doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.09.003 B) Hanahan D, Weinberg RA.
Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–
674. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013.
14. Matts RL, Dixit A, Peterson LB, et al. Elucidation of the
Hsp90 C-terminal inhibitor binding site. ACS Chem Biol.
2011;6(8):800–807. doi:10.1021/cb200052x
3. Li J, Buchner J. Structure, function and regulation of the hsp90
machinery. Biomed J. 2013;36(3):106–117. doi:10.4103/2319-
4170.113230. B) Byrd KM, Blagg BSJ. Chaperone substrate
provides missing link for cancer drug discovery. J Biol Chem.
2018;293(7):2381–2382. doi:10.1074/jbc.H118.001591.
4. A) Prodromou C, Pearl LH. Structure and functional
relationships of Hsp90. Curr Cancer Drug Targets.
2003;3(5):301–323. doi:10.2174/1568009033481877. B) Schopf
FH, Biebl MM, Buchner J. The HSP90 chaperone machinery.
15. Donnelly AC, Mays JR, Burlison JA, et al. The design,
synthesis, and evaluation of coumarin ring derivatives of the
novobiocin scaffold that exhibit antiproliferative activity. J Org
Chem. 2008;73(22):8901–8920. doi:10.1021/jo801312r
16. Tran PL, Kim SA, Choi HS, Yoon JH, Ahn SG.
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate suppresses the expression of HSP70
and HSP90 and exhibits anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo.
BMC Cancer. 2010;10:276. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-10-276
17. Yin Z, Henry EC, Gasiewicz TA. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-
Nat
Rev
Mol
Cell
Biol.
2017;18(6):345–360.
gallate is
a
novel Hsp90 inhibitor. Biochemistry.
doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.20. C) Ali MM, Roe SM, Vaughan CK, et
al. Crystal structure of an Hsp90-nucleotide-p23/Sba1 closed
chaperone complex. Nature. 2006;440(7087):1013–1017.
doi:10.1038/nature04716.
5. A) Chatterjee S, Burns TF. Targeting Heat Shock Proteins in
Cancer: A Promising Therapeutic Approach. Int J Mol Sci.
2017;18(9):1978. doi:10.3390/ijms18091978. B) Zuehlke AD,
Moses MA, Neckers L. Heat shock protein 90: its inhibition and
function. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373(1738),
doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0527
2009;48(2):336–345. doi:10.1021/bi801637q
18. Palermo CM, Westlake CA, Gasiewicz TA. Epigallocatechin
gallate inhibits aryl hydrocarbon receptor gene transcription
through an indirect mechanism involving binding to a 90 kDa
heat shock protein. Biochemistry. 2005;44(13):5041–5052.
doi:10.1021/bi047433p
19. Zhao H, Brandt GE, Galam L, Matts RL, Blagg BS.
Identification and initial SAR of silybin: an Hsp90 inhibitor.
Bioorg
Med
Chem
Lett.
2011;21(9):2659–2664.
doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.12.088.
6. Schulte TW, Akinaga S, Soga S, et al. Antibiotic radicicol
binds to the N-terminal domain of Hsp90 and shares important
biologic activities with geldanamycin. Cell Stress Chaperones.
1998;3(2):100–108.
20. Sreedhar AS, Soti C, Csermely P. Inhibition of Hsp90: a new
strategy for inhibiting protein kinases. Biochim Biophys Acta.
2004;1697(1-2):233–242. doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2003.11.027.
21. Shen G, Yu XM, Blagg BS. Syntheses of photolabile
doi:10.1379/14661268(1998)003<0100:arbttn>2.3.co;2.
7. A) Seo YH. Small Molecule Inhibitors to Disrupt Protein-
protein Interactions of Heat Shock Protein 90 Chaperone
Machinery. J Cancer Prev. 2015;20(1):5–11. doi: 10.15430 /JCP.
2015.20.1.5. B) Neckers L, Workman P. Hsp90 molecular
chaperone inhibitors: are we there yet?. Clin Cancer Res.
2012;18(1):64–76. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1000. C)
Workman P. Overview: translating Hsp90 biology into Hsp90
drugs. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2003;3(5):297–300.
doi:10.2174/1568009033481868.D) Li L, Wang L, You QD, Xu
XL. Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitors: An Update on
Achievements, Challenges, and Future Directions. J Med Chem.
