interest in functionalizing the indole skeleton. Classical
and widely used methods include FriedelꢀCrafts acyla-
tion, alkylation, allylic alkylation, and conjugate addition,
which are based on the carbon nucleophilicity of indoles.8
Recently, transition metal-catalyzed C(sp2)ꢀH bond acti-
vation has emerged as an alternative strategy. Regioselec-
tive alkylation,9 alkenylation,10 and arylation11 of indoles
at either the C2 or C3 position have been achieved. By
contrast, direct carbonylation of indoles is not well devel-
oped, and only a few catalytic systems for esterification
and amidation of indoles have been reported.12 Herein we
describe a novel protocol for the direct coupling of indoles/
CO/alkynes to afford linear R,β-unsaturated ketones in a
highly regioselective and chemoselective manner.
Initially, we subjected N-methylindole (1a) and methyl
propiolate (2a) to Drent’s alkoxycarbonylation condi-
tions, and the desired R,β-unsaturated ketone 3a was
isolated in 10% yield, as well as 16% of the 1,3-diindolyl
compound3a0 (Table 1, entry 1). Thestrong Brønstedacid,
TsOH, simultaneously promotes the carbonylation of
alkynes and the Michael addition between indole 1a and
the product 3a. Increasing the acid promoter to 20 mol %
selectively furnished the product 3a0 in 46% yield (Table 1,
entry 5). Employing 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)-
xanthene (Xantphos) gave the same tendency but showed
higher activities than other phosphines, such as 2-PyPPh2,
PPh3, dppb, and dppp. Pivalic acid, which is weak and
widely employed in C(sp2)ꢀH bond activation,13 did not
show any activity for this transformation (Table1, entry 8).
Based on the investigation of the mechanism for the
alkoxycarbonylation of alkynes, the cationic palladium
complex, Pd(CH3CN)4(BF4)2, was tested as a surrogate
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa
entry
catalyst
additive (%) PCO (psi) 3ab (%) 3a0b (%)
1
PdCl2/PyPPh2
TsOH(5)
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
200
50
10
16
2c
3c
4c
5c
6c
7c
8c
9c
PdCl2(PPh3)2
TsOH (5)
TsOH (5)
TsOH (10)
TsOH (20)
TsOH (30)
n.d.
14
trace
27
PdCl2(Xantphos)
PdCl2(Xantphos)
PdCl2(Xantphos)
PdCl2(Xantphos)
PdCl2(Xantphos)
PdCl2(Xantphos)
PdCl2(dppb)
8
43
trace
trace
29
46d
44
trace
trace
11
PivOH(30)
TsOH (20)
TsOH (20)
21
10
10c PdCl2(dppp)
trace
70
32
11e Pd2þ/Xantphos
12e Pd2þ/DPEphos
13e Pd2þ/tBuXantphos
14e Pd2þ/Xantphos
15e Pd2þ/Xantphos
16e Pd2þ/Xantphos
17e Pd2þ/Xantphos
18f Pd2þ/Xantphos
4
16
8
trace
33
trace
9
trace
66
trace
3
400
500
300
62
3
34
35
a All reactions were carried out with 1.0 mmol of 1a, 1.5 mmol of 2a,
4 mol % of palladium precursor and ligand, 5 mL of THF, 105 °C, 15 h.
b Isolated yield based on 1a. c Using palladium complexes. d Molecular
structure was determined by HSQC and HMQC spectra. e Pd2þ
=
Pd(CH3CN)4(BF4)2. f 70 °C.
for the mixture of acids and palladium salts. Gratifyingly,
the Xantphos/Pd(CH3CN)4(BF4)2 system gave the antici-
pated product 3a in 70% isolated yield, also along with 4%
of the dimer 3a0 (Table 1, entry 11). Similar phosphines
to Xantphos, e.g., bis(2-diphenylphosphinophenyl) ether
(DPEphos) and 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(di-tert-butylphosphino)-
xanthene (t-BuXantphos), gave unsatisfactory results for
this transformation. It is noteworthy that lowering the
pressure of carbon monoxide proved to be detrimental to
both efficiency and selectivity (Table 1, entries 14 and 15).
