1772
C. S. Kim et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 1771–1775
27
21
20
26
O
25
18
12
23
22
11
9
24
OH
26
21
OH18
HO
24
19
17
13
O
22
23
20
15
(R)
1
4
16
HO
O
2
3
OR
O 1'''
OH
HO
25
27
14
15
O
10
8
7
HO
OH
O
11
17
12
5
19
13
14
1
OH
16
HO
6
2
H
9
O1'
10
8
7
3
5
O
4
1''
6
O
HO
HO
OH
1: R = H
2: R = β -D-Glc
3
O
HO
HO
O
HO
O
O
O
O
O
OH
O
O
RO
HO
HO
OH HO
H
OH
O
HO
HO
OH
4: R = H
5: R =α -L-Rha
Figure 1. Structures of 1–5 from the leaves of H. longipes.
oxygenated methine [dH 4.34 (1H, dt, J = 7.0, 4.0 Hz), 4.04 (1H, t,
J = 6.0 Hz) and 3.35 (1H, m)], one oxygenated methylene [dH 3.44
(1H, dd, J = 5.5, 10.5 Hz), and 3.34 (1H, m)], and one olefinic proton
[dH 5.71 (1H, s)] signals (Table 1). The 13C NMR spectrum indicated
27 carbon resonances, which were classified by DEPT and HMQC
experiments as one carbonyl carbon (dC 201.0), one trisubstituted
double bond (dC 173.4 and 123.1), three oxygenated methines (dC
78.1, 72.9 and 70.9), one oxygenated methylene (dC 67.2), four
methyls, eight methylenes, six methines and two quaternary
carbons. These NMR data were very similar to those of (25S)-
16(S), 22(S), 26-trihydroxycholest-4-en-3-one,9 except for the ab-
sence of one methylene proton and carbon resonances and the
presence of one oxygenated methine [dH 3.35 (1H, m); dC 78.1].
The HMBC correlation of H-18/C-12 and NOE correlations of H-
12/H-9 and H-14 (Fig. 2) confirmed the presence of an OH group
at C-12. The relative stereochemistry was assumed to be the same
as that of (25S)-16(S),22(S),26-trihydroxycholest-4-en-3-one9
based on the J values and confirmed by the NOE correlations of
H-8/H-18 and H-19, H-9/H-12 and H-14, H-16/H-14, H-17 and H-
21, and H-18/H-20 (Fig. 2). The b-orientiation of the OH group at
C-12 was confirmed by the NOE correlations of H-12/H-9 and H-
14. The relative configuration of the OH group at C-22 was anti
to the Me group at C-20 by comparing the J value of H-22 (t,
J = 6.5 Hz) with that of (22S)-bethosides B and C [t, J = 6.9 Hz for
positive-ion HR-FAB-MS. The IR spectrum displayed strong OH
vibrations at 3382 cmꢀ1 and a carbonyl band at 1656 cmꢀ1. The
1H NMR spectrum of 2 showed an anomeric proton at dH 4.23
(1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-10), which is a characteristic signal for a b-
glucopyranosyl unit, and six oxygenated protons attributed to a su-
gar at dH 3.87 (1H, dd, J = 12.0, 2.0 Hz, H-60a), 3.66 (1H, dd, J = 12.0,
10.5 Hz, H-60b), 3.34 (1H, m, H-30), 3.29 (1H, m, H-40), 3.27 (1H, m,
H-50) and 3.18 (1H, dd, J = 9.0, 8.0 Hz, H-20). The 13C NMR spectrum
of 2 showed signals for a b-glucopyranosyl unit (dC 103.4, 76.8,
76.6, 73.9, 70.5 and 61.5) and the other signals in the 1H and 13C
NMR spectra were fairly similar to those of 1. The chemical shifts
of C-26 in 2 [dH 3.74, 3.38 (each 1H, dd J = 10.5, 6.5 Hz); dC 74.9]
were downfield shifted compared with those of C-26 in 1, indicat-
ing the location of the b-glucopyranosyl unit at C-26. This was
confirmed by the HMBC correlation of H-10/C-26 (Fig. 3). The enzy-
matic hydrolysis of 2 with b-glucosidase (Almonds) yielded the
aglycone 2a, whose 1H NMR spectrum was in good agreement with
that of 1, and
pound 2 was characterized as (25R)-12b,16b,22b,26-(b-
D
-glucose {½a 2D5
ꢁ
+62.2 (c = 0.05, H2O)}. Thus, com-
-glucopyr-
D
anosyl)-tetrahydroxycholest-4-en-3-one and named longipenane
26-O-b- -glucopyranoside.
D
Compound 3 was obtained as a white powder. The molecular
formula was determined to be C45H74O18 from the molecular ion
peak [M+H]+ at m/z 903.4954 (calcd for 903.4953) in the posi-
tive-ion HR-FAB-MS. The 1H NMR spectrum indicated the presence
of two tertiary methyl groups [dH 0.93 and 0.81 (each 3H, s)], two
secondary methyl groups [dH 1.14 and 1.08 (each 3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz)],
typical steroid methyls, and three anomeric proton [dH 6.27 (1H, br
s), 5.20 and 4.97 (each 1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz)] signals showing HSQC cor-
relations with three anomeric carbon signals [dC 102.8, 107.6 and
101.4, respectively] (Table 2). Comparison of the signals from the
aglycone part of 3 in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra with those from
the aglycone part of cistocardin12 showed that the aglycone part of
3 was the same as that of cistocardin, and this was confirmed
H-22 (22b); ddd, J = 11.1, 3.3, 2.1 Hz for H-22 (22
configuration at C-25 was confirmed as R by examination of the
a
)].10 The absolute
Mosher esters of 1; R ester 1a showed a larger difference (
D
d
0.211) between two H-26 signals than that of S ester 1b (
D
d
0.081 ppm).11 Thus, compound 1 was characterized as (25R)-
12b,16b,22b,26-tetrahydroxycholest-4-en-3-one
and
named
longipenane.
Compound 2 was obtained as a colorless gum. The molecular
formula was determined to be C33H54O10 from the molecular ion
peak [M+H]+ at m/z 611.3795 (calcd for 611.3795) in the