S. Luaces et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 721-722 (2012) 23e30
29
2BH þ 5.6 [þ5.30, þ0.07], 1BH þ 2.9 [þ3.22], 1BH ꢀ0.4 [þ3.98],
1BH ꢀ2.0 [þ3.00], 3BH ꢀ10.4 [þ2.48] together with 1BH ꢀ37.0
optimized geometries, and computed 11B shielding values were
related to chemical shifts by comparison with the computed value
[þ1.47]. 1He{11B} NMR (300 MHz; CD2Cl2; 298 K):
d
7.3 to 7.9
for B2H6, which was taken to be
d(
11B) þ 16.6 ppm relative to the
(aromatic region), þ1.58 [d, 2J(31Pe1H) ¼ 9 Hz, IrePMe3], þ1.50 [d,
BF3(OEt2) ¼ 0.0 ppm standard. Computed carbonyl frequencies are
2J(31Pe1H) ¼ 10 Hz, IrePMe3], þ0.90 [d, 2J(31Pe1H) ¼ 9 Hz,
given with a 0.9613 scaling factor [72].
RhePMe3]. 31Pe{1H} NMR (161 MHz; CDCl3; 243 K):
d
þ43.6 [d,
2
1J(103Rhe31P) ¼ 189 Hz, J(31P(4)e31P(3)) ¼ 44 Hz, P(4)Ph3], ꢀ28.1
Acknowledgements
[d, P(3)Me3], ꢀ27.7 [d,
J
2 31P(1)e31P(2)) ¼ 25 Hz, PMe3], ꢀ45.0 [d,
2J(31P(1)e31P(2)) ¼ 25 Hz, PMe3].
We acknowledge the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innova-
tion (CTQ2009-10132, CONSOLIDER INGENIO, CSD2009-00050,
MULTICAT and CSD2006-0015, Crystallization Factory) and the
Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (grant no. P207/11/1577) for
support of this work. J.B. thanks the Spanish Ministry of Science
Innovation for sabbatical funding (SAB2009-0191) and S.L. thanks
the “ Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología” for a pre-doctoral
scholarship.
4.6. X-ray crystallography
X-ray diffraction data were collected at low temperature
(100(2) K) on an automatic Bruker Kappa APEX DUO CCD area
detector diffractometer equipped with graphite-monochromated
MoKa
radiation (
l
¼ 0.71073 Å) using narrow frames (0.3ꢁ in
u)
for 6; and on a the BM16 CRG beamline at the ESRF in the case of 5
and 8. In all cases, single crystals were mounted on micro-mount
supports and were covered with a protective perfluoropolyether.
The structures were solved and refined using the programmes
SADABS and SHELXL-97 respectively [67,68]. The programs ORTEP-
3 [69] and PLATON [70] were used to prepare Figs. 1and 3. Collec-
tion and refinement data are shown in Table 3.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary material associated with this article can
References
4.7. Calculations
[1] M.A. Fox, Polyhedral Carboranes, in: R.H. Crabtree, D.M.P. Mingos (Eds.),
Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry III, Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, 2007, pp.
49e112.
[2] T. Onak, Polyhedral Organoboranes, in: G. Wilkinson, F.G.A. Stone, E.W. Abel
(Eds.), Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry, Pergamon Press, Ltd.,
Oxford, 1982, pp. 411e457.
[3] T. Onak, Polyhedral Carboranes, in: E.W. Abel, F.G.A. Stone, G. Wilkinson
(Eds.), Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry, Elsevier Science Ltd.,
Oxford, 1995, pp. 217e255.
[4] R.N. Grimes, Metallacarboranes and Metallaboranes, in: G. Wilkinson,
F.G.A. Stone, E.W. Abel (Eds.), Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry,
Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford, 1982, pp. 459e542.
All calculations were performed using the Gaussian 03 package
[71]. Structures were initially optimized using standard methods
with the STO-3G* basis-sets for C, B, P, S, and H with the LANL2DZ
basis-set for the metal atom. The final optimizations, including
frequency analyses to confirm the true minima, together with GIAO
nuclear-shielding calculations, were performed using B3LYP
methodology, with the 6-31G* and LANL2DZ basis-sets. The GIAO
nuclear shielding calculations were performed on the final
[5] R.N. Grimes, Transition Metal Metallacarboranes, in: E.W. Abel, F.G.A. Stone,
G. Wilkinson (Eds.), Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II, Pergamon,
Oxford, 1995, pp. 373e430.
Table 3
[6] N.S. Hosmane, J.A. Maguire, Metallacarboranes of d- and f-Block Metals, in:
R.H. Crabtree, D.M.P. Mingos (Eds.), Comprehensive Organometallic Chem-
istry, Elsevier, Oxford, 2007, pp. 175e264.
