Communication
Table 1. Optimization of reaction condition.[a]
Entry
Catalyst [mol%]
Oxidant
T [8C]
Yield [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Cu(OAc)2 (10)
Cu(acac)2 (10)
Cu(OTf)2 (10)
CuBr (10)
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
60
40
25
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
32
14
43
13
27
0
0
0
0
47
56
38
71
trace
26
30
66
trace
0
Cu (10)
Ni(OTf)2 (10)
Ag(OTf)2 (10)
Mg(OTf)2 (10)
In(OTf)3 (10)
Cu(OTf)2 (10)
Cu(OTf)2 (10)
Cu(OTf)2 (10)
Cu(OTf)2 (20)
Cu(OTf)2 (20)
Cu(OTf)2 (20)
Cu(OTf)2 (20)
Cu(OTf)2 (20)
Cu(OTf)2 (20)
–
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
O2
PhI(OAc)2
H2O2
m-CPBA
BQ
–
O2
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.25 mmol), 2a (2.0 mL), in the presence of
catalyst for 12 h. [b] NMR yield, CH2Br2 as an internal standard.
Scheme 2. Substrate scope for the copper-catalyzed reactions between
methanol and sulfonyl hydrazides. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.25 mmol), 2a
(2.0 mL), Cu(OTf)2 (20 mol%), 408C, O2 (balloon), 12 h; yields of isolated
products based on 1.
an oxidant. To our delight, the reaction proceeded and the ex-
pected sulfinate 3aa was obtained in 32% yield (Table 1,
entry 1). Inspired by this result, various copper salts such as
Cu(acac)2, Cu(OTf)2, CuBr, and Cu0 were tested for this transfor-
mation to improve the yield (Table 1, entries 2–5). Cu(OTf)2 was
found to be the best, and the target product 3aa was afforded
in 43% yield (Table 1, entry 3). To further optimize the reaction
conditions, other trifluoromethanesulfonate salts such as
Ni(OTf)2, Ag(OTf)2, Mg(OTf)2, and In(OTf)2 were investigated in
this reaction (Table 1, entries 6–9). However, they did not show
any catalytic activity, and no expected product was formed.
Then, the reaction time and the amount of catalyst were inves-
tigated, and we found that in the presence of 20% mol of
Cu(OTf)2 at 408C for 12 h, the desired product 3aa could be
obtained in the highest yield (71%; Table 1, entry 13). Finally,
other oxidants, such as meta-chloroperbenzoic acid (m-CPBA),
H2O2, or 1,4-benzoquinone (BQ), were used instead of O2, how-
ever, the reaction was not improved (Table 1, entries 15–17).
Almost no desired product was obtained when iodosobenzene
diacetate (PhI(OAc)2) was employed as the oxidant (Table 1,
entry 14). Further optimization of the conditions showed that
the reaction could not proceed without the use of O2 as oxi-
dant (Table 1, entry 18) or without using Cu(OTf)2 as a catalyst
(Table 1, entry 19).
tron-donating groups on the aromatic ring, such as para-Me
(1b), para-OMe (1c), and para-tBu (1d), worked well in these
reactions, resulting in good yields (68–72%, 3ba–3da). Sulfo-
nyl hydrazides substituted by electron-withdrawing groups (F,
Br, Cl and I) could also been tolerated in this reaction with
lower chemical yields (3ea–3ja). It should be mentioned that
halo substituents on the aromatic ring, in particular, the iodo
group, were difficult to be retained in many transition-metal
catalyzed coupling reactions. It is noteworthy that di- and tri-
substituted aryl sulfonyl hydrazides were also suitable sub-
strates to afford the corresponding products (3ka–3ma). How-
ever, only 11 % yield was achieved in the reaction of tri-isopro-
pyl-substituted sulfonyl hydrazide, mainly because of the high
steric hindrance (3na). Naphthalene-1-sulfonohydrazide and
naphthalene-2-sulfonohydrazide could also be employed as
substrates, thereby generating the corresponding products in
69% and 70% yield, respectively (3oa, 3pa).
To extend the utility of this reaction, different alcohol part-
ners (2b–2g) were investigated (Scheme 3). In the case of eth-
anol (2b) and isopropanol (2c), the reactions gave the desired
product with very poor yields (<10%). The other examined al-
cohols (2d–2g) could work in the current system, affording
the desired product with obvious lower yields compared to
the reactions with methanol. This result clearly discloses that
the steric hindrance has an obvious effect on the reaction.[11a]
To gain insight into this reaction mechanism, an ESI-MS
spectroscopic analysis experiment was carried out on the reac-
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we then ex-
amined the substrate scope of this Cu-catalyzed oxidative cou-
pling reaction of methanol with varieties of aryl sulfonyl hydra-
zides (Scheme 2). In general, most of the reactions could pro-
ceed smoothly and afforded the desired sulfinate products in
moderate-to-good yields. In addition, the substrates with elec-
Chem. Asian J. 2016, 11, 478 – 481
479
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim