2076
J. C. Hethcox et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 2074–2076
Acknowledgments
We thank the National Institutes of Health (GM 25439) and the
Robert A. Welch Foundation (F-0652) for generous support of this
research. We would also like to thank Dr. Vincent Lynch (The Uni-
versity of Texas) for obtaining X-ray data for compound 2.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures and spectral
data for all new compounds) associated with this article can be
Scheme 4. Synthesis of (À)-dihydroprotolichesterenic acid.
References and notes
target. (À)-Dihydroprotolichesterenic acid has been synthesized
three times in racemic form16a–c and twice in enantiomerically
pure form.16d,e However, we envisioned that a more concise enan-
1. Crimmin, M. J.; Feckett, P. R.; Davis, M. H. British Bio-Technology Ltd.; WO 94
21,625; Chem. Abstr. 1995, 122, 188173y.
2. Cavallito, C. J.; Fruehauf, D. M.; Bailey, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 3724–
3726.
3. Worthen, D. M.; Zimmerman, T. J.; Wind, C. A. Invest. Ophthalmol. 1974, 13, 296.
4. Nakamura, N.; Hirakawa, A.; Gao, J.; Kakuda, H.; Shiro, M.; Komatsu, Y.; Sheu,
C.; Hattori, M. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 46–48.
tioselective synthesis of
methodology.
2 could be achieved using our
With the key intermediate 11a in hand, all that remained to
complete a synthesis of 2 was a diastereoselective aldol reaction,
which we envisioned would proceed with concomitant lactone for-
mation, and removal of the chiral auxiliary. Although an aldol reac-
tion of a substrate similar to 11a had been reported,17 use of those
conditions for 11a gave 12 in only 24% yield. After some experi-
mentation, we discovered that enolization of 11a at a higher con-
centration (0.9 M) with n-Bu2BOTf (1.5 equiv) in the presence of
Hünig’s base (1.7 equiv), followed by the addition of myristyl alde-
hyde (1.2 equiv) and reacting for 15 h at 0 °C furnished the lactone
12 in 53% yield (95% based upon recovered starting material) and
>95:5 dr (based on 1H NMR of the crude reaction mixture) (Scheme
4). This aldol reaction was surprisingly sluggish, and despite re-
peated efforts, we were unable to identify conditions that would
provide complete conversion. Hydrolysis of the oxazolidinone ring
in 12 under standard conditions delivered (À)-dihydroprotoliche-
sterenic acid (2) in 85% yield, thereby completing a four step, enan-
tioselective synthesis of 2 that proceeded in 31% overall yield (56%
based upon recovered starting material). The structure of synthetic
2 was confirmed by X-ray crystallography,18 and it also gave 1H
and 13C NMR spectra and optical rotation data consistent with
those published.16a
5. For a review on synthetic strategies to access succinates, see: Arason, K. M.;
Bergmeier, S. C. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2002, 34, 337–366.
6. (a) Beckett, R. P.; Crimmin, M. J.; Davis, M. H.; Spavold, Z. Synlett 1993, 137–
138; (b) Decicco, C. P.; Nelson, D. J.; Corbett, R. L.; Dreabit, J. C. J. Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 4782–4785.
7. (a) Baran, P. S.; DeMartino, M. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7083–7086; (b)
DeMartino, M. P.; Chen, K.; Baran, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11546–
11560.
8. (a) Stack, J. G.; Curran, D. P.; Rebek, J., Jr.; Ballester, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 5918–5920; (b) Sibi, M. P.; Ji, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 36, 274–276.
9. Nicolás, E.; Russell, K. C.; Hruby, V. J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 766–770.
10. Dambacher, J.; Anness, R.; Pollock, P.; Bergdahl, M. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 2097–
2110.
11. Shanahan, C. S.; Ludolf, B.; Fuller, N.; Martin, S. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52,
4076–4079.
12. (a) Evans, D. A.; Scheidt, K. A.; Johnston, J. N.; Willis, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 4480–4491; (b) Evans, D. A.; Willis, M. C.; Johnston, J. N. Org. Lett.
1999, 1, 865–868.
13. Ho, G. J.; Mathre, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2271–2273.
14. The chemical shifts for the olefinic carbon atoms were assigned based upon
HMBC and INADEQUATE spectra.
15. For a recent review on strategies to access paraconic acids, see: Bandichhor, R.;
Nosse, B.; Reiser, O. Top. Curr. Chem. 2005, 243, 43–72.
16. (a) Martin, T.; Rodriguez, C. M.; Martin, V. S. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6450–6453;
(b) Mandal, P. K.; Roy, S. C. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 11395–11398; (c) Pohmakotr,
M.; Harnying, W.; Tuchinda, P.; Reutrakul, V. Helv. Chim. Acta 2002, 85, 3792–
3813; (d) Mulzer, J.; Salimi, N.; Hartl, H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 457–
471; (e) Banks, M. R.; Dawson, I. M.; Gosney, I.; Hodgson, P. K. G.; Thorburn, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3567–3570.
17. Sibi, M. P.; Liu, P.; Ji, J.; Hajra, S.; Chen, J. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1738–1745.
18. Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the structures in this
Letter have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as
supplementary publication No. CCDC 918018. Copies of the data can be
obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge
CB2 1EZ, UK. Fax: +44 (0)1223 336033 or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.Uk.
In summary, we report the first diastereoselective conjugate
addition of alkyl and aryl monoorganocuprates, Li[RCuI], to chiral
fumarates, thereby providing a rapid and stereoselective entry to
substituted succinate derivatives. The practical utility of the meth-
od was demonstrated by its application to the concise, enantiose-
lective synthesis of (À)-dihydroprotolichesterinic acid (2).