Scheme 4. Concise Diastereoselective Total Synthesis of (()-Paeonilide via Reactivity Umpolung
The observed addition of oxygen function at the electron-
rich γ-position of butenolide is exceptional. Mechanisti-
cally, the present fact can be attributed to an acid-catalyzed
structural rearrangement encompassing reactivity umpo-
lung depicted in Scheme 2. The butenolide 7 on protona-
tion of lactone carbonyl followed by a conjugate base
induced allylic prototropic shift results in an unusual olefin
isomerization10 to form the labile hydroxyfuran interme-
diate B. The possible driving forces for the present allylic
shift are (i) generation of tetrasubstituted carbonꢀcarbon
double bond between the β- and γ-positions of butenolide
and (ii) formation of an aromatic furan intermediate B.
Intermediate B under acidic conditions selectively trans-
forms into oxocarbenium ion C using relatively more
reactive double bond in furan ring. The synchronized
intramolecular nucleophilic addition of primary alcohol
forms a unique product 8. In transformation of intermedi-
ates A to D, an oxygen function adds to the electron rich
γ-carbon and a proton to the electron deficient β-carbon of
starting butenolide. Hence, the overall reaction pro-
cess becomes viable due to reactivity umpolung11 at the
γ-position of 3,4-disubstituted butenolide 7. As shown in
Scheme 3, the intermolecular reactions of 3,4-disubstituted
butenolide 11/12 with methanol in the presence of p-TSA
in refluxing toluene were unsuccessful to provide the
corresponding desired product 13/14. In both cases, the
starting butenolide was isolated back in quantitative
amount. The above fact clearly reveals that the transfor-
mation of butenolide 7 into the bicyclic product 8 proceeds
smoothly in a forward direction due to overall negative
Gibbs free energy.
a diastereoselctive total synthesis of (()-paeonilide (1).
The (þ)-paeonilide with a novel monoterpenoid skeleton
has been isolated by Liu and co-workers from the roots of
Paeonia delavayi.2a It selectively inhibited platelet aggrega-
tioninducedby the plateletactivating factor(PAF) withan
IC50 value of 8 μg/mL, importantly, without inhibitory
effect on adenoside diphosphate (ADP) or arachidonic
acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation.2a In the total
synthesis of paeonilide, generation of three contiguous
chiral centers in a enantioselective or diastreoselective
fashion is the challenging task. To date, two racemic12a,b
and two stereoselective12c,d well-organized total synthesis
of paeonilide have been reported in the literature by
employing new carbonꢀcarbon/oxygen bond forming
strategies.12 Specifically, Du’s group reported an efficiant
strategy for the synthesis of racemic paeonilide in five steps
with 59% overall yield.12b
As described in Scheme 4, our synthesis of paeonilide
began with morpholine hydrochloride promoted aldol
condensation of appropriately double O-benzyl-protected
aldehyde 1513 with glyoxalic acid (3). The above stated
stereoselective condensation directly furnished the ex-
pected maleic anhydride derivative 16 in 64% yield follow-
ing a dehydrative cyclization pathway. Barbier reaction of
propargyl bromide with a masked aldehyde 16 in presence
of activated zinc powder provided the corresponding
acetylenic derivative 17 in 82% yield, which on acidic
hydrolysis transformed into the desired ketone 18 in 87%
yield. We systematically studied the selective monobenzyl
and dibenzyl deprotections in compound 18 under various
reaction conditions. The reactions of compound 18 with
H2/PdꢀC in MeOH, HCOOH/PdꢀC in MeOH, LiCl in
DMF, BCl3 in DCM, and BBr3 in DCM resulted in
isolation of staring material and/or decomposition of
reaction mixture. Fortunately, both benzyl groups in
compound 18 were smoothly deprotected in the presence
In the next part of our study, we planned to authenticate
the feasibility of reactivity umpolung conception to design
(10) (a) Wu, Y.; Singh, R. P.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133,
12458. (b) Xue, X.-S.; Li, X.; Yu, A.; Yang, C.; Song, C.; Cheng, J.-P. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7462.
(11) (a) Mahapatra, S.; Carter, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135,
10792. (b) Huters, A. D.; Quasdorf, K. W.; Styduhar, E. D.; Garg, N. K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15797. (c) Li, Z.; Nakashige, M.; Chain,
W. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6553. (d) West, S. P.; Bisai, A.; Lim,
A. D.; Narayan, R. R.; Sarpong, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11187.
(e) Miller, A. K.; Hughes, C. C.; Kennedy-Smith, J. J.; Gradl, S. N.;
Trauner, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 17057 and references cited
therein.
(12) (a) Wang, C.; Liu, J.; Ji, Y.; Zhao, J.; Li, L.; Zhang, H. Org. Lett.
2006, 8, 2479. (b) Du, Y.; Liu, J.; Linhardt, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
3952. (c) Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Ji, Y.; Shao, Z.; Li, L. Synlett
2006, 1051. (d) Harrar, K.; Reiser, O. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 3457.
(13) Wang, J.; Hsung, R. P.; Ghosh, S. K. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1939.
(14) Varvogli, A.-A. C.; Karagiannis, I. N.; Koumbis, A. E. Tetra-
hedron 2009, 65, 1048.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C