9048
J. Chiba et al. / Tetrahedron 68 (2012) 9045e9049
Table 3
associated with the physical properties of the artificial duplexes
that show almost the same thermal stabilities with natural DNA
duplexes.
Evaluation of furanose ring conformation for T*2mer in D2O
S10/Hz
S20/Hz
S200/Hz
S30/Hz
Xsa
P/deg
Typeb
dT*p-c
-pdT*e
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
30.8
ndf
30.8
30.8
22.5
ndf
21.6
21.1
12.3
ndf
12.8
11.5
0.91
0.91
d
120d
E1/OT1
ndf
ndf
4. Experimental section
g
117ꢃ
126ꢃ
117
126
E1/OT1
E1
g
d
4.1. ESI-TOF mass measurements of T*-oligomers
a
Approximate mol fraction of S-type conformer (Xsꢂ0.05). Xs¼(S10ꢁ9.4)/
(15.7e9.4)23
.
ESI-TOF mass spectra were recorded on a JEOL JMS-T100LC mass
spectrometer operating in the positive ion mode with MeOH or H2O
as a solvent (Fig. S5). DMTr, TBDMS-protected T*2mer: calcd for
MNaþ, C54H62N5O14PSiNa: 1086.37; found 1086.33, DMTr, TBDMS-
protected T*3mer: calcd for MNaþ, C69H78N8O21P2SiNa: 1467.44;
found 1467.29, DMTr, TBDMS-protected T*4mer: calcd for MNaþ,
b
c
See Fig. 2 for conformer definitions.
The 50-side furanose ring of T*2mer.
Estimation from the calculated values in Ref. 23. Fm¼28ꢃ and root mean square
d
(rms)¼0.5 Hz.
e
The 30-side furanose ring of T*2mer.
f
Not determined.
g
The values (Fm¼28ꢃ) from PSEUROT (version 5.4) calculation in Ref. 23.
C
84H94N11O28P3SiNa: 1848.52; found 1849.29, DMTr, TBDMS-
protected T*5mer: calcd for MNaþ, C99H110N14O35P4SiNa:
2229.59; found 2230.21, TBDMS-protected T*2mer: calcd for
MNaþ, C33H44N5O12PSiNa: 784.24; found 784.06, TBDMS-protected
T*3mer: calcd for MNaþ, C48H60N8O19P2SiNa: 1165.31; found
conformations with their approximate equilibrium composition by
fitting the experimental data of the three-bond 1He1H coupling
constants (3JHH). Table 3 summarizes the results of the pseudor-
otational analysis in terms of T*2mer. The 50-side alkynylribose in
T*2mer (50-dT*pdT*-30) is referred to as ‘dT*p-’, while the 30-side as
‘-pdT*’ in Table 3. The calculated mol fraction of S-type conformer
(Xs) for the both furanose rings is 0.91ꢂ0.05, indicating the S-
1165.13,
TBDMS-protected
T*4mer:
calcd
for
MNaþ,
C
63H76N11O26P3SiNa: 1546.38; found 1546.34, T*2mer: calcd for
MHþ, C24H28N4O12P: 595.14; found 595.13, T*3mer: calcd for
MNaþ, C36H40N6O19P2: 945.17; found 945.02, T*4mer: calcd for
MNaþ, C48H53N8O26P3Na: 1273.22; found 1273.16, T*5mer: calcd
for MNaþ, C60H66N10O33P4Na: 1601.26; found 1601.12.
conformer preference of alkynylribose in T*2mer. Fortunately, we
could get important JHH vicinal coupling constants including J1 2
3
0
0
,
0
00
0
00
0
0
00
0
0 0
J1 2 , J2 2 , J2 3 , J2 3 , and J3 4 for ‘dT*p-’. These values are organized
4.2. Detailed assignments of 1H NMR spectra for dT* nucleo-
side and T*2mer in D2O
into eqs. 5e8 in order to compare with the calculated values in
Ref. 23 (Table 3).
X
10 ¼ J1020 þ J10200
(5)
(6)
dT* (See Fig. S6, the same annotation with 3). 1H NMR (500 MHz,
D2O, TSP-d4)
d
7.95 (s, 1H, H6), 5.03 (t, J¼8.0 Hz, 1H, H10), 4.41 (ddd,
J¼3.0(H4 ), 3.25, 4.75 Hz, 1H, H30), 3.96 (ddd, J¼3.0(H3 ), 4.5(H5 )
0
0
0
,
X
X
X
6.0(H5 ) Hz, 1H, H40), 3.71 (dd, J¼4.5(H4 ), 12.0(geminal) Hz, 1H, H50),
20 ¼ J1020 þ J2030 þ J20200
00
0
3.66 (dd, J¼6.0(H4 ), 12.0(geminal) Hz, 1H, H500), 3.40 (s, 3H, N-Me),
0
2.32e2.30 (dd, J¼4.3, 7.8 Hz, 2H, H20 and H200) ppm.
