J. J. P. Sejberg et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 4970–4972
4971
Br
method, wherein an allyl gem-dicarboxylate acts as the allyl
donor,8 to obtain optically pure mono-protected anti-diol 4, which
could then be taken through to (+)-aspercyclide A by a route anal-
ogous to that which we developed in our racemic synthesis.5 Due
to problems with migration of an acetyl protecting group during
the initial optimization of the reaction, the method described by
Krische and co-workers involves acylative capping of the crude
mono-protected diol to give diester products.8 However, we sus-
pected that the migration would not occur with the mono-benzo-
ate. Gratifyingly, this was indeed the case, eliminating the need for
a potentially difficult selective deprotection of the homoallylic
alcohol over the allylic alcohol. Thus, in our hands, treatment of
n-hexanal with gem-dibenzoate 2 and iridium catalyst 3 furnished
mono-protected anti-diol 4 in moderate to good yields (47–61%)
and high optical purity (98.0–99.6% ee) on both small and medium
scale (i.e., 20–400 mg of hexanal) (Scheme 1).
5
Cl
Br
O
NaH
OBz
O
OBz
C5H11
THF
reflux, 2.5 h
(80%)
O
HO
C5H11
4
6
K2CO3, MeOH
rt, 17 h then 50 oC, 1 h
(93%)
PMBBr
KHMDS
Br
Br
O
O
THF
OPMB
C5H11
OH
C5H11
-78 oC, 1 h
then rt, 1.5 h
(quant.)
O
O
8
7
(1:4 mixture of rotamers)
Initially, we carried this Bz-protected anti-diol forward in the
synthesis, but we were unable to achieve Heck–Mizoroki macro-
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Ullmann coupling precursor 8.
cyclization, possibly due to p-allyl palladium formation. We there-
fore decided to switch protecting groups early on in the synthesis.
Thus, treatment of anti-diol 4 with sodium hydride and 2-bromo-
6-methylbenzoyl chloride (5) furnished benzoic ester 6 in good
yield. Removal of the benzoate protecting group was achieved by
treatment with K2CO3 in methanol11 giving alcohol 7 as what we
believe to be a mixture of rotamers (1:4) in excellent yield
(Scheme 2).12
The presence of these rotamers is likely due to hindered rota-
tion about the aryl–carbonyl carbon bond, the magnitude of the
barrier for which is presumably amplified by internal hydrogen
bonding between the OH and the carbonyl group (cf. compounds
6 and 8). Re-protection of the alcohol as the PMB ether by treat-
ment with KHMDS in the presence of PMBBr13 furnished Ullmann
coupling precursor 8 in quantitative yield (Scheme 2). Cu-mediated
Ullmann coupling with functionalized phenol 95 proceeded in
moderate yield using 30 mol % of either a Cu(I) or Cu(II) catalyst
in pyridine.14 However, employing a mixed Cu(I)/Cu(II) catalyst
system (1:1, 30 mol % copper in total) resulted in an improved
yield of 72% of biaryl ether 10 (Scheme 3).
O
O
X
O
O
CuO, Cu2O
K2CO3
O
O
8
O
pyridine
reflux, 19 h
(72%)
Br
OH
C5H11
CuI, NaI
OH
9
10
11
X = Br
N,N-dimethylethylenediamine
1,4-dioxane, 120 oC, 45 h
(86%)
X = I
12
Pd(acac)2,
, Cs2CO3, AgI
1,4-dioxane, reflux, 25 h
(53%)
MeO
N
N
OMe
12
O
O
OH OH
Copper-mediated aromatic Finkelstein halogen exchange15 then
gave the corresponding aryl iodide 11, which underwent the
Heck–Mizoroki16 macrocyclization in the presence of AgI (to
suppress dibenzofuran formation through direct arylation via
C–H activation17) to afford macrocycle 13 in 53% isolated yield.
p-TsOH-catalyzed acetonide removal proceeded smoothly to afford
diol 14 in good yield. Oxidation of the benzyl alcohol with MnO2
followed by removal of the PMB ether with BF3ÁEt2O gave (+)-
aspercyclide A (1) in 54% yield from 14 (Scheme 3). The optical
rotation measured for our material (+278) is higher than that
reported by Singh et al. (+191)1 and Sato and co-workers (+196)7,
p-TsOH-H2O
O
O
O
O
OPMB
C5H11
OPMB
C5H11
O
THF-MeOH
35 oC, 17 h
(77%)
O
13
14
1. MnO2, CH2Cl2, 40 oC, 5 h
2. BF3 Et O, CH2Cl , rt, 3 min
(54% ove2r 2 steps) 2
1 (+)-aspercyclide A
Scheme 3. Completion of the synthesis of (+)-aspercyclide A (1).
3
(5 mol%)
K3PO4, iPrOH
however the circular dichroism (CD) spectra recorded for our
material match that recorded for an original sample of (+)-aspercy-
clide A (kindly provided by Merck). The overall yield from hexanal
was 4.8–6.2% over the 10 steps.
OBz
O
THF
C5H11
BzO
OBz
HO
C5H11
60 oC, 48 h
(47-61%)
4
(98.0-99.6% ee)
2
A significant concern about the utility of (+)-aspercyclide A as a
lead for further development towards a therapeutic agent for asth-
ma and allergy is the presence of the ring-A aldehyde moiety. Alde-
hydes can potentially react with protein lysine side chains to form
Schiff bases leading to unselective irreversible toxicity.18 To dis-
count this mode of reactivity as being responsible for the
bioactivity of (+)-aspercyclide A we decided also to prepare a
derivative of aspercyclide A which did not contain an aldehyde
group—compound 15. We targeted a cyclic structure designed to
loosely mimic ring-A plus the six-membered ring formed by the
intramolecularly H-bonded hydroxyaldehyde motif. We envisaged
O
Ph Ph
P
O
O
Ir
O
P
O
Ph
Ph
O
CN
NO2
3
Scheme 1. Synthesis of optically pure anti-diol 4.