.
Angewandte
Communications
that intramolecular trans carboalkoxylation product 2a was
obtained as the major product along with the minor cyclo-
isomerization product, 3a (Table 1, entry 1). Screening of
biaryl bisphosphine ligands (Figure 1; Table 1, entries 1–6)
revealed that the selectivities between 2a and 3a depend on
the dihedral angles and steric bulk of the biaryl bisphosphine
ligands (dihedral angle: H8-binap > binap > segphos >
biphep,[13] 2a/3a: biphep > segphos > binap > H8-binap;
steric bulk: xyl-binap > tol-binap > binap, 2a/3a: xyl-
binap > tol-binap > binap). Non-biaryl bisphosphine ligands
were also examined and moderate selectivities were observed
(Figure 1; Table 1, entries 7 and 8). Although biphep showed
the highest selectivity for 2a over 3a, binap showed the
highest catalytic activity. Thus, reaction conditions were
further optimized using binap as a ligand. Gratifyingly, the
use of chlorobenzene as a solvent significantly improved the
yield of 2a (entry 9). The catalyst loading could be reduced to
5 mol% (entry 10), and increasing the reaction temperature
to 908C further improved the yield of 2a (entry 11).
Importantly, platinum, gold, and palladium complexes,
which are known to catalyze the cyclization of allyl or
benzyl 2-alkynylphenyl ethers, failed to catalyze the forma-
tion of 2a and 3a (entries 12–14).[14]
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we
explored the scope of the cyclization of 1,6-enynes catalyzed
by a cationic rhodium(I)/binap complex, as shown in Table 2.
With respect to the substituent at the alkyne terminus,[15] not
only n-butyl (1a, entry 1), but also phenylpropyl and chlor-
opropyl substituted alkynes (1b,c, entries 2 and 3) furnished
the desired naphthofurans 2a–c in high yields. Terminal
alkyne 1d (entry 4) could be employed, although the product
yield was moderate. Alkenyl- and arylacetylene derivatives
(1e–g, entries 5–7) were also suitable substrates for
this process and gave the desired naphthofurans 2e–
g in good yields. The 1,6-enynes 1h–k, which possess
secondary alkyl groups at the alkyne termini,
afforded naphthopyranes 4h–k as major products
and naphthofurans 2h–k as minor products
Table 1: Optimization of reaction conditions for the transition-metal-catalyzed
cyclization of 1,6-enyne 1a.[a]
(entries 8–11).
However,
cyclopropylacetylene
derivative 1l (entry 12) afforded naphthofuran 2l
as the sole product. The reaction of racemic 1,6-
enyne 1i using the cationic rhodium(I)/(R)-binap
catalyst furnished enantioenriched naphthofuran 2i
and racemic naphthopyran 4i (entry 9). With respect
to the aryl ether moiety, the reactions of phenol-
linked 1,6-enynes 1m,n afforded benzofurans
2m,n[16] in low yields (entries 13 and 14). Also,
phenol-linked 1,6-enyne 1o afforded benzopyrane
4o (entry 15), although the yield was lower than for
naphthopyrane 4h (entry 8).
Entry Catalyst
Solvent
Conditions Conv. Yield[%][b]
[%]
(2a/3a)[c]
1
[Rh(cod)2]BF4/binap
(CH2Cl)2 808C, 1 h
100
80
95
95
90
52
66
85
100
100
100
100
100
0
76 (4:1)
44 (2:1)
49 (20:1)
35 (25:1)
58 (5:1)
18 (8:1)
22 (5:1)
41 (5:1)
88 (25:1)
86 (25:1)
88 (>50:1)
0
2
[Rh(cod)2]BF4/H8-binap (CH2Cl)2 808C, 1 h
3
4
[Rh(cod)2]BF4/segphos
[Rh(cod)2]BF4/biphep
(CH2Cl)2 808C, 2 h
(CH2Cl)2 808C, 1 h
5
[Rh(cod)2]BF4/tol-binap (CH2Cl)2 808C, 3 h
6
7
8
9
[Rh(cod)2]BF4/xyl-binap
[Rh(cod)2]BF4/dppb
[Rh(cod)2]BF4/dppf
[Rh(cod)2]BF4/binap
[Rh(cod)2]BF4/binap
[Rh(cod)2]BF4/binap
PtCl2
(CH2Cl)2 808C, 3 h
(CH2Cl)2 808C, 3 h
(CH2Cl)2 808C, 3 h
ClC6H5
ClC6H5
ClC6H5
(CH2Cl)2 808C, 16 h
(CH2Cl)2 808C, 16 h
THF
The double intramolecular cyclization of 1p also
proceeded to give the corresponding blue-emitting
808C, 1 h
808C, 1 h
908C, 1 h
10[d]
11[d]
12[e]
13[e]
14[e]
benzene-linked
bis(vinylnaphthofuran)
2p
(Scheme 3).[17] This product showed a high quantum
yield of 73% in CHCl3 solution and could be
employed as a light-emitting polymerization unit.
The transformation of cyclization products was
also briefly examined. Diels–Alder reactions
between naphthofurans 2a,d and N-methylmale-
imide (5) gave pentacyclic compounds 6a,d in good
yields and as single diastereomers (Scheme 4).[18] The
Diels–Alder reaction between 5 and naphthopyran
4h also proceeded to give pentacyclic compound 7 in
AuCl(PPh3)/AgBF4
Pd(PPh3)4, K2CO3
0
0
[f]
908C, 1 h
[a] Catalyst (0.010 mmol, 10 mol%), 1a (0.10 mmol), and solvent (1.0 mL) were
used. [b] Yield of isolated product. [c] Determined by H NMR spectroscopy.
[d] Catalyst (0.010 mmol, 5 mol%), 1a (0.20 mmol), and solvent (3.0 mL) were
used. [e] 20 mol% of catalyst was used. [f] 0.50 mmol. Cod=1,5-cyclooctadiene.
1
good yield and as a single diastereomer (Scheme 4).[19] The
structure of 7 was unambiguously confirmed by X-ray
crystallographic analysis.[20]
A possible mechanism for the rhodium-catalyzed cycliza-
tion reactions of 1,6-enynes 1 leading to benzofurans 2 and 3,
and benzopyrans 4 is shown in Scheme 5. The 1,6-enyne
1 reacts with rhodium to generate rhodacyclopentene A.[21]
Subsequent b-hydride elimination of the propargylic hydro-
gen affords rhodium hydride B. Reductive elimination
followed by double bond isomerization[22] affords naphtho-
furan 3. Alternatively, a b-oxygen elimination from rhodacy-
clopentene A, followed by aryl–alkenyl single bond rotation
Figure 1. Structures of bisphosphine ligands.
2
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!