T*2mer (see Fig. 3B). 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O, TSP-d4)
d 8.00 (s,
200 ¼ J10200 þ J20030 þ J20200
(7)
1H, H6), 7.94 (s, 1H, H60), 5.05 (dd, J¼6.5(Hi), 9.0(Hh) Hz, 1H, Hg), 4.99
(dd, J¼6.0(Hc), 9.5(Hb) Hz, 1H, Ha), 4.73 (septet [ddd], J¼2.5(Hc and He)
,
7.3(Hb) Hz, 1H, Hd), 4.53 (fivlet [ddd], J¼2.5(Hk), 5.0 Hz, 1H, Hj), 4.13
(ddd, J¼2.5(Hd), 4.0(Hf or Hf ), 5.5(Hf or Hf ) Hz, 1H, He), 4.10 (dt [ddd],
0
00
0
00
30 ¼ J2030 þ J20030 þ J3040
(8)
0
00
J¼2.5(Hj), 6.5(Hl) Hz, 1H, Hk), 3.99e3.97 (m, 2H, Hl and Hl ), 3.75 (dd,
0
00
J¼4.0(He), 12.3(geminal) Hz, 001H, Hf or Hf ), 3.70 (dd, J¼5.5(He)
,
In the case of ‘dT*p-’, experimental S10, S20, S200, and S30 (eqs.
5e8) were in good agreement with the calculated values having P
between 117ꢃ and 126ꢃ. The best-fitted P is 120ꢃ (Xs¼0.91, Fm¼28ꢃ,
and root mean square (rms)¼0.5 Hz), indicating that the sugar
conformation is biased toward S (ca. 91%) with C10-exo/O-endo-C10-
exo (E1/OT1) conformer. All of the P values obtained from dT* and
T*2mer show that 10-alkynyldeoxyribose prefers around C10-exo
conformation within the S-type category. C10-exo conformer
(108ꢃ<P<144ꢃ) can easily transform to C20-endo, B-DNA-favoring
structure (144ꢃ<P<180ꢃ) with relatively low energy barriers
compared to furanoses in the N-type family. This S-type similarity
of the sugar-puckering mode may result in the closeness of higher-
order structures and physical properties between the artificial DNA
and native B-DNA as described in our previous report.17
0
12.3(geminal) Hz, 1H, Hf or Hf ), 3.40 (s, 3H, N-Me), 3.36 (s, 3H, N-Me),
2.60 (ddd, J¼2.5(Hd), 6.0(Ha), 14.0(geminal) Hz, 1H, Hc), 2.36e2.29 (m,
3H, Hb and Hh and Hi) ppm.
4.3. X-ray analysis of dT*
A single crystal of nucleoside dT* suitable for X-ray analysis was
obtained from H2O with vapor diffusion of EtOH. Measurements
were made on a Rigaku RAXIS RAPID imaging plate diffractometer
with graphite monochromated Cu-Ka radiation at 40 kV and 30 mA.
A colorless chip crystal of C12H16N2O6 (]C12H14N2O5$H2O) is
ꢀ
monoclinic, space group P21(#4), with a¼10.3322(4) A,
3
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
b¼5.3618(2) A, and c¼23.9597(9) A, V¼1311.3(1) A , Z¼4 with
calculated density 1.440 g/cm3. The data were collected at room
temperature to a maximum 2q
value of 136.4ꢃ. Of the 11,791 re-
3. Conclusion
flections that were collected, 4497 were unique (Rint¼0.086);
equivalent reflections were merged. The linear absorption co-
In summary, we demonstrated a large-scale synthesis of the
alkynyl C-nucleotide oligomers and the detailed analysis about the
puckering conformations of the alkynylribose rings. Not only from
1H NMR studies in aqueous media but also from X-ray crystal
analysis, the sugar rings of the T* monomer and the dimer are
substantially biased toward the S-type conformer that exists in
native B-DNAs. This structural resemblance would be strongly
efficient, m, for Cu-Ka
radiation is 9.972 cmꢁ1. An empirical ab-
sorption correction was applied, which resulted in transmission
factors ranging from 0.726 to 0.980. The data were corrected for
Lorentz and polarization effects. The structure was solved by direct
method (SHELX 9728) and refined by full-matrix least-squares cal-
culations. The non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically.
Four hydrogen atoms of the included water molecules were