.
Angewandte
Communications
À
Table 1: Formation of N H sulfoximines.
process also worked with 7b, affording 9b in 43% yield.
Interestingly, if the reaction was allowed to proceed for
around 24 hours, thiazines 10 were isolated as a mixture of
diastereomers. The stereochemistry of 10a was verified by X-
ray crystallography. To the best of our knowledge, cyclic
sulfoximines, such as 9a/b, are unknown. It also appears that
dihydrothiazines, such as 10a/b, have not been reported.
The mechanism for this reaction presumably begins with
an intramolecular hydride migration in 7a to generate 11a
(Scheme 4). This type of hydride shift appears to be unique.
Generally, examples of the tert-amino effect and related
reactions with ethers involve 6-exo-trig or 7-endo-trig migra-
tions, if one includes the migrating hydrogen atom in the
Entry 12 R1
R2
13 Yield [%] 14 Yield [%]
1[a,h]
2[b]
a
a
a
b
b
c
d
e
f
H
H
H
nPr
nPr
Ph
Me
Me
Me
Ph
Ph
Ph
a
a
a
b
b
c
d
a
a
a
a
a
–
a
a
a
b
b
b
c
d
b
b
e
f
–
–
–
–
–
72
34
–
3[c,i]
4[a,j]
5[b]
42
52
39
83
81
62
86
82
6[d]
–
–
7[e]
2-furyl vinyl
8[f]
H
H
H
H
H
PhCHCH
Ph
Ph
4-OMe-C6H4
4-Br-C6H4
76
60
–
80
34
9[f]
10[g]
11[f]
12[f]
f
g
h
[a] MeOH, microwave, 1308C, 30 min. [b] nPrOH, microwave, 1708C,
20 min. [c] nPrOH, microwave, 1308C, 2 h. [d] nPrOH, microwave,
1708C, 1.5 h. [e] Toluene/H2O, microwave, 1908C, 2.5 h. [f] Toluene/
nBuOH, reflux, 4 h. [g] THF/MeOH, microwave, 1308C, 20 min. [h] 15a
(R3 =Me) was produced in 77% yield. [i] 15a’ (R3 =nPr) was isolated in
50% yield. [j] 15b (R3 =Me) was produced in 62% yield (d.r.=1:1).
Scheme 4. Proposed mechanism for the formation of 9a from 7a.
count, regardless of the specific mechanism.[9] However, 6-
endo-dig migrations are proposed in pericyclic processes, such
as those that occur in the Crabbe homologation.[10] Further-
more, processes that can be characterized as a 6-endo-trig
hydride transfer are known, but not common.[11] Lastly, there
are other types of hydride transfer that are 6-exo-dig,[12] 5-exo-
trig,[13] 8-exo-trig,[14] and 7-exo-trig[15] processes and others,[16]
the characterization of which is vague using this nomencla-
ture.
Ring closure can be formulated as the intramolecular
collapse of the zwitterion 11a or an electrocyclization.
Though at present we favor the former explanation, a more
definitive answer must await mechanistic studies. For reasons
that remain unclear, no other example of cyclization has been
observed in our studies of other substrates under similar
conditions.
To further explore the scope of the hydride shift, we
examined several changes in the substrate as well as the
reaction conditions (Table 1). At lower temperatures, con-
jugate addition of a nucleophilic solvent could be observed, as
in the conversion of 12a to 15a (entry 1). However, at 1708C
or with a longer reaction time, the product of an intra-
molecular redox reaction, 13a, was produced (entries 2 and
3). This behavior was reproduced in one other system
(entries 4 and 5). Polar solvents facilitate the reaction, as in
the examples already mentioned. The redox process occurs
with alkenyl sulfoximines that are disubstituted (entries 4–6),
but proceeds better with simple vinyl sulfoximines. We note
that N-allylic substituents participate in the reaction
(entries 7–8), and in these cases no cyclization to heterocycles
was observed. Interestingly, three different benzyl substitu-
ents afforded products in nearly the same yield (entries 9, 11,
and 12). Finally, we recorded the yield of aldehydes produced
in this process in several cases. Whether these aldehydes are
formed as a result of adventitious water or a different
mechanism is not clear at present (entries 8, 9, 11, and 12).
Some aspects of the mechanism of this reaction have been
evaluated. Heating 12 f at 1308C in deuterated methanol
afforded [D1]-13a as a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers, as
expected based on the formation of a zwitterionic intermedi-
ate [Eq. (2)]. When the dideuterated sulfoximine [D2]-12 f
was heated in a mixture of toluene and butanol for 8 hours,
the expected deuterated product [D1]-13a’ was produced in
64% yield [Eq. (3)]. Interestingly, under the same reaction
conditions, 12 f required less than 2 hours to give 13a in 81%
yield (Table 1, entry 9). Though this is a very qualitative
observation, it suggests a kinetic isotope effect of around 4, in
keeping with a rate-determining step in which hydride
transfer occurs.[17,18]
In order to assess the stereochemistry of the hydride
transfer, we heated [D2]-12b at 1708C in a mixture of toluene
and water[19] to afford [D1]-13b in 83% yield with a 3:1 ratio
of diastereomers [Eq. (4)].
In an effort to trap the putative sulfoximine-stabilized
carbocation formed in this process, we used ethylene glycol as
the polar cosolvent. Heating a solution of 12e in a 1:1 mixture
of toluene/ethylene glycol produced the expected sulfoximine
2
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!