the only reaction observed under similar reaction condi-
tions (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). While transmetalation to
magnesium or zinc after bromine/lithium exchange in
order to promote an intramolecular carbomagnesiation
or carbozincation was equally inefficient (Table 1, entries 3
collected in Figure 1. The reaction proceeded smoothly in
most cases, with indoles 8aÀl being obtained in moderate
to good yields regardless of the substituent of the ynamide.
Indeed, aryl-substituted ynamides 5aÀ5h were found to
smoothly undergo intramolecular 5-endo-dig carbocupra-
tion regardless of the substitution pattern or the electronic
properties of the aromatic substituent. The corresponding
3-aryl-indoles 8aÀ8h were predominantly formed in all
cases along with minor amounts of debrominated starting
materials. The produced compounds are very useful build-
ing blocks, with many biologically active indoles posses-
sing an aromatic group at C-3 and no substituent at C-2.19
The reaction worked equally well with a styryl group,
affording the corresponding indole 8i in 54% yield; with
alkyl groups, no competitive propargylic deprotonation or
proton transfer was observed during the preparation of
propyl-substituted indole 8k. Finally, a TIPS-substituted
indole (8l) could also be obtained using the metalation/
intramolecular carbocupration sequence, although with
less efficiency.
and 4), the addition of 1 equiv of CuCN 2LiCl17 was
3
found to have a dramatic effect on the outcome of the
intramolecular carbometalation reaction, the desired in-
dole 8a being formed in 62% yield (Table 1, entry 5). The
use of other reagents for the metalation step was then
briefly evaluated but with little success, with n-butyl- and
s-butyllithium (with or without additional TMEDA) giving
lower yields (Table 1, entries 6À8) and competitive inter-
molecular carbomagnesiation being observed with Knochel’s
iPrMgCl LiCl,18 which was found to be remarkably efficient
3
for the intramolecular copper-catalyzed carbomagnesiation
of alkynyl(2-bromoaryl)thioethers (Table 1, entry 9).14c
Switching from diethyl ether to THF or changing the
copper source to CuBr SMe2 or CuI P(OEt)3 was found
3
3
to be detrimental for the yield (Table 1, entries 10À13). We
next looked at the possibility of using a catalytic amount of
CuCN 2LiCl: if the copper-catalyzed intramolecular car-
3
bolithiation was still operative, the yield was however
lower. The effect of the temperature was finally evaluated,
and it was found that the cyclization was too slow when
the reaction temperature was kept at À78 °C (Table 1,
entry 14) while slowly warming the reaction mixture
from À78 °C to room temperature gave the desired indole
8a in 62% yield (Table 1, entry 15), conditions that we kept
for the intramolecular carbocupration. Of note, radical
(Table 1, entry 16) and palladium-catalyzed (Table 1, entry 17)
cyclizations were also evaluated but failed to give the
desired indole, as reduction or cyclization to oxazolones
by nucleophilic attack of the Boc group to the activated
alkyne was the major respective reaction pathway in these
cases.
With the optimized conditions, consisting of a bromine/
lithium exchange with tert-butyllithium in ether at À78 °C
followed by transmetalation with CuCN 2LiCl and intra-
3
molecular carbocupration upon warming the reaction to
room temperature, we next evaluated the scope of this
reaction. Tothisaim, a set of N-(2-bromophenyl)ynamides
5aÀl possessing various representative substituents on the
alkyne were submitted to the metalation/transmetalation/
carbocupration sequence: results from those studies are
Figure 1. Scope of the intramolecular carbocupration for the
synthesis of 3-substituted indoles.
(15) For recent reviews on the synthesis of indoles, see: (a) Gribble,
G. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 1045. (b) Alonso, F.;
Beletskaya, I. P.; Yus, M. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3079. (c) Nakamura,
I.; Yamamoto, Y. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 2127. (d) Cacchi, S.; Fabrizi, G.
Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2873. (e) Humphrey, G. R.; Kuethe, J. T. Chem.
Rev. 2006, 106, 2875. (f) Kruger, K.; Tillack, A.; Beller, M. Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2008, 350, 2153. (g) Vincente, R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9,
6469. (h) Taber, D. F.; Tirunahari, P. K. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 7195. (i)
Cacchi, S.; Fabrizi, G. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, PR215. (j) Platon, M.;
Amardeil, R.; Djakovitchb, L.; Hierso, J.-C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41,
3929. (k) Inman, M.; Moody, C. J. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 29.
(16) (a) Fischer, E.; Jourdan, F. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1883, 16,
2241. (b) Fischer, E.; Hess, O. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1884, 17, 559.
(17) Knochel, P.; Yeh, M. C. P.; Berk, S. C.; Talbert, J. J. Org. Chem.
1988, 53, 2390.
This intramolecular carbometalation from readily avail-
able ynamides therefore provides an efficient and selective
(19) For selected examples, see: (a) Andersen, K.; Perregaard, J.;
Arn, J.; Nielsen, J. B.; Begtrup, M. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 4823. (b)
Leboho, T. C.; Michael, J. P.; van Otterlo, W. A. L.; de Koning, C. B.;
van Vuuren, S. F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 4948. (c)
Richardson, T. I.; Clarke, C. A.; Yu, K.-L.; Yee, Y. K.; Bleisch, T. J.;
Lopez, J. E.; Jones, S. A.; Hughes, N. E.; Muehl, B. S.; Lugar, C. W.;
Moore, T. L.; Shetler, P. K.; Zink, R. W.; Osborne, J. J.; Montrose-
Rafizadeh, C.; Patel, N.; Geiser, A. G.; Galvin, R. J. S.; Dodge, J. A.
ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 148. (d) Mesangeau, C.; Amata, E.;
Alsharif, W.; McCurdy, C. R.; Seminerio, M. J.; Robson, M. J.;
Matsumoto, R. R.; Poupaert, J. H. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 5154.
(18) (a) Krasovskiy, A.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
3333. (b) Krasovskiy, A.; Straub, B. F.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2006, 45, 159.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C