760
K. Saito et al.
LETTER
25, using conditions similar to those described in Scheme In the study described above, we have demonstrated that
2, delivered 26 in 43% yield.
approaches that mimic the newly proposed biosynthetic
pathways can be employed to generate the peptide-type
units in the boneratamides A–C and exigurin. Although
the yields of Ugi reaction in our preliminary results are
only moderate, the concise nature of the multicomponent,
one-pot procedures makes the routes particularly attrac-
tive. In addition, our studies shed some light on the poten-
tially important role played by Ugi reactions in the
biosynthesis of natural products found in marine organ-
isms, which suggests possible involvement of a putative
‘ugiase’ enzyme. The Ugi reaction has been exploited ex-
tensively for combinatorial diversity-oriented synthesis in
the filed of medicinal chemistry, and it is quite surprising
for us to recognize that Nature also employs the Ugi reac-
tion to build up molecular diversity in natural product bio-
synthesis. Further studies on the synthesis of
boneratamides are now under investigation in our labora-
tory.
Parallel to our synthetic studies of boneratamides, we
have surveyed the literatures in order to uncover more ex-
amples of marine natural products that might be biosyn-
thesized via pathways involving Ugi coupling reaction.
This literature browsing found two buried examples, exig-
urin (27) and halichonadin G (28; Figure 2). Exigurin (27)
was isolated by Ikegami group in 2003 from the marine
sponge Geodia exigna.14 In 2011, Kobayashi and his co-
workers isolated halichonadin G (28) from the sponge
Halichondria sp.15 These terpenes share the interesting
amide structural unit 29. We envisioned that the common
structural unit 29 could be synthesized with a similar sce-
nario using U-5C-4CR, which employs a terpene isocya-
nide and a glycine derivative along with formaldehyde.
OMe
OMe
O
O
H
H
N
O
N
O
N
Me
Acknowledgment
H
O
We are grateful for the financial support provided by a Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research (C) (23510258) from MEXT.
NH
N
H
Supporting Information for this article is available online at
exigurin (27)
halichonadin G (28)
r
t
iornat
H
MeO
N
References
N
R
terpene
O
O
(1) (a) Ichikawa, Y. Chem. Lett. 1990, 1347. (b) Ichikawa, Y.
Synlett 1991, 715. (c) Ichikawa, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1992, 2135. (d) Ichikawa, Y.; Yamazaki, M.; Isobe,
M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1993, 2429. (e) Ichikawa,
Y.; Matsuda, Y.; Okumura, K.; Nakamura, M.; Masuda, T.;
Kotsuki, H.; Nakano, K. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2520.
(2) (a) Williams, D. E.; Patrick, B. O.; Tahir, A.; Van Soest, R.;
Roberge, M.; Andersen, R. J. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 1752.
(b) Blunt, J. W.; Copp, B. R.; Munro, M. H. G.; Northcote,
P. T.; Prinsep, M. R. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 26.
(3) (a) Di Blasio, B.; Fattorusso, E.; Magno, S.; Mayol, L.;
Pedone, C.; Santacroce, C.; Sica, D. Tetrahedron 1976, 32,
473. (b) Caine, D.; Deutsch, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100,
8030.
(4) (a) Ugi, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1962, 1, 8. (b) Ugi,
I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1982, 21, 810. (c) Dömling,
A.; Ugi, I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3168.
(d) Dömling, A. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 17.
(5) Tanaka, N.; Suto, S.; Ishiyama, H.; Kubota, T.; Yamano, A.;
Shiro, M.; Fromont, J.; Kobayashi, J. Org. Lett. 2012, 14,
3498.
(6) Endo, A.; Yanagisawa, A.; Abe, M.; Tohma, S.; Kan, T.;
Fukuyama, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6552.
(7) (a) Ugi, I.; Steinbrückner, C. Chem. Ber. 1961, 94, 2802.
(b) Isenring, H. P.; Hofheinz, W. Synthesis 1981, 385.
(c) Hatanaka, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Nitta, H.; Ishimaru, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 3883. (d) Gedey, S.; Van der
Eycken, J.; Fülöp, F. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1967.
(8) Liu, Z.; Nefzi, A. J. Comb. Chem. 2010, 12, 566.
(9) A solution of L-glutamic acid 1-methyl ester (13; 430 mg,
2.67 mmol) and acetone (8; 1.30 mL, 17.8 mmol) in MeOH
(25.0 mL) was treated with tert-butyl isocyanide (12; 0.20
mL, 1.78 mmol). After stirring at r.t. for 1.5 h, the solution
terpene
29: R = Me or CONH
Figure 2 Exigurin, halichonadin G and their common amide struc-
tural unit 29
We examined the synthesis of the common structural unit
29 in exigurin (Scheme 8). The model isocyanide 30 was
prepared from (–)-menthol by utilizing a procedure simi-
lar to that described for the preparation of its enantiomer
25 in Scheme 7. One-pot multicomponent Ugi reaction of
isocyanide 30, paraformaldehyde and sarcosine (31) in
methanol led to the formation of the terpene amide 32 in
45% yield. Although low yielding, this potentially biomi-
metic one-step U-5C-4CR approach to construction of the
structural unit 29 found in the marine natural product ex-
igurin is impressive.
OMe
OH
O
N
O
O
31
Me
N
(HCHO)n
H
Me
N
C
NH
MeOH, 50 °C
(45%)
32
30
Scheme 8 Synthesis of an exigurin analogue
Synlett 2013, 24, 757–761
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York