formation provides an alternative to Lewis acid mediated
ionization and has been used in the synthesis of complex
structures that contain sensitive groups such as acetals and
epoxides.5 We have been engaged in developing oxidative
carbonÀhydrogen bond cleavage reactions to generate
stabilized carbocations under nonacidic conditions.6 These
processes proceed through reactions of allylic, benzylic,
and vinylic ethers, amides, and sulfides with 2,3-dichloro-
5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ). In this manuscript
we report that cyclopropane-substituted R,β-unsaturated
oxocarbenium ions can be prepared through allylic ether
oxidation and that the resulting intermediates can be
trapped to form tetrahydropyrans with no evidence of ring
opening, as shown in the generic conversion of 1 to 2 to 3
in Scheme 2. This process is used as the key step in a
convergent synthesis of the macrodiolide clavosolide A.
not quantitative, the remainder of the mass can be attrib-
uted to nonspecific decomposition pathways rather than
cyclopropane ring opening. These results provided a sui-
table precedent for the application of the protocol in a
more complex setting.
Scheme 3. Oxidative Cyclization of Cyclopropane-Containing
Substrates
Scheme 2. Oxidative Synthesis of Cyclopropane-Containing
Tetrahydropyrans
We chose clavosolide A, 9 (Scheme 4), as a target to
highlight the utility of the protocol. The Faulkner group
isolated clavosolide A from a sponge off the coast of the
Phillipines,8 but limited quantities have precluded a thor-
ough examination of its biological activity. A revision of
the stereostructure was proposed by Willis9 and was con-
firmed through a total synthesis from the Lee group.10
Several total and formal syntheses of clavosolide A have
subsequently been reported,11 with the majority employing
a late stage introduction of the cyclopropyl group to avoid
the potential for ring opening. Smith and co-workers
introduced the cyclopropane at an early stage but noted
the Lewis acid sensitivity of the group and cautioned against
prolonged reaction times and the use of strong acids.11b Our
objective was to demonstrate that the oxidative cyclization
conditions allow the cyclopropane unit of clavosolide A
to be introduced at an early stage in the synthesis, thereby
providing an attractive strategy for a convergent synthesis.
We envisioned 9 as arising from cyclopropyl tetrahydropyr-
an 10, which can be accessed from ether 11 through an
oxidative cyclization. This ether can arise from the union of
subunits 12 and 13.
The initial demonstrations of this transformation are
shown in Scheme 3. Vinylsilanes were selectedassubstrates
because they can be converted stereoselectively to second-
ary alcohols through a short sequence6d and they are
readily accessed with high geometric control from alkynes
through hydrosilylation reactions7 with ruthenium or
platinum catalysts. Enol acetates were used as the nucleo-
philes because they are oxidatively stable enolate surro-
gates. Exposing Z-vinylsilane 4 to DDQ at 45 °C provided
oxocarbenium ion 5 en route to the formation of tetrahy-
dropyrone 6. While many DDQ-mediated oxocarbenium
ion formations proceed at ambient temperature or below,
the vinylsilanes generally require higher temperatures be-
cause steric bulk interferes with their association with
the oxidant.6d The oxidation of (E)-isomer 7 proceeds with
similar efficiency to form 8. These reactions provided
inseparable diastereomeric mixtures of products, showing
that the cyclopropyl group does not promote remote
stereoinduction. While the yields of these reactions were
The synthesis of the cyclopropane-containing subunit
(Scheme 5) employed Feringa’s elegant asymmetric 1,4-
addition protocol12 as the key step. Conjugate addition
of MeMgBr to chloro enone 14, prepared in one step from
(5) (a) Wan, S.; Gunaydin, H.; Houk, K. N.; Floreancig, P. E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7915. (b) Green, M. E.; Rech, J. C.; Floreancig,
P. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7317. (c) Clausen, D. J.; Wan, S.;
Floreancig, P. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5178.
(6) (a) Tu, W.; Liu, L.; Floreancig, P. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 4184. (b) Tu, W.; Floreancig, P. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
4567. (c) Liu, L.; Floreancig, P. E. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3152. (d) Liu, L.;
Floreancig, P. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3069. (e) Liu, L.;
Floreancig, P. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5894. (f) Brizgys, G. J.;
Jung, H. H.; Floreancig, P. E. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 438. (g) Cui, Y.;
Floreancig, P. E. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1720. (h) Han, X.; Floreancig, P. E.
Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3808. (i) Clausen, D. J.; Floreancig, P. E. J. Org.
Chem. 2012, 77, 6574.
(8) Rao, M. R.; Faulkner, D. J. J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 386.
(9) Barry, C. S.; Bushby, N.; Charmant, J. P. H.; Elsworth, J. D.;
Harding, J. R.; Willis, C. L. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5097.
(10) Son, J. B.; Kim, S. N.; Kim, N. Y.; Lee, D. H. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
661.
(11) (a) Barry, C. S.; Elsworth, J. D.; Seden, P. T.; Bushby, N.;
Harding, J. R.; Alder, R. W.; Willis, C. L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3319. (b)
Smith, A. B., III; Simov, V. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3315. (c) Chakraborty,
T. K.; Reddy, V. R.; Gajula, P. K Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 5162. (d)
Carrick, J. D.; Jennings, M. P. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 769.
ꢀ
(12) den Hartog, T.; Rudolph, A.; Macia, B.; Minnaard, A. J.;
(7) Lim, D. S. W.; Anderson, E. A. Synthesis 2012, 44, 983.
Feringa, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 14349.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 21, 2012
5615