The outcome of this procedure also significantly depends on
the nature of solvents, and THF is the best reaction solvent
(for the influence of other parameters, see the full Table 1 in
the Supporting Information).
With the optimized reaction conditions established, the
generality of the reaction was explored using a variety of
indoles (Table 2). Interestingly, the system tolerates the
active NH group and smoothly converts free indole to the
desired product 3b, albeit in moderate yield (54%). The
efficiency of this transformation is highly dependent upon
the electronic properties of R2 groups. When electron-
donating groups, i.e., Bz, nBu, iPr, and tBu, were presented
at the R2 position, the products 3cꢀf were isolated in good
yields (63ꢀ77%; Table 2, entries 3ꢀ6). In contrast, the
strongly electron-withdrawing group, Ac, totally inhibited
the process (Table 2, entry 10). The system is compatible
with the Reppe carbonylation candidate CC double
bond and the weakly coordinating CN group. This
(7) (a) Moore, E. J.; Pretzer, W. R.; Oconnell, T. J.; Harris, J.;
Labounty, L.; Chou, L.; Grimmer, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
5888. (b) Chatani, N.; Fukuyama, T.; Kakiuchi, F.; Murai, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 493. (c) Fukuyama, T.; Chatani, N.; Tatsumi, J.;
Kakiuchi, F.; Murai, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11522. (d) Chatani,
N.; Ie, Y.; Kakiuchi, F.; Murai, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8645. (e)
Chatani, N.; Asaumi, T.; Ikeda, T.; Yorimitsu, S.; Ishii, Y.; Kakiuchi,
F.; Murai, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12882.
(8) For selected reviews, see: (a) Bandini, M.; Melloni, A.; Umani-
Ronchi, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 550. (b) Cacchi, S.; Fabrizi,
G. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2873. (c) Bandini, M.; Eichholzer, A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9608.
(9) (a) Jiao, L.; Herdtweck, E.; Bach, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134,
14563. (b) Pan, S.; Ryu, N.; Shibata, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134,
17474. (c) Jiao, L.; Bach, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12990.
(10) (a) Grimster, N. P.; Gauntlett, C.; Godfrey, C. R. A.; Gaunt,
M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3125. (b) Garcıa-Rubia, A.;
ꢀ
Arrayas, R. G.; Carretero, J. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6511.
(c) Ding, Z. H.; Yoshikai, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 4698. (d)
Kandukuri, S. R.; Schiffner, J. A.; Oestreich, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 1265.
(11) For selected references, see: (a) Wang, X.; Lane, B. S.; Sames, D.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4996. (b) Lane, B. S.; Brown, M. A.; Sames,
D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8050. (c) Deprez, N. R.; Kalyani, D.;
Krause, A.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4972. (d) Stuart,
D. R.; Fagnou, K. Science 2007, 316, 1172. (e) Potavathri, S.; Pereira,
K. C.; Gorelsy, S. I.; Pike, A.; LeBris, A. P.; DeBoef, B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2010, 132, 14676.
(12) (a) Peng, J.; Liu, L.; Hu, Z.; Huang, J.; Zhu, Q. Chem. Commun.
2012, 3772. (b) Xing, Q.; Shi, L.; Lang, R.; Xia, C.; Li, F. Chem.
Commun. 2012, 11023. (c) Lang, R.; Wu, J.; Shi, L.; Xia, C.; Li, F.
Chem. Commun. 2011, 12553. (d) Zhang, H.; Liu, D.; Chen, C.; Liu, C.;
Lei, A. Chem.ꢀEur. J. 2011, 17, 9581. (e) Lang, R.; Shi, L.; Li, D.; Xia,
C.; Li, F. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4130. (f) Tobisu, M.; Yamaguchi, S.;
Chatani, N. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3351.
(13) Ackerman, L. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1315.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 8, 2013
2035