H.-H. Lin et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 3304–3307
3307
Table 2
Acknowledgements
Antiproliferative activity of compounds 9a–c against three human cancer cell lines
S
This work was supported by National Natural Science Founda-
tion of China (Project Nos. 20972099 and 31130017), Beijing Muni-
cipal Commission of Education (Project No. KZ201210028035), the
973 project 2013CB911000, and the Funding Project for Academic
Human Resources Development in Institutions of Higher Learning
Under the Jurisdiction of Beijing Municipality (PHR20110508).
N
H
N
N
H
R2
R1
O
N
H
9a-c
Compound
R1
R2
IC50 (lM) SD
Supplementary data
A549
MCF-7
HCT-116
9a
9b
9c
H
5-Cl
5-Cl
H
H
>100a
33.14 1.04
>100
>100
35.00 0.90
>100
>100
30.76 0.21
>100
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
2,4-diCH3
a
IC50 >100
lM indicates that cell proliferation inhibition is lower than 50% at the
concentration of 100
l
M.
References and notes
1. Prakash, C. R.; Raja, S. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 98.
2. Vine, K. L.; Matesic, L.; Locke, J. M.; Ranson, M.; Skropeta, D. Anti-Cancer Agents
Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 397.
3. Chow, L. Q.; Eckhardt, S. G. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007, 25, 884.
4. Krishnan, K.; Prathiba, K.; Jayaprakash, V.; Basu, A.; Mishra, N.; Zhou, B. S.; Hub,
S.; Yen, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 6248.
activity against A549, MCF-7 and HCT-116 cells (IC50, 33.14, 35.0
and 30.76 M), however it was less potent than its counterpart
5f (IC50, 7.34, 10.39 and 3.49 M) and most of compounds listed
l
l
in Table 1. Although other indolin-2-one derivatives bearing N-
phenylhydrazinecarbothioamide moiety also showed antitumor
activities,13,14 our results indicate that the presence of piperazine
moiety between the hydrazinecarbothioamide moiety and phenyl
ring is essential for generating or improving the antiproliferative
activity.
In conclusion, we synthesized a set of piperazine-1-carbo-
thiohydrazide derivatives of indole-2-one and evaluated for their
antiproliferative activity against A549, MCF-7 and HCT-116 cell
lines. Varying the substituents (R1) at the indolin-2-one scaffold
showed that the presence of a substituent at the 5-position is
important for the antiproliferative activity, with 5-chloro substi-
tuted compound 5f being the most potent with IC50 values of
5. Lessa, J. A.; Mendes, I. C.; da Silva, P. R. O.; Soares, M. A.; dos Santos, R. G.;
Speziali, N. L.; Romeiro, N. C.; Barreiro, E. J.; Beraldo, H. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010,
45, 5671.
6. Yu, Y.; Kalinowski, D. S.; Kovacevic, Z.; Siafakas, A. R.; Jansson, P. J.; Stefani, C.;
Lovejoy, D. B.; Sharpe, P. C.; Bernhardt, P. V.; Richardson, D. R. J. Med. Chem.
2009, 52, 5271.
7. Zeglis, B. M.; Divilov, V.; Lewis, J. S. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 2391.
8. Giles, F. J.; Fracasso, P. M.; Kantarjian, H. M.; Cortes, J. E.; Brown, R. A.;
Verstovsek, S.; Alvarado, Y.; Thomas, D. A.; Faderl, S.; Garcia-Manero, G.;
Wright, L. P.; Samson, T.; Cahill, A.; Lambert, P.; Plunkett, W.; Sznol, M.;
DiPersio, J. F.; Gandhi, V. Leuk. Res. 2003, 27, 1077.
9. Ma, B.; Goh, B. C.; Tan, E. H.; Lam, K. C.; Soo, R.; Leong, S. S.; Wang, L. Z.; Mo, F.;
Chan, A. T.; Zee, B.; Mok, T. A. Invest. New Drugs 2008, 26, 169.
10. Karali, N. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 37, 909.
11. Solomon, V. R.; Hua, C. K.; Lee, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 1563.
12. Karki, S. S.; Kulkarni, A.; Teraiya, N.; Clercq, E. D.; Balzarini, J. Med. Chem. Res.
2011, 20, 1229.
13. Hall, M. D.; Salam, N. K.; Hellawell, J. L.; Fales, H. M.; Kensler, C. B.; Ludwig, J. A.;
Szakacs, G.; Hibbs, D. E.; Gottesman, M. M. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 3191.
14. Hall, M. D.; Brimacombe, K. R.; Varonka, M. S.; Pluchino, K. M.; Monda, J. K.; Li,
J. Y.; Walsh, M. J.; Boxer, M. B.; Warren, T. H.; Fales, H. M.; Gottesman, M. M. J.
Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 5878.
15. Cao, S. L.; Feng, Y. P.; Jiang, Y. Y.; Liu, S. Y.; Ding, G. Y.; Li, R. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2005, 15, 1915.
16. Cao, S. L.; Han, Y.; Yuan, C. Z.; Wang, Y.; Xiahou, Z. K.; Liao, J.; Gao, R. T.; Mao, B.
7.34, 10.39 and 3.49 lM against A549, MCF-7 and HCT-116 cells,
respectively. Moreover, introduction of a substituent (R2) into the
20-position, instead of 40-position, of the phenyl group connected
with piperazine ring was favorable for retaining the activity and
the steric effect of substituents was more important for the
potency than the electronic effect. Thus, compounds 6c (R2 = 20-
CH3), 6f (R2 = 20-Cl) and 6l (R2 = 20-NO2) exhibited comparable
antiproliferative activity against HCT-116 cells to Sunitinib, while
compound 6d (R2 = 20,40-diCH3) was the most potent against
A549 cells. Further studies to investigate the possible mechanism
of action of the active compounds are currently in progress.
17. Klayman, D. L.; Bartosevich, J. F.; Griffin, T. S.; Mason, C. J.; Scovill, J. P. J. Med.
Chem. 1979, 22, 855.
18. Abadi, A. H.; Abou-Seri, S. M.; Abdel-Rahman, D. E.; Klein, C.; Lozach, O.; Meijer,
L. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 41, 296.