Scheme 1. Alkoxyl Radical β-Fragmentation of 2,3-Dideoxy-3-phosphorylhexopyranosesa
a ARF = alkoxyl radical β-fragmentation reaction; Z = Ph (phosphine oxides), Z = OEt (phosphonates).
with chlorophosphate using iodine as electrophile.6 Studies
on the chemical reactivity of these compounds have been
largely limited to diethyl 2-iodoethylphosphonate.5a,c,7
Previous work from our laboratory described the car-
bohydrate anomeric alkoxyl radical β-fragmentation reac-
tion (ARF) by treatment of the free anomeric alcohol with
hypervalent iodine in the presence of iodine.8 Exploiting
these sugar transformations, we set out to develop a new
methodology for elaboration of chiral vinylphosphine
oxide and vinylphosphonate derivatives of generalized
structure VII (Scheme 1). Regioselective introduction of
the CÀP bond into the carbohydrate skeleton was accom-
plished using two different protocols. 3-Phosphinyl deri-
vatives III (Z = Ph) were prepared from glycals I via an
anomalousFerrierreaction while a Michael addition tothe
readily available unsaturated lactones II was used for the
synthesis of 3-phosphonylated sugars IV (Z = OEt).
Subsequently, either the acid-catalyzed hydration of III
(Z = Ph) or the reduction of IV (Z = OEt) afforded the
required γ-hydroxyphosphorus compounds V which were
then submitted to the ARF reaction to give β-iodophosphorus
compounds VI. Dehydroiodination of VI provided the desired
vinylorganophosphorus VII.
In pursuance of this goal we decided to prepare first
3-phosphinylated-glycals 1, 5, and 9 by reaction of the
corresponding perbenzylated D-glucal, D-galactal, and
D-lactal, respectively, with diphenylphosphenium cation
using a previously reported procedure developed by
Yamamoto et al. for perbenzylated D-glucal (Table 1).9
The extension of this methodology to perbenzylated
D-galactal afforded 5 as a sole stereoisomer. The reaction
was also expanded to disaccharide D-lactal, but a mixture
of the four Ferrier isomers, by P-nucleophilic attack at C-1
and C-3, were obtained as described in the Supporting
Information. For the present study, only the major
3R-isomer 9 (45%) has been used.
Hydration of these glycals by a modification of the
procedure of Falck et al.10 with catalytic amounts of
Ph3P HBr in refluxing THF/H2O gave hexopyranose
3
compounds 2, 6, and 10 in high yields. The ARF reactions
were performed under the conditions stated in Table 1,
with (diacetoxyiodo)benzene (DIB) and iodine in CH2Cl2.
The ARF proceeded smoothly and the β-iodo phosphine
oxides 3, 7, and 11 were obtained in good yields. In the
fragmentation of 10, the major product 11 (67%) was
accompanied by a side product identified as lactone 33S
(15%, see the Supporting Information). The dehydroiodi-
nation of the β-iodo phosphine oxides was effectively
accomplished with DBU in benzene to afford vinylpho-
sphine oxides 4, 8, and 12 in high yields.
In the iodide elimination of 11, partial hydrolysis of the
formate group was observed, and besides vinylphosphine
oxide 12, a small amount of the corresponding alcohol 34S
(13%, see the Supporting Information) was obtained, the
global yield of the vinylphosphine oxide reaching 96%.
Preliminary attempts to prepare 3-phosphonylated
sugar of general structure III (Z = OEt) using a modified
Yamamoto protocol by reaction of perbenzylated D-glucal
with (EtO)2PCl/AlCl3 proved to be unsuccessful; therefore,
an alternative route was sought. The phospha-Michael
addition of triethyl phosphite to readily accessible pent-
2-enono-1,4-lactones11 and hex-2-enono-1,5-lactones12 under
the conditions described by Kofoed and Pedersen,13 using
phenol as protonating agent, afforded the 3-phosphonylated
γ- and δ-lactones 13, 17, and 21. The reaction proceeded with
excellent regio- and diastereoselectivity for 13 and 21, but as
should be expected for a sterically less demanding substrate,
the glucose derivative 17 was obtained as an inseparable
(10) (a) Bolitt, V.; Mioskowski, C.; Lee, S.-G.; Falck, J. R. J. Org.
Chem. 1990, 55, 5812–5813. (b) Koviach, J. L.; Chappell, M. D.;
Halcomb, R. L. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 2318–2326.
(7) Takahashi, H.; Inagaki, S.; Yoshii, N.; Gao, F.; Nishihara, Y.;
Takagi, K. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 2794–2797.
~
(11) Camps, P.; Cardellach, J.; Font, J.; Ortuno, R. M.; Ponsati, O.
ꢀ
(8) (a) de Armas, P.; Francisco, C. G.; Suarez, E. Angew. Chem., Int.
ꢀ
Tetrahedron 1982, 38, 2395–2402.
(12) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Reddy, Ch. S. Tetrahedron Lett.
2004, 45, 4583–4586.
Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 772–774. (b) de Armas, P.; Francisco, C. G.; Suarez,
ꢀ
E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8865–8866. (c) Gonzalez, C. C.;
ꢀ
ꢀ
Kennedy, A. R.; Leon, E. I.; Riesco-Fagundo, C.; Suarez, E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2326–2328.
(13) For a review on phospha-Michael addition, see: (a) Enders, D.;
Saint-Dizier, A.; Lannou, M.-I.; Lenzen, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 29–
49. (b) Kofoed, T.; Pedersen, E. B. Nucleosides, Nucleotides and Nucleic
Acids 1995, 14, 345–347.
(9) Takano, A.; Fukuhara, H.; Ohno, T.; Kutsuma, M.; Fujimoto,
T.; Shirai, H.; Iriye, R.; Kakehi, A.; Yamamoto, I. J. Carbohydr. Chem.
2003, 22, 443–457.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX