Received: June 25, 2015 | Accepted: July 18, 2015 | Web Released: August 1, 2015
CL-150616
Helical Conformation Stability of Poly[3,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)phenylacetylene]s Depending
on the Length of Their Rigid and Linear π-Conjugated Side Groups
Zhichun Shi, Masahiro Teraguchi, Toshiki Aoki, and Takashi Kaneko*
Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, 2-8050 Ikarashi, Niigata 950-2181
(E-mail: kanetaka@gs.niigata-u.ac.jp)
We synthesized new 3,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)phenylacetyl-
ene (HPA) monomers connected with a rigid and linear π-
conjugated oligomer. The monomers were successfully poly-
merized with a rhodium catalyst [Rh(nbd)Cl]2 in the presence
of chiral PEA to give the corresponding polymers. Helix-sense-
selective polymerization proceeded for DBHPA. CD, UV, and
WAXS spectroscopic studies revealed that the intramolecular
hydrogen bonds of the polymers contributed to the stabilization
of their helical conformation but the stability depended on the
length of the rigid and linear π-conjugated side group.
Helical polymers are widely distributed in nature as DNA,
Scheme 1.
proteins, and so on. Their static helical structure is essential
to form specific hierarchical structure which exhibits smart
property depending on the molecular structure, and the helical
structures are often stabilized by intramolecular hydrogen bonds.
Artificial helical polymers, in particular π-conjugated functional
polymers, have attracted much more attention to give unique
prospects to display broad applications such as chiral sensors,
chiroptics, microelectronics, chiral magnets, chiral recognition,
asymmetric catalysis, data storage, and so on.1-11 We have
already succeeded in synthesizing poly(phenylacetylene)s with-
out chiral side groups, but with one-handed helical conformation
in solution by helix-sense-selective polymerization (HSSP) of
the corresponding achiral monomer using a chiral catalyst
system, i.e., polymerization using the catalyst [Rh(nbd)Cl]2
(nbd: 2,5-norbornadiene) in the presence of (R)-1-phenylethyl-
amine ((R)-PEA) or (S)-1-phenylethylamine ((S)-PEA),12-28 and
3,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)phenylacetylenes (HPAs) such as 3,5-
bis(hydroxymethyl)-4-dodecyloxyphenylacetylene (DHPA) and
3,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)-4-(4-dodecyloxyphenyl)phenylacetylene
(DPHPA) gave the corresponding polymer poly(HPA)s whose
rigid and one-handed helical conformation was kinetically
stabilized by intramolecular hydrogen bonds.12,28 In this study,
we have synthesized new HPA monomers DBHPA, DTHPA,
and DPETHPA connected with a rigid and linear π-conjugated
substituent and investigated the helical conformation stability
related to the side chain structure for the corresponding polymers
(Scheme 1).
DBHPA, DTHPA, and DPETHPA were successfully syn-
thesized via Suzuki-Miyaura coupling as described in the
previous work.28 Polymerization of DBHPA, DTHPA, and
DPETHPA using [Rh(nbd)Cl]2 catalyst in the presence of (R)-
PEA or (S)-PEA proceeded to yield the corresponding polymers
by the same procedures as used in the previous work.12 Yellow
solid polymers were obtained by precipitation from the polymer-
ization mixtures into methanol. The polymerization data for
these resultant polymers are summarized in Table 1. The yield
and molecular weight of the polymers were comparable to pre-
viously reported poly(HPA)s.12,28 However, no optical activity
Table 1. Polymerization of HPAs using [Rh(nbd)Cl]2 in the
presence of (R)- or (S)-1-phenylethylamine (PEA)a
b
c
Yield MW
/%
[ª]max
b
No. Monomers PEA
Mw/Mn
/105
/104 deg cm2 dmol
¹1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DBHPA
DTHPA
(R)
(S)
(R)
(S)
32
33
86
82
47
36
45
6.9
6.6
17
4.5
5.6
7.1
7.3
4.9
6.4
2.7
4.5
3.1
7.6
8.4
¹6.5
9.4
0
0
0
DPETHPA (R)
DPHPA
(R)
(S)
¹1.1
2.0
aIn toluene, [M]0 = 0.1 M, [M]0/[Cat]0 = 100, [PEA]0/[Cat]0 = 800
for Nos. 1 and 2; in THF, [M]0 = 0.1 M, [M]0/[Cat]0 = 100, [PEA]0/
[Cat]0 = 400 for Nos. 3-7. 25 °C, 3 h, precipitated with MeOH.
bDetermined from GPC calibrated by polystyrene standard (eluent:
c
THF). Molar ellipticity in THF.
was observed for poly(DTHPA) and poly(DPETHPA), which
were prepared under the same polymerization conditions as
poly(DPHPA), but poly(DBHPA) shows stronger CD signals
compared with poly(DPHPA). The split induced CD signals at
300 nm and broad signals at 350-500 nm were observed for the
THF solution of poly(DBHPA) as shown in Figure 1. The CD
intensity was nearly constant over ¹10-50 °C (Figures S1 and
S2). This behavior indicates that the helical conformation of
poly(DBHPA) was stabilized by intramolecular hydrogen bonds
as the previously reported poly(HPA)s.12,28 However, the sensi-
tivity by polar solvent was higher than that of poly(DPHPA),
because the CD signal disappeared in 1% DMSO-THF
(Figures S3 and S4).
The optically inactive poly(DTHPA) and poly(DPETHPA)
were dissolved in enantiopure (R)-PEA or (S)-PEA for 24 h at
room temperature, then yellow solid polymers were obtained
by precipitation from the polymer mixtures into methanol. For
poly(DTHPA) thus obtained, the induced CD signals appeared
in the absorption region (300 nm) of the side group chromophore
© 2015 The Chemical Society of Japan | 1413