manipulations can generate alternate analogues of 1,3
more specifically TM-025 (4) and TM-026 (5) which dis-
play activity against both chloroquine resistant and chloro-
quine sensitive P. falciparum (IC50 = 25ꢀ30 nm), but
display significantly reduced cytotoxicity toward mamma-
lian cells (HCT116, IC50 > 1 mM). While it is unclear if
these analogues maintain pactamycin’s mechanism of ac-
tion, it does suggest that this scaffold holds promise for the
development of efficacious agents against biomedically
significant pathogens.
carbonate group on O70 might serve well to establish the
relative stereochemistry at C4ꢀC5 as depicted in Figure
2A.17 A hypothetical transition state leading to the ring-
opened epoxide, however, reveals a highly destabilizing
syn-pentaneinteraction if the correct stereochemistry atC7
is present.
This led us to consider a ring-opening cascade in which
the incorrect stereochemistry at C7 would be introduced
but invertedby acascade cyclization of apendantamideon
N1 (Figure 2B). Herein we report our progress in imple-
menting this strategy.
Figure 1. Pactamycin and its structural relatives.
Pactamycin’sstructure, elucidated in1972, ishighlighted
by six contiguous stereogenic centers, three of which are
quaternary, with all five positions of the cyclopentane core
functionalized.14 Being the most complex of the aminocy-
lopentitol antibiotics, it is not surprising that the chemical
synthesis of pactamycin presents a significant challenge.
Only two approaches to 1 had been reported prior to the
recent total synthesis by Hanessian’s group.15,16 Even with
this monumental accomplishment, structural manipula-
tions to the scaffold are hampered by its extreme complex-
ity, and its synthetic difficulty has prevented any noteworthy
structureꢀactivity relationship studies.
Figure 2. O7-assisted epoxide ring-opening cascade design.
Installation of the opposite stereochemistry at C7 is
easily accomplished by formation of the oxazoline (6) from
L-threonine as described by Balavoine.18 The enolate of 6
can be alkylated with 5-iodo-1-pentene to give 7 (Scheme 1).19
Significant optimization was required to inhibit β-elimina-
tion of the enolate, identifying HMPA as a key additive.
Under optimized conditions, 7 could be obtained as a
single diastereomer in 80% yield.20 This reaction is note-
worthy in that it can be done on a 100 g scale requiring only
a water workup to remove HMPA and no chromatogra-
phy. The methyl ester was then converted to the methyl
ketone 8 in a single operation utilizing conditions reported
by Grabowski and co-workers.21 The terminal olefin was
then oxidatively cleaved to give the aldehyde 8. An intramo-
Concurrently with Hanessian’s efforts, we were inter-
ested in designing a modular synthesis of pactamycin to
address these issues. Similar in approach, we had recog-
nized threonine as an obvious synthon from which to begin
our campaign as it contains the stereochemcial informa-
tion needed at C7 and C1. However, a key feature in our
approach was to relay the stereochemistry at C7 to the
antidiol functionality present at C4/C5. We envisioned
that an intramolecular epoxide opening by a pendant
€
lecular aldol condensation promoted by SiO2 and Hunig’s
base in toluene at 70 °C afforded the spirocyclic cyclopente-
nal 9 in 75% yield. Oxidation of the unfunctionalized
cyclopentane carbon at C3 was accomplished by radical
bromination.22 To our delight this provided 10 as a single
diastereomer, albeit in modest yield. As long as reaction
(14) Duchamp, D. J. Abstracts J. Am. Crystal. Assoc. Winter Meet-
ing; Albuquerque, 1972, April, 23.
(15) For partial syntheses, see: (a) Knapp, S.; Younong, Y. Org. Lett.
2007, 9, 1359. (b) Tsujimoto, T.; Nishikawa, T.; Urabe, T.; Isobe, M.
Synlett. 2005, 433. (c) Malinowski, J. T.; McCarver, S. J.; Johnson, J. S.
Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2878.
(16) Hanessian, S.; Vakiti, R. R.; Dorich, S.; Banerjee, S.; Lecomte,
^
F.; DelValle, J. R.; Zhang, J.; Deschenes-Simard, B. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 3497.
(17) For selected epoxide cascade reactions, see: (a) Vilotijevic, I.;
Jamison, T. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5250. (b) Feng, X.; Shu,
L.; Shi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11002. (c) Molander, G. A.;
Pozo Losada, C. D. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2935. (d) Minami, A.;
Migita, A.; Inada, D.; Hotta, K.; Watanabe, K.; Oguri, H.; Oikawa, H.
Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1638.
ꢀ
(18) Aıt-Haddou, H.; Hoarau, O.; Cramailere, D.; Pezet, F.; Daren,
¨
J.; Balavoine, G. G. A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2004, 10, 699.
(19) For the synthesis of 5-iodo-pentene from 5-bromo-pentene, see:
Shi, B.; Hawryluk, N. A.; Snider, B. B. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1030.
(20) Reddy, L. R.; Fournier, J.; Subba Reddy, B. V.; Corey, E. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8974.
(21) Williams, J. M.; Jobson, R. B.; Nobuyoshi, Y.; Marchesini, G.;
Dolling, U.; Grabowski, E. J. Tetrahedron. Lett. 1995, 36, 5461.
(22) Hattori, K.; Kido, Y.; Yamamoto, H.; Ishida, J.; Iwashita, A.;
Mihara, K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 5577.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 14, 2012
3633