POMs 3–5 were characterized by NMR and IR spectro-
scopy, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. All techni-
ques were in agreement with the proposed structures (see
the Supporting Information for details). For example, the
31P NMR spectrum of 3 showed three peaks. Two (d=À12.1
and À6.6 ppm) were those of the Dawson phosphates, with
the P1 (d=À6.6 ppm) peak showing coupling satellites from
the tin coupling. The third peak (d=28.3 ppm) was charac-
teristic of an aurated phosphine. IR spectra display the typi-
cal strong bands for the Dawson phosphotungstates (in the
700–1100 cmÀ1 range). The bands at higher wavenumber are
those of the organic ligands and counterions. Finally, the
mass spectra show intense signals of the intact anions of 3–5
associated with TBA and H+ cations, confirming their struc-
ture. Minor fragmentations correspond to the loss of AuCl
or ClÀ.
In a typical catalytic cyclization, allene 1a was treated
with catalyst 3 (5 mol%) in the presence of AgSbF6
(5 mol%) in dichloromethane at room temperature. To our
pleasure, compound 10a was isolated in nearly quantitative
yield (Table 1, entry 1) after two days. Diversely substituted
b,b-diaryl b-hydroxy allenes possessing electron-donating
and electron-withdrawing substituents also gave the expect-
ed cyclized products in excellent yields (Table 1, entries 2–
4). Triarylphosphine derivatives (4 and 5) reacted similarly,
albeit the reactions were slower taking 5 days to reach com-
pletion (Table 1, entries 5–8).
catalytic system. This drives the reaction toward cyclization
by allene activation without byproduct formation. Further
support for this hypothesis can be derived from the lack of
reaction in the absence of a cationic gold species.
We designed several control experiments to probe our
tethering approach. First, omission of the POM–Au hybrid
resulted in formation of vinylallene 2a, showing that
AgSbF6 alone also leads to protolysis (Table S1 in the Sup-
porting Information). Second, the reactions were tested with
a POM additive that was not covalently bound to the gold
(Table 1, entries 9–12). Dawson derivative TBA6ACHTUNRGTENUNG[P2W18O62]
was chosen because of its structural similarity to catalysts 3–
5. In all cases, cyclized products 10a–d were isolated, albeit
after prolonged reaction times. In the case of the bis(p-me-
thoxyaryl) substituent, however, a significant amount of
elimination was observed (37%; Table 1, entry 10). When
pyridine was used as a base for the reaction of 1b (Table 1,
entry 13), the reaction was really slow (more than ten days
to reach 90% completion) and some vinylallene 2b was
again observed (6%) together with the expected 10b, isolat-
ed in 76% yield.[7a]
Overall, the controls showed that the hybrid POM–Au
catalysts are the best compromise between yield and reac-
tion rates, for the cyclization of very sensitive allenols. Silver
hexafluoroantimonate is able to generate protons also, but
not to promote cyclization by itself, thus the cyclized prod-
ucts do come from gold activation of the allenes.
The less sensitive allenyl alcohol 1e also led to the cycli-
zation, delivering 80% of 2e after three days (Scheme 3).
This substrate provides a key comparison with the literatur-
e.[7a] In the absence of an amine buffer, the yield for the cyc-
lization of 1e was in the sixties, and slightly improved with
our catalysts. Amine buffering was a way to improve yields,
but as before this impacted even more on overall reactivity,
since the cyclization took five days to reach a yield similar
to the one obtained with 3.
Table 1. Cyclization of acid-sensitive b,b-diaryl b-hydroxy allenes cata-
lyzed by the POM–Au hybrids.
Entry
Substrate
Ar
Cat.
Product, yield [%]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1a
1b
1c
1d
1a
1b
1a
1b
1a
1b
1c
1d
1b
Ph
3
3
3
3
4
4
5
5
–
–
–
–
10a, 95
10b, 96
10c, 97
10d, 88
4-MeO-C6H4
3,5-Me2-C6H3
4-F-C6H4
Ph
4-MeO-C6H4
Ph
4-MeO-C6H4
Ph
4-MeO-C6H4
3,5-Me2-C6H3
4-F-C6H4
4-MeO-C6H4
10a, 91[a]
10b, 96[a]
10a, 99[a]
10b, 80[a]
10a, 75[c]
10b, 55[d]
10c, 58[e]
10d, 85[f]
10b, 76[h]
[b]
9
[b]
10
11
12
13
[b]
Scheme 3. Cyclization of allenol 1e.
[b]
[g]
–
The POM–Au conjugates are more efficient than running
the reaction in the mere presence of a POM. It is known
that POMs can be ligands for transition metals.[6,14] Thus, the
gold atom (especially in its cationic form) may interact with
the polyoxometallic surface, as in A (Scheme 4a), resulting
in catalyst deactivation. It might also be possible that the
POM is basic enough to also capture the proton of the oxo-
nium vinylgold intermediate B (Scheme 4b). The proto-
[a] Reaction took 5 days. [b] Conditions: AuClPPh3 (5 mol%), AgSbF6
(5 mol%), TBA6A[P2W18O62] (5 mol%), CH2Cl2, RT. [c] Isolated yield. Re-
CHTUNGTRENNUNG
action was stopped after 8 days (88% completion). [d] Isolated yield. Re-
action took 10 days, 37% of vinylallene 2b was also isolated. [e] Isolated
yield. Reaction was stopped after 10 days (69% completion). [f] Isolated
yield. Reaction took one week. [g] Conditions: AuClPPh3 (2 mol%),
AgSbF6 (2 mol%), pyridine (2 mol%), CH2Cl2, RT. [h] Isolated yield.
Reaction was stopped after 10 days (90% completion). 6% of 2b was
also formed.
À
deauration of the vinyl gold bond in B would thus become
a slow rate-limiting step because it requires the deprotona-
tion of the POM surface of C.[15] This would also explain
why stronger bases reduce the reactivity even more.
This shows that the polyoxometalate is indeed able to
capture the adventitious protons from the gold/silver mixed
&
2
&
ꢂ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 0000, 00, 0 – 0
ÝÝ
These are not the final page numbers!