the fact that the chirality can be readily introduced at a
molecular level, there is a growing interest in developing
molecular networks that functionally mimic the proper-
ties of inorganic zeolites.7 A prudent approach to the
development of porous organic materials constitutes
molecular tectonics,6e an art of building solids based on
molecules with predesigned topologies and properties,
which hinges on two key aspects, viz., the geometrical
features of the building block and location as well as
choice of functional groups that lend themselves to
reliable, repetitive, and robust association motifs/syn-
thons. We have recently conceived of a unique four-
connecting three-dimensional module (1, Scheme 1) based
on bimesityl core for supramolecular self-assembly, and
demonstrated its utility in the self-assembly of three-
dimensional discrete8a as well as polymeric coordination
architectures.8b We reasoned that installation of func-
tional groups such as hydroxyl and carboxyl at the para
positions of 3,3′,5,5′-tetraphenylbimesityl (2 and 3, Scheme
1) could yield hydrogen-bonded networks with voids for
guest inclusion.9 Indeed, it was readily surmised that
linear linkage, for example, of the tetraacid 3 via the
dimeric motif of the carboxyl group, should afford the
polymeric (10,3)-b net10 as shown in Figure 1, in which
the channels run in a perpendicular direction. We have
thus synthesized the unique three-dimensional modules
2-5 based on bimesityl core and explored their self-
assembly based on O-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bonding. A further
advantage with bimesityl core unit could be gauged from
the feasibility for facile structural expansion as can be
seen, for example, with the expanded derivatives 4 and
5 (Scheme 1). Herein, we report the facile synthesis of
structurally novel tetrarylbimesityls 2-5 based on a
4-fold Suzuki coupling protocol and novel self-assembly
Three-Dimensional Four-Connecting
Organic Scaffolds with a Twist: Synthesis
and Self-Assembly
Jarugu Narasimha Moorthy,*,†
Ramalingam Natarajan,† and Paloth Venugopalan‡
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology,
Kanpur - 208 016, India, and Department of Chemistry,
Panjab University, Chandigarh - 160 014, India
Received June 14, 2005
We have synthesized a novel class of four-connecting three-
dimensional molecular scaffolds 2-5 based on biaryls for
supramolecular self-assembly. The X-ray crystal structure
analysis of 2 with ethanol reveals a novel O-H‚‚‚O hydrogen-
bonded helical self-assembly in three dimensions leading to
the generation of channels in the crystal lattice. The tet-
raacid 3 also forms analogous channels in which the solvent
molecules, viz., DMSO and H2O, reside. The structures of 2
and 3 amply illustrate the potential of three-dimensional
four-connecting biaryls in developing functional mimics of
inorganic zeolites.
(6) Our thorough literature search has revealed only a limited
number of three-dimensional molecular systems, which have been
exploited for crystal packing in three dimensions; see: (a) Ermer, O.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3747. (b) Boldog, I.; Rusanov, E. B.; Sieler,
J.; Blaurock, S.; Domasevitch, K. V. Chem. Commun. 2003, 740. (c)
Holy, P.; Zavada, J.; Cisarova, I.; Podlaha, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1999, 38, 381. (d) Holy, P.; Zavada, J.; Cisarova, I.; Podlaha, J.
Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2001, 12, 3035. (e) Wang, X.; Simard, M.;
Wuest, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 12119. (f) Reddy, D. S.;
Craig, D. C.; Desiraju, G. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4090. (g)
Brunet, P.; Simard, M.; Wuest, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
2737. (h) Reddy, D. S.; Dewa, T.; Endo, K.; Aoyama, Y. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4266. (i) Thaimattam, R.; Sharma, C. V. K.;
Clearfield, A.; Desiraju, G. R. Cryst. Growth Des. 2001, 1, 103. (j)
Fournier, J.-H.; Maris, T.; Wuest, J. D.; Guo, W.; Galoppini, E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1002. (k) Fournier, J.-H.; Maris, T.; Simard,
M.; Wuest, J. D. Cryst. Growth Des. 2003, 3, 535. (l) Boldog, I.;
Rusanov, E. B.; Chernega, A. N.; Sieler, J.; Domasevitch, K. V. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3435. (m) Sauriat-Dorizon, H.; Maris, T.;
Wuest, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 240. (n) Laliberte, D.; Maris, T.;
Wuest, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1776.
(7) (a) Janiak, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1431. (b)
Seo, J. S.; Whang, D.; Lee, H.; Jun, S. I.; Oh, J.; Jeon, Y. J.; Kim, K.
Nature 2000, 404, 982. (c) Wu, C.-D.; Hu, A.; Zhang, L.; Lin, W. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8940. (d) Fang, Q.; Zhu, G.; Xue, M.; Sun,
J.; Wei, Y.; Qiu, S.; Xu, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3845.
(8) (a) Natarajan, R.; Savitha, G.; Moorthy, J. N. Cryst. Growth Des.
2005, 5, 69. (b) Natarajan, R.; Savitha, G.; Dominiak, P.; Wozniak,
K.; Moorthy, J. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2115.
(9) For remarkably porous networks based on anthracene-bisresor-
cinol by Aoyama and co-workers, see: (a) Endo, K.; Ezuhara, T.;
Koyanagi, M.; Masuda, H.; Aoyama, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
499. (b) Dewa, K.; Endo, K.; Aoyama, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
8933.
(10) Wells, A. F. Three-Dimensionanl Nets and Polyhedra; Wiley-
Interscience: New York, 1977.
Control of molecular organization is pivotal for the
development of organic solids with predefined functional
properties.1 Whereas the recent literature in supramo-
lecular chemistry is replete with examples of control of
molecular organization in one and two dimensions,2,3 that
in the third dimension continues to be a challenging
proposition;4 one of the reasons for this may be traced to
a limited number of three-dimensional molecular scaf-
folds that could be exploited for self-assembly in three
dimensions by installing functional groups responsible
for reliable synthons5 at strategic locations.6 Control of
molecular ordering in three dimensions is particularly
relevant to developing porous organic solids. In view of
† Indian Institute of Technology.
‡ Panjab University.
(1) (a) Desiraju, G. R. Crystal Engineering. The Design of Organic
Solids; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989. (b) Langley, P.
J.; Hulliger, J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28, 279. (b) Hollingsworth, M.
D. Science 2002, 295, 2410.
(2) (a) MacDonald, J. C.; Whitesides, G. M. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94,
2383. (b) Lawrence, D. S.; Jiang, T.; Levett, M. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95,
2229.
(3) (a) Melendez, R. E.; Hamilton, A. D. Top. Curr. Chem. 1998, 198,
97. (b) Tanaka, T.; Tasaki, T.; Aoyama, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 12453.
(4) (a) Gong, B.; Zheng, C.; Skrzypczak-Jankun, E.; Yan, Y.; Zhang,
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11194. (b) Sharma, C. V. K.; Clearfield,
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4394. (c) Malek, N.; Maris, T.; Perron,
M.-E.; Wuest, J. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4021.
(5) Desiraju, G. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2311.
10.1021/jo051205z CCC: $30.25 © 2005 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/21/2005
8568
J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8568-8571