[7] Z. Xie, Coord. Chem. Rev. 231 (2002) 23e46.
[8] Z. Xie, Acct. Chem. Res. 36 (2003) 1e9.
[9] Z. Qiu, S. Ren, Z. Xie, Acct. Chem. Res. 44 (2011) 299e309.
[10] J. Zhang, Z. Xie, Chem.-Asian J. 5 (2010) 1742e1757.
[11] R. Satapathy, B.P. Dash, J.A. Maguire, N.S. Hosmane, Collect. Czech. Chem.
Commun. 75 (2010) 995e1022.
Crystallographic and structure refinement data.
Compound
Chemical formula
Formula mass
Crystal system
a/Å
5
6
8
C7H29B8IrOP2S C37H41B8OP2RhS C28H51B9IrOP4RhS
501.98
785.09
952.06
Monoclinic
12.8736(10)
16.7758(13)
26.890(2)
90.00
96.4460(10)
90.00
5770.7(8)
100(2)
Monoclinic
11.0766(5)
21.6858(11)
15.3462(8)
90.00
93.0830(10)
90.00
3680.9(3)
100(2)
Monoclinic
12.1060(10)
25.7300(10)
12.3430(10)
90.00
95.659(2)
90.00
3826.0(5)
100(2)
P21/n
4
Synchrotron
4.391
b/Å
c/Å
[12] X.-L. Meng, Ziran Kexueban 36 (2010) 101e104.
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
/
a
/
[13] A.R. Kudinov, D.A. Loginov, Russ. Chem. Bull. 58 (2010) 600e603.
[14] W. Kaim, N.S. Hosmane, J. Chem. Sci. 122 (2010) 7e18 (Bangalore, India).
[15] N.S. Hosmane, Y. Zhu, J.A. Maguire, W. Kaim, M. Takagaki, J. Organomet. Chem.
694 (2009) 1690e1697.
b
/
g
Unit cell volume/Å3
Temperature/K
Space group
Z
[16] P.A. Jelliss, Inorg. Chem. 29 (2008) 1e25.
P21/c
12
Cc
4
[17] L.T. Todd, Heterocarboranes, in: G. Wilkinson, F.G.A. Stone, E.W. Abel (Eds.),
Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry, Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford,
1982, pp. 534e553.
Radiation type
MoKa
MoK
a
Absorption coefficient, 7.202
m
0.639
21,879
8584
[18] S. Hermánek, Chem. Rev. 92 (1992) 325.
/mmꢀ1
[19] L.T. Todd, Main-Group Heteroboranes, in: E.W. Abel, F.G.A. Stone,
G. Wilkinson (Eds.), Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II, Elsevier
Science, Oxford, 1995, pp. 257e273.
[20] L. Wesemann, s- p-Block Heteroboranes and Carboranes, in: D.M.P. Mingos,
R.H. Crabtree (Eds.), Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry, Elsevier,
Oxford, 2007, pp. 113e131.
No. of reflections
measured
No. of independent
reflections
40,161
13259
53,605
8503
Rint
0.0499
0.0363
0.0172
0.0204
0.0795
0.0433
[21] S. Kupper, P.J. Carroll, L.G. Sneddon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 4914e4915.
[22] S.O. Kang, L.G. Sneddon, Inorg. Chem. 27 (1988) 3769e3772.
[23] K.J. Donaghy, P.J. Carroll, L.G. Sneddon, Inorg. Chem. 36 (1997) 547e553.
[24] T. Jelinek, C.A. Kilner, S.A. Barrett, M. Thornton-Pett, J.D. Kennedy, Chem.
Commun. (1999) 1905e1906.
Final R1 values
(I > 2
Final wR(F2) values
(I > 2 (I))
s(I))
0.0758
0.0698
0.0841
0.935
0.0532
0.0207
0.0535
1.029
0.1237
0.0446
0.1256
1.098
s
ꢀ
Final R1 values
(all data)
[25] T. Jelinek, J.D. Kennedy, B. Stíbr, M. Thorntonpett, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 33
(1994) 1599e1601.
Final wR(F2) values
(all data)
[26] M. Bown, X.L.R. Fontaine, N.N. Greenwood, J.D. Kennedy, Z. Anorg, Allg. Chem.
602 (1991) 17e29.
[27] R.W. Rudolph, W.R. Pretzer, Inorg. Synth. 22 (1983) 226e231.
Goodness of fit
on F2
ꢀ
[28] K. Base, M.G.H. Wallbridge, X.L.R. Fontaine, N.N. Greenwood, J.H. Jones,
ꢀ
J.D. Kennedy, B. Stíbr, Polyhedron 8 (1989) 2089e2090.