2020;63(5):1798–1822. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00940
8. Marcu MG, Chadli A, Bouhouche I, Catelli M, Neckers LM.
The heat shock protein 90 antagonist novobiocin interacts with a
previously unrecognized ATP-binding domain in the carboxyl
terminus of the chaperone. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(47):37181–
37186. doi:10.1074/jbc.M003701200
novobiocin
analogues.
Bioorg
Med
Chem
Lett.
2004;14(23):5903–5906. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.09.017
22. Sgobba M, Degliesposti G, Ferrari AM, Rastelli G. Structural
models and binding site prediction of the C-terminal domain of
human Hsp90: a new target for anticancer drugs. Chem Biol
Drug 71(5):420–433. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0285.2008.00650.x
23. Kumar Mv V, Ebna Noor R, Davis RE, et al. Molecular
insights into the interaction of Hsp90 with allosteric inhibitors
targeting
the
C-terminal
domain.
Medchemcomm.
2018;9(8):1323–1331. doi:10.1039/c8md00151k
24. Hall JA, Forsberg LK, Blagg BS. Alternative approaches to
Hsp90 modulation for the treatment of cancer. Future Med
Chem. 2014;6(14):1587–1605. doi:10.4155/fmc.14.89.
25. A) Battiste JL, Wagner G. Utilization of site-directed spin
labeling and high-resolution heteronuclear nuclear magnetic
resonance for global fold determination of large proteins with
limited nuclear overhauser effect data. Biochemistry,
39(18):5355-65, doi:10.1021/bi000060h. B) Clore GM. Practical
aspects of paramagnetic relaxation enhancement in biological
macromolecules. In Methods in enzymology 2015, 564: 485-497.
Academic Press.
9. Bickel D, Gohlke H. C-terminal modulators of heat shock
protein of 90ꢀkDa (HSP90): State of development and modes of
action.
Bioorg
Med
Chem.
2019;27(21):115080.
doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2019.115080.
26. Kusuma BR, Zhang L, Sundstrom T, Peterson LB,
Dobrowsky RT, Blagg BS. Synthesis and evaluation of
novologues as C-terminal Hsp90 inhibitors with cytoprotective
activity against sensory neuron glucotoxicity. J Med Chem.
2012;55(12):5797–5812. doi:10.1021/jm300544c.
27. A) Yu XM, Shen G, Neckers L, et al. Hsp90 inhibitors
identified from a library of novobiocin analogues. J Am Chem
Soc. 2005;127(37):12778–12779. doi:10.1021/ja0535864. B)
Burlison JA, Neckers L, Smith AB, Maxwell A, Blagg BS.
Novobiocin: redesigning a DNA gyrase inhibitor for selective
inhibition of hsp90. Journal of the American Chemical Society.
2006;128(48):15529-36, doi:10.1021/ja065793p. C) Yu XM,
Shen G, Neckers L, Blake H, Holzbeierlein J, Cronk B, Blagg
BS. Hsp90 inhibitors identified from a library of novobiocin
analogues. Journal of the American Chemical Society.
2005;127(37):12778-9, doi:10.1021/ja0535864.
10. Schnur RC, Corman ML, Gallaschun RJ, et al. erbB-2
oncogene inhibition by geldanamycin derivatives: synthesis,
mechanism of action, and structure-activity relationships. J Med
Chem. 1995;38(19):3813–3820. doi:10.1021/jm00019a011
11. Schnur RC, Corman ML, Gallaschun RJ, et al. Inhibition of
the oncogene product p185erbB-2 in vitro and in vivo by
geldanamycin and dihydrogeldanamycin derivatives. J Med
Chem. 1995;38(19):3806–3812. doi:10.1021/jm00019a010
12. Söti C, Rácz A, Csermely P. A Nucleotide-dependent
molecular switch controls ATP binding at the C-terminal domain
of Hsp90. N-terminal nucleotide binding unmasks a C-terminal
binding pocket.
J
Biol Chem. 2002;277(9):7066–7075.
doi:10.1074/jbc.M105568200
13. Ratzke C, Mickler M, Hellenkamp B, Buchner J, Hugel T.
Dynamics of heat shock protein 90 C-terminal dimerization is an
important part of its conformational cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U
S A. 2010;107(37):16101–16106. doi:10.1073/pnas.1000916107
28. Anankanbil S, Mose JH, Pérez B, Cheng W, Pedersen JN,
Guo Z. Mapping the location of DATEM in multi-phase systems: