10.1002/cmdc.202000674
ChemMedChem
COMMUNICATION
Synthesis
or mechanical hyperalgesia12 in neuropathic-pain models.
The synthesis of 3HPXs is depicted in Scheme 2.
Diastereomeric glycidic amides 2a and 2b were obtained in high
yield, but moderate diastereomeric ratio from (S)-1 by applying a
modified tandem oxidation of allyl amines to glycidic amides
protocol.23 The modification consists in the use of cyclohexene
(C6H10) as electrophilic scavenger instead of 2-methyl-2-butene.
Regio- and stereoselective ring-opening of glycidic amides 2a
and 2b with the corresponding Grignard reagent (p-F-C6H4MgBr)
via a SN2 displacement to tertiary alcohols 3a and 4bb,
respectively, was achieved by employing CuBr•SMe2 as catalyst
(e. g., 2a to 3a via A; see Scheme 3).[22] On the other hand, ring-
opening of epoxyamides 2a and 2b with retention of the
configuration to 3aa and 4b, respectively, was achieved by using
the same Grignard reagent but different cupper catalyst (CuI).
The retention of the configuration at C-4 can be explained in
terms of an initial SN2 epoxide-ring-opening reaction mediated
by CuI to give a transient trans-halohydrin followed by a
subsequent SN2 subtitution with the aryl cuprate to give the
corresponding alcohols 3aa from 2a and 4b from 2b (e. g., 2a to
3aa via B; see Scheme 3).[22] The four tertiary alcohols 3a, 3aa,
4b and 4bb were subjected to carbonyl reduction with LiAlH4 to
give 5a, 5aa, 6b and 6bb, respectively, in high chemical yields.
Finally, removal of benzyl group of each 3-hydoxy piperidines 5a,
5aa, 6b and 6bb with H2 and Pd(OH)2 under acidic media (4M,
HCl), provided the target products (R,R)-3HPX, (R,S)-3HPX,
Furthermore,
paroxetine
produced
antiallodynic
and
antihyperalgesic effect in diabetic rats.13,24 Consequently, given
the promising results obtained with (R,R)-3HPX, we anticipate
this novel synthetic alkaloid can be seen as a potential drug for
the treatment of neuropathic pain.
In summary, we have achieved a concise asymmetric synthesis
and studied the antiallodynic effect of four novel synthetic
alkaloids from which one of them resulted to be 2.5 time more
bioactive than (-)-paroxetine in neuropathic rats. Although it is
clear that the position and orientation of the hydroxyl group
placed at the C-3 position plays a crucial role in the biological
activity, we have not had further evidence to prove it yet, albeit
further experimental and computational studies are underway to
investigate the action mechanism of this novel highly bioactive
synthetic alkaloid.
Acknowledgements
The authors thankfully acknowledge Consejo Nacional de
Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT). Grant Number: A1-S-21450.
Partial support was provided by BUAP-VIEP.
(S,R)-3HPX,
hydrochloride forms (Scheme 2).
and
(S,S)-3HPX,
respectively,
in
their
Keywords: allodynia • neuropathic pain • paroxetine •
stereoselective synthesis • alkaloids
Pharmacology: antiallodynic effect of paroxetine and
paroxetine analogues in neuropathic rats.
[1]
N. B. Finnerup, S. Haroutounian, P. Kamerman, R. Baron, D. L. H.
Bennett, D. Bouhassira, G. Cruccu, R. Freeman, P. Hansson, T.
Nurmikko, S. N Raja, A. S. C. Rice, J. Serra, B. H. Smith, R.-D. Treede,
T. S. Jensen, Pain. 2016, 157, 1599-1606.
In order to evaluate the antiallodynic effect to paroxetine and the
paroxetine analogues in their hydrochloride form [(R,R)-3HPX,
(R,S)-3HPX, (S,R)-3HPX and (S,S)-3HPX], the animals were
subjected to the L5/L6 spinal nerve ligation (SNL) to produce
tactile allodynia in rats. Fourteen days after SNL surgery, we
observed a decrease of the 50% withdrawal threshold in the
right hind paw in the SNL-vehicle compared to the sham animals.
