
133.2, 131.7, 129.9, 129.4, 129.3, 129.3, 128.7, 128.2, 128.0, 127.0, 123.6, 33.1,
28.4, 22.0, 14.1; FABMS: m/z 422.138 [M++H]; Compound 12b: White Solid
(328.8 mg, 52.4%); mp 253.7; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): d 14.16 (s, 1H,
NH), 9.61 (s, 1H, NH), 7.85 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.59–7.40
(m, 4H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 2.22 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 1.73–1.56 (m, 6H), 1.17–1.10 (m,
3H), 0.98–0.91 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): d 172.4, 163.9, 139.4,
133.9, 133.2, 129.9, 129.3, 128.8, 127.4, 124.2, 123.5, 117.0, 102.1, 43.7, 34.9,
33.0, 26.2, 25.9, 21.3; FABMS: m/z 476.185 [M++H]; Compound 13a: White Solid
(211.1 mg, 55.8%); mp 296.5; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): d 9.61 (s, 1H, NH),
7.97 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (d,
J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.21 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 1.69–1.53 (m, 6H), 1.32 (s, 9H),
1.10–1.07 (m, 3H), 0.92 (t, J = 10.6 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): d
172.4, 163.9, 155.6, 133.9, 129.5, 129.3, 128.8, 128.6, 128.2, 126.9, 126.7, 125.7,
120.9, 117.0, 43.7, 35.3, 34.9, 33.1, 31.2, 26.2, 25.9; FABMS: m/z 518.232
[M++H].
22. In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation: Cytotoxic activities of the anticancer drugs
against human cancer cell lines were investigated using the SRB assay or MTT
assay. Human lung cancer (A-549), Human colon adenocarcinoma (HT-29),
Human prostate cancer (DU-145), human ovarian cancer (SK-OV-3) and
human melanoma cancer cell lines (SK-MEL-2) were supplied from the
Korean Cell Line Bank, Seoul National University. All cell lines were grown in
RPMI 1640 (Gibco BRL) supplemented with 10% (V/V) heat inactivated Fetal
Bovine Serum (FBS) and maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with
5% CO2. SRB assay; SRB (Sulforhodamine B) were purchased from Sigma. The
cells (3–7 ꢁ 103 cells/well) were seeded into 96-well plate. Various
concentrations of samples were added to each well in duplicate, then
incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for two days such that time cells are in the
exponential phase of growth at the time of drug addition. After incubation, the
Acknowledgements
This research work was supported by the Seoul R&BD Program
(2G07340). V.N.D. thanks the Korean Government MOEHRD for
Korea Research Foundation Grant (KRF-2007-211-C00028). J.H.K.
also thanks the Korean Government for postdoctoral grant (KRF-
2007-355-C00026).
Reference and notes
1. Gibbs, J. B. Science 2000, 287, 1969.
2. Varmus, H. Science 2006, 312, 1162.
3. (a) Ochi, H.; Miyasaka, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1983, 31, 1228; (b) Skipper, H. E.;
Robins, R. K.; Thompson, J. R. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1955, 89, 594.
4. (a) Rotella, D. P. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2002, 1, 674; (b) Allerton, C. M. N.; Barber,
C. G.; Beaumont, K. C.; Brown, D. G.; Cole, S. M.; Ellis, D.; Lane, C. A. L.; Maw, G.
N.; Mount, N. M.; Rawson, D. J.; Robinson, C. M.; Street, S. D. A.; Summerhill, N.
W. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3581; (c) Bell, A. S.; Brown, D.; Terrett, N. K. Eur.
Patent 463756, 1991.
5. (a) Salem, E. A.; Kendirci, M.; Hellstrom, W. J. Curr. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2006, 7,
661; (b) Carter, A. J.; Ballard, S. A.; Naylor, A. M. J. Urol. 1998, 160, 242; (c)
Doherty, P. C.; Place, V. A.; Smith W. L. US 6037346, 2000.
6. Blokland, A.; Schreiber, R.; Prickaerts, J. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2006, 12, 2511.
7. Ratajczyk, J. D.; Stein, R. G.; Swett, L. R. US 3939161, 1976.
8. Dykes, G. J.; Fletcher, S. R.; Menet, C. J. M.; Merayo, N. M.; Schmitt, B. A.; US
20080242661 A1, 2008.
9. (a) Stehlik, J.; Movsesian, M. A. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 2006, 15, 733; (b) Shin,
J. H.; Ahn, G. J.; Kang, K. K.; Ahn, B. O.; Yoo, M. H. WO 2008153282 A1, 2008.
10. Hamilton, H. W. US 4666908, 1987.
11. Lindell, S. D.; Moloney, B. A.; Hewitt, B. D.; Earnhaw, C. G.; Philip, P. J.; Dancer, J.
E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 1985.
12. Zhu, B.; Strada, S. J. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 437.
13. Sanghvi, Y. S.; Larson, S. B.; Smee, D. F.; Revankar, G. R.; Robins, R. K. Nucleosides
Nucleotides 1991, 10, 1417.
14. Gonzalez, M.; Rodriguez, Z.; Tolon, B.; Rodriguez, J. C.; Velez, H.; Valdes, B.;
Lopez, M. A.; Fini, A. Il Farmaco 2003, 58, 409.
100
left for 30 min at room temperature, washed five times with tap water. The
100 of 0.4% SRB solution was added to each well and left at room
temperature for 30 min. SRB was removed and the plates washed five times
with 1% acetic acid before air drying. Bound SRB was solubilized with 200
10 mM unbuffered Tris-base solution (Sigma) and plates were left on a plate
shaker for at least 10 min. The optical density was measured using
lL of formalin solution were gently added to the wells. Microplates were
l
L
l
L
a
microplate reader (Versamax, Molecular Devices) with a 520 nm wavelength
and the anticancer effective concentration was expressed as an GI50. F(x)=
*
*
(T2 ꢀ T0)/T0 100, T2 < T0 (T2 ꢀ T0)/(C ꢀ T0) 100, T2 > T0 or T2 = T0.; MTT
assay; The cells (5 ꢁ 104 cells/mL) were seeded into 96-well plate. Various
concentrations of samples were added to each well in duplicate, then
incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for two days such that time cells are in the
exponential phase of growth at the time of drug addition. Add 15
solution (Promrga, Cell Titer96) to each well. Incubate the plate at 37 °C for up
to 4 h in a humidified, 5% CO2 atmosphere. After incubation, add 100 L of the
solubilization solution/stop mix (Promrga, Cell Titer96) to each well. Allow the
plate to stand overnight in a sealed container with a humidified atmosphere at
room temperature to completely solubilize the formazan crystals. The optical
lL of the Dye
l
density was measured using
Devices) with a 570 nm wavelegth and the anticancer effective concentration
was expressed as a GI50
a microplate raeder (Versamax, Molecular
.
15. Majid, T.; Hopkins, C. R.; Pedgrift, B.; Collar, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 2137.