1328
Published on the web October 13, 2012
Addition-versus-Oxygenative Cleavage: Two Contradictory Reactivities in the Reaction
of N-Benzyl-4-pentenylamine Catalyzed by Colloidal Nanogold under Aerobic Conditions
Hiroaki Kitahara and Hidehiro Sakurai*
Research Center for Molecular Scale Nanoscience, Institute for Molecular Science,
Myodaiji, Okazaki, Aichi 444-8787
(Received May 14, 2012; CL-120611; E-mail: hsakurai@ims.ac.jp)
Previous work
Gold nanoclusters stabilized by a hydrophilic polymer,
poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone), (Au:PVP) catalyze two contra-
dictory types of the reaction from N-benzyl secondary amines
with unactivated alkenes in EtOH under basic conditions. One is
an intramolecular addition reaction that also starts from N-
sulfonylamine or primary amine as previously reported. The
other involves the oxygenative cleavage of alkene, giving the
corresponding £-lactam compound.
R
N
NHR
Ph
5 atom% Au:PVP
CH3
ð1Þ
air, 50 °C
Ph
Ph
Ph
1
2
300 mol% Cs2CO3, EtOH, 1 h, >99%
R=Ts
R=H 1000 mol% HCO2H, 500 mol% NH3
pH=4.01 buffer/EtOH, 4 h, 94%
This work
Bn
N
5 atom% Au:PVP
CH3
Our previous reports have demonstrated that colloidal
nanogold protected by a hydrophilic polymer, poly(N-vinyl-2-
pyrrolidone), (Au:PVP)1 exhibits not only an aerobic oxidation
activity but also a formal Lewis acid activity and promotes
intramolecular heterocyclization of £-hydroxyalkenes and £-
aminoalkenes.2 The choice of the sacrificial reductant as well
as the basicity of the reaction conditions are important for
successfully promoting the formal Lewis acid reaction, because
the redox reaction between O2 and the solvent occurs after
the main addition reaction. For example, in the reaction of
toluenesulfonamides, EtOH acts as a suitable sacrificial reduc-
tant under strong basic conditions,3 whereas formic acid needs to
be added as a reductant under slightly acidic conditions starting
from primary amines as reactants (eq 1).4
Herein, we report that two contradictory reactions proceeded
from N-benzyl secondary amines with 4-pentenyl group cata-
lyzed by Au:PVP in EtOH under basic conditions (eq 2). One is
hydroamination, same as in the case of the previous examples,
which occurred in the presence of Cs2CO3 as a base with up to
45% yield. The other is the formation of a £-lactam compound
that proceeded in the presence of CsOAc as a base with up to
46% yield (eq 2). The latter reaction might involve the oxidative
cleavage of carbon-carbon multiple bond, which has been
observed under ozonolysis conditions but is unknown under the
usual aerobic oxidation conditions in the presence of any type of
catalyst, including gold.
Table 1 shows the representative results for screening the
reaction conditions. First, the reaction was carried out under the
same conditions as hydroalkoxylation.5 Treatment of N-benzyl-
amine 1 with 10 atom % Au:PVP in the presence of 200 mol %
DBU as a base at 50 °C for 16 h in DMF/H2O mixed solvent
afforded N-benzylpyrrolidine 2 and N-benzylpyrrolidinone 3 in
26% and 17% yields, respectively (Entry 1). When the solvent
was changed to EtOH, which was a suitable hydrogen donor in
the case of toluenesulfonamides, the yields of both 2 and 3 were
slightly decreased (Entry 2). When the base was changed to
K2CO3 or Cs2CO3, the yield of 2 increased to 35% or 45%,
respectively. Note that 5 atom % of Au:PVP was sufficient to
complete the reaction and the reaction time of the reaction with
Cs2CO3 was slightly shorter (Entries 3 and 4).6
Ph
300 mol% Cs2CO3
EtOH, air
Ph
2
NHBn
50 °C, 10.5 h, 45%
ð2Þ
Ph
Ph
Bn
N
5 atom% Au:PVP
O
1
Ph
300 mol% CsOAc
EtOH, air
50 °C, 35 h, 46%
Ph
3
Indeed, the reaction time was markedly shortened when a more
stronger base such as CsOH was used (Entry 5). However, the
yield of 2 slightly decreased to 42%. On the other hand, the
oxidation reaction proceeded even in the absence of a base,
giving 12% of 2 and 32% of 3 after 26 h (Entry 6). Since the
yield of 3 increased under neutral conditions, next, we surveyed
additives ranging from weak base to weak acid. We found that
weak basic conditions such as those obtained by the addition of
Table 1. Optimization of the reaction conditions
Bn
Bn
NHBn
N
N
5 atom% Au:PVP
O
CH3
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
300 mol% base
solvent, 50 °C
Ph
2
Ph
3
1
Yield/%
Entry
Base
DBU
Solvent
Time/h
2
3
1a,b
2b
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10c
11c
DMF/H2O
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
BuOH
EtOH
EtOH
16
12
12
10.5
3
26
35
17.5
12
23
23
26
22
35
45
42
12
14
17
16
17
7
13
7
16
32
46
31
21
DBU
K2CO3
Cs2CO3
CsOH
®
CsOAc
NaOAc
CsOAc
Cs2CO3
CsOAc
no reaction
no reaction
a10 atom % Au:PVP was used. b200 mol % DBU was used.
cWithout Au:PVP catalyst.
Chem. Lett. 2012, 41, 1328-1330
© 2012 The Chemical Society of Japan