Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
field TEM image (Figure 6b) indicate that these microcrystals
have a single-crystal orientation.
Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences,
Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
through Grant DE-FG02-07ER15907. B.D.R. and C.D.W.
acknowledge the NSF for GK-12 (DGE-0742540) and IGERT
(DGE-0549503) Fellowships, respectively. C.N. thanks the DOE
and S.J.K. thanks NSF-MIRT (DMR-1122594).
After growth of the crystal on the silicon wafer, OFETs with a
microcrystal of 4j as the active channel in the device were
constructed.16 Figure 7a is a schematic of such a device, and
Figure 7b is an OM of a device.17 To construct the device, the
surface of the SiO2 interface was passivated with a monolayer of
octadecyltrichlorosilane. This treatment has been shown
previously to reduce the trap sites at the dielectric−semi-
conductor interface.18 The Au source and drain electrodes were
thermally deposited through a TEM grid to form a top-contact
bottom-gate transistor. The work function of Au is ca. 5.0 eV,
meaning that both holes and electrons can be injected from Au
into 4j single crystals through the Schottky barrier at the metal−
semiconductor contact.19
REFERENCES
■
(1) (a) Functional Organic Materials; Muller, T. J. J., Bunz, U. H. F.,
̈
Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2007. (b) Organic Light
Emitting Devices: Synthesis, Properties and Applications; Mullen, K.,
Scherf, U., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006. (c) Carbon-
Rich Compounds; Haley, M. M., Tykwinski, R. R., Eds.; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, Germany, 2006.
(2) (a) Anthony, J. E. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 5028. (b) Anthony, J. E.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 452.
(3) Chase, D. T.; Rose, B. D.; Zakharov, L. N.; Haley, M. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1227.
Figure 7c,d shows the transfer characteristics of the 4j OFET
measured in a N2-filled glovebox. The transfer curves clearly
exhibit ambipolar current modulation. The field-effect mobility
was calculated from the slope of a plot of the square root of the
drain current (IDS) versus gate voltage (VG) in the saturation
(4) For example, see: (a) Saito, M.; Nakamura, M.; Tajima, T.
Chem.Eur. J. 2008, 14, 6062. (b) Kawase, T.; Konishi, A.; Hirao, Y.;
Matsumoto, K.; Kurata, H.; Kubo, T. Chem.Eur. J. 2009, 15, 2653.
(c) Zerubba, U. L.; Tilley, T. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2796.
(d) Zhang, H.; Karasawa, T.; Yamada, H.; Wakamiya, A.; Yamaguchi, S.
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3076. (e) Saito, M. Symmetry 2010, 2, 950.
(f) Zerubba, U. L.; Tilley, T. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11012.
(g) Kawase, T.; Fujiwara, T.; Kitamura, C.; Konishi, A.; Hirao, Y.;
Matsumoto, K.; Kurata, H.; Kubo, T.; Shinamura, S.; Mori, H.; Miyazaki,
E.; Takimiya, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7728.
(5) Chase, D. T.; Fix, A. G.; Rose, B. D.; Weber, C. D.; Nobusue, S.;
Stockwell, C. E.; Zakharov, L. N.; Lonergan, M. C.; Haley, M. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 11103.
(6) Rose, B. D.; Chase, D. T.; Weber, C. D.; Zakharov, L. N.; Lonergan,
M. C.; Haley, M. M. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2106.
(7) (a) Anthony, J. E.; Facchetti, A.; Heeney, M.; Marder, S. R.; Zhan,
X. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3876. (b) Dong, H.; Wang, C.; Hu, W. Chem.
Commun. 2010, 46, 5211. (c) Mikroyannidis, J. A.; Kabanakis, A. N.;
Sharma, S. S.; Sharma, G. D. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 746.
(8) Shimizu, A.; Tobe, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6906.
(9) Reisch, H.; Wiesler, U.; Scherf, U.; Tuytuylkov, N. Macromolecules
1996, 29, 8204.
