Z. Iqbal et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 488–491
491
highly homologous enzyme to ALR2, partially purified from kid-
neys of calf. The results are tabulated in Table 3 as IC50 values. Val-
proic acid was used as positive control to validate the ALR1 assay.
In this assay, the most potent compound against ALR2 was
found to be 2a with a methyl group attached at position 4 of the
benzene ring. Compounds 2f and 2g also revealed excellent inhib-
itory activity, however, compound 2f having a naphthyl group as
an aryl moiety is more potent than 2g where naphthyl group is re-
placed with anthraquinyl group. The activity decreases little bit,
when halogen group is attached with the aryl moiety. The IC50
value of compound 2b with a chlorine atom attaches to the para-
exhibited excellent hypoglycemic activity and were more potent
than the standard drug glibenclamide, a well known 2nd genera-
tion antidiabetic drug. Compound 2a was also the most potent
inhibitor of ALR2. Rest of the compounds also revealed very good
activity against ALR2. The activity against ALR1 was synthesized
compounds also exhibit selectivity towards ALR2 over ALR1.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
11.039. These data include MOL files and InChiKeys of the most
important compounds described in this article.
position of aryl group was found to be 5.59
lM, while it decreased
further to 15.4 M when bromine atom is present as a substituent
l
at the same position in compound 2c. The activity remains almost
the same when bromine was replaced with NO2 group, hence com-
References and notes
pound 2d showed IC50 value of 13.1
was used as a substituent again a good activity with IC50 value of
4.4 M was observed. In the next step, we determined the enzyme
lM. When a methoxy group
1. Yamagishi, S.; Imaizumi, T. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005, 11, 2279.
2. Gabbay, K. H. N. Engl. J. Med. 1973, 288, 831.
3. Malone, J. I.; Knox, G.; Benford, S.; Tedesco, T. A. Diabetes 1980, 29, 861.
4. Travis, S. F.; Morrison, A. D.; Clements, R. S.; Winegrad, J. A. I.; Oski, F. A. Br. J.
Haematol. 1974, 27, 597.
l
kinetics using the most active compound (2a) in the series. A de-
crease in Km and Vmax values was observed in presence of inhibitor
2a, suggesting an uncompetitive type inhibition mechanism. This
means that in hyperglycaemic condition where the glucose level
is high, the inhibitory efficiency of the drug would not decrease.
The synthesized compounds were also evaluated for ALR1 inhibi-
tion. Compounds 2d and 2e showed a more potent activity than
5. Wick, A. N.; Drury, D. R. Am. J. Physiol. 1951, 166, 421.
6. Oka, M.; Kato, N. J. Enzyme Inhib. 2001, 16, 465.
7. Dugmore, W. N.; Tun, K. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1980, 64, 689.
8. Ovalle, F.; Ovalle-Berumen, J. F. South. Med. J. 2002, 95, 1188.
9. Imran, M.; Ilyas, B.; Deepanjali; Khan, S. A. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2007, 66, 99.
10. Granberry, M. C.; Hawkins, J. B.; Franks, A. M. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2007,
64, 931.
standard with an IC50 value of 44.8
lM and 42.2 lM, respectively,
11. Chou, C. C.; Chem, W. L.; Kao, T. W.; Chang, Y. W.; Loh, C. H.; Wang, C. C. Clin.
Ther. 1904, 2011, 33.
12. Bergeron, R. J. Chem. Rev. 1984, 84, 587.
13. Hanessian, S.; Johnstone, S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5896.
14. Whittaker, M.; Floyd, C. D.; Brown, P.; Gearing, A. J. H. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99,
2735.
15. Kolasa, T.; Stewart, A. O.; Brooks, C. D. W Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 729.
16. Iqbal, Z.; Akhtar, T.; Hendsbee, A. D.; Masuda, J. d.; Hameed, S. Monatsh. Chem.
2012, 143, 497.
17. Kashif, M. K.; Ahmad, I.; Hameed, S. ARKIVOC 2008, xvi, 311.
18. Brimelow, H. C.; Carrington, H. C.; Vasey, C. H.; Waring, W. S. J. Chem. Soc.
(resumed) 1962, 2789.
19. Gauthier, T. J.; Yokum, T. S.; Morales, G. A.; McLaughlin, M. L.; Liu, Y. H.;
Fronczek, F. R. Acta Crystallogr. C 1997, 53, 1659.
20. Zheng, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhai, J.; Chen, Y.; Luo, H.; Hu, X. FEBS Lett. 2012, 586, 55.
21. Stefek, M.; Snirc, V.; Djoubissie, P. O.; Majekova, M.; Demopoulos, V.; Rackova,
L.; Bezakova, Z.; Karasu, C.; Carbone, V.; El-Kabbani, O. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008,
16, 4908.
22. Chatzopoulo, M.; Mamadou, E.; Juskova, M.; Koukoulitsa, C.; Nicolaou, L.;
Stefek, M.; Demopoulos, V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 1426.
as compared to 57.4 M of the standard. The activity decreases
l
when a halogen atom is attached with the aryl group of arylsulfo-
nylspiroimidazolidinediones. Methoxy and nitro group attachment
caused the compound to become potent against ALR1.
It may be observed from the comparison of ALR1 and ALR2
activities that most of the synthesized compounds show selectivity
against ALR2 as compared to ALR1. Compound 2g is around 150-
fold more potent inhibitor of ALR2 than ALR1. Similarly, compound
2a is almost 100-fold and compound 2b about 10-fold more potent
towards ALR2 than ALR1. This selectivity towards ALR2 over ALR1
is desirable to minimize toxicity and side effects.
In conclusion, the synthesis of spirobicycloimidazolidine-2,4-
diones was successfully accomplished. The synthesized com-
pounds were evaluated for in vivo hypoglycemic activity on male
albino rats and inhibition of ALR1 and ALR2 extracted from the kid-
ney and eye of the calf, respectively. Compounds 2a, 2b and 2g