Intraperitoneal administration of paroxetine (0.1-10 mg/Kg)
showed dose-dependently increased of the withdrawal threshold
(Figure 2A). The antiallodynic effect of paroxetine was observed
2 h after administration, and the dose of 10 mg/kg reached a
maximal percentage of the effect of 75% (Figure 2B) over 6 h,
aproximately (Figure 2).
[2]
O. van Hecke, S. K. Austin, R. A. Khan, B. H. Smith, N. Torrance, Pain.
2014, 155, 654-662.
[3]
[4]
F. Cervero, Exp Brain Res. 2009, 196, 129-137.
B. H. Smith, N. Torrance, M. I. Bennett, A. J. Lee, Clin J Pain. 2007, 23,
143-149.
[5]
L. Colloca, T. Ludman, D. Bouhassira, R. Baron, A. H. Dickenson, D.
Yarnitsky, R. Freeman, A. Truini, N. Attal, N. B Finnerup, C. Eccleston,
E. Kalso, D. L. Bennett, R. H. Dworkin, N. J. Srinivasa, Nat Rev Dis
Primers. 2017, 3, 17002.
[6]
[7]
K. Nagata, T. Imai, T. Yamashita, M. Tsuda, H. Tozaki-Saitoh, K. Inoue,
Mol. Pain 2009, 5:20.
GlaxoSmithKline. Paroxetine and Pediatric and Adolescent Patients.
January 31, 2006. See also studies on Paroxetine-induced suicide as
side-effect: A. Apter, A. Lipschitz, R. Fong, D. J. Carpenter, S.
Krulewicz, J. T. Davies, C. Wilkinson, P. Perera and A. Metz, J. Child.
Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2006, 16, 77.
Intraperitoneal administration of (R,R)-3HPX (Figure 3A and 3B)
and (S,R)-3HPX (Figure 3E and 3F) showed
a dose-
dependently enhanced of the withdrawal threshold. However,
(R,R)-3HPX exhibited the best antiallodynic effect with a dose of
1 mg/Kg at 2 h (Figure 3A) and reached maximal effect (73.9 ±
4.8 %) at 4 h (Figure 3B). Remarkably, the DE50 of this
paroxetine analog is 0.7014 mg/Kg, i.p. while the DE50 of
paroxetine is 1.70 mg/Kg, i.p.; therefore it is clear that (R,R)-
3HPX is more potent that paroxetine in vivo. On the other hand,
(R,S)-3HPX and (S,R)-3HPX showed a modest antiallodynic
effect 34.6 ± 3.1 % (Figure 3C and 3D) and 41.5 ± 8.5 % (Figure
3E and 3F), respectively. Unfortunately, the paroxetine analog
(S,S)-3HPX (Figure 3G and 3H) did not show antiallodynic effect
at any tested doses.
[8]
[9]
N. S. Gunasekara, S. Noble, P. Benfield, Drugs 1998, 55, 85-120.
A. J. Wagstaff, S. M. Cheer, A. J. Matheson, D. Ormrod, K. L. Goa,
Drugs 2002, 62, 655-703.
[10] E. Patetsos, E. Horjales-Araujo, Pain. Res. Manag. 2016, 2016,
2020915.
[11] M. Zarei, M. Sabetkasaei, T. Moini-Zanjani, Iran Biomed. J. 2014, 18,
94-100.
[12] T, Kawano, T, Soga, H. Chi, S. Eguchi, F. Yamazaki, M, Yokoyama,
Neuroreport 2011, 22, 984-988.
[13] T. Iked, Y. Ishida, R. Naono, R. Takeda, H. Abe, T. Nakamura, T.
Nishimori, Neurosci Res. 2009, 63, 42-46.
[14] K. Nagata, T. Imai, T. Yamashita, M. Tsuda, H. Tozaki-Saitoh, K. Inoue,
Mol Pain. 2009, 5, 1-12.
Our results are in agreement with previous studies, where in
acute or sub-acute (7 days) intraperitoneal administration of
paroxetine, attenuated the mechanical allodynia,11 and thermal
[15] T. Kawano, T. Soga, H. Chi, S. Eguchi, F. Yamazaki, M. Yokoyama,
Neuroreport. 2011, 22, 984-988.
4
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.