(10) Merlet, S.; Birau, M.; Wang, Z. Y. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2157.
(11) Kaur, I.; Jia, W.; Kopreski, R. P.; Selvarasah, S.; Dokmeci, M. R.;
Pramanik, C.; McGruer, N. E.; Miller, G. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
16274.
regime. The field-effect mobility can be calculated using IDS
=
(W/2L)Ciμ(VG − VT)2, where W and L are the width and length
of the channel and Ci (=17.8 nF cm−2), μ, and VT correspond to
the capacitance per unit area of the gate insulator, the field-effect
mobility, and the threshold voltage, respectively. The field-effect
hole and electron mobilities extracted from the 4j single crystal
ambipolar transistor are 7 × 10−4 and 3 × 10−3 cm2 V−1 s−1 in the
saturation regime, respectively.20 The HOMO and LUMO levels
of diaryl-IF 4j create well-balanced ambipolar OFETs with Au
electrodes because the work function of the electrodes is in the
middle of the gap. Interestingly, there are very few ambipolar
OFETs made from single crystals of organic semiconductors.21
In conclusion, we have prepared a family of 6,12-diarylindeno-
[1,2-b]fluorenes and shown that aryl substitution can signifi-
cantly affect the redox properties of the molecules. In cyclic
voltammetry experiments, the diaryl-IFs can either accept or
donate two electrons. Pentafluorophenyl-substituted IF 4j was
utilized as the active element in a single-crystal OFET that
exhibited ambipolar behavior with Au source/drain contacts.
Future work will focus on additional indenofluorene topologies
and molecule functionalization as well as further device studies.
(12) Almenningen, A.; Bastiansen, O.; Fernholt, L.; Cyvin, B. N.;
Cyvin, S. J.; Samdal, S. J. Mol. Struct. 1985, 128, 59.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
Experimental details, NMR and absorption spectra, CVs, and
computational data for 4a−j; CIF file for 4c; OFET fabrication
details for 4j. This material is available free of charge via the
■
(13) Reiss, H.; Heller, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 4207.
(14) 6,13-Bis(TIPS-ethynyl)pentacene values corrected vs SCE.
(15) Balakrishnan, K.; Datar, A.; Oitker, R.; Chen, H.; Zuo, J. M.; Zang,
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10496.
(16) Kang, S. J.; Bae, I.; Park, Y. J.; Park, T. H.; Sung, J.; Yoon, S. C.;
Kim, K. H.; Choi, D. H.; Park, C. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 1609.
(17) Thin films of 4j were inactive in OFETs, likely because of the
morphology of the films and the dielectric interface.
(18) Chua, L. L.; Zaumseil, J.; Chang, J. F.; Ou, E. C. W.; Ho, P. K. H.;
Sirringhaus, H.; Friend, R. H. Nature 2005, 434, 194.
(19) (a) Chen, Z. Y.; Lee, M. J.; Ashraf, R. S.; Gu, Y.; Albert-Seifried, S.;
Nielsen, M. M.; Schroeder, B.; Anthopoulos, T. D.; Heeney, M.;
McCulloch, I.; Sirringhaus, H. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 647. (b) Zaumseil,
J.; Sirringhaus, H. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1296.
S
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
Present Address
§Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of
Texas, Austin, Texas 78712.
(20) We tested only 4j because it readily grew crystals, but the
HOMO/LUMO levels of the other diaryl-IFs indicate that these too will
be active in OFETs, research on which is ongoing.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
(21) (a) de Boer, R. W. I.; Stassen, A. F.; Craciun, M. F.; Mulder, C. L.;
Molinari, A.; Rogge, S.; Morpurgo, A. F. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86,
No. 262109. (b) Takahashi, T.; Takenobu, T.; Takeya, J.; Iwasa, Y. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, No. 033505.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
We thank the National Science Foundation (CHE-1013032) for
support of this research and for instrumentation grant support
(CHE-0923589). The electrochemical work was funded by the
10352
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja303402p | J